Trial of IIb Preserving Neck Dissection

July 14, 2018 updated by: Manoj Pandey, Banaras Hindu University

Randomized Controlled Trial of IIb Preserving Neck Dissection VS Neck Dissections Involving IIb Removal (Selective/Functional) in Patients With N0 Neck With Oral Cavity Malignancies

The treatment of clinically N0 neck in malignancies of oral cavity is controversial. The options include the policy of "wait and watch"(close observation and follow-up), elective irradiation of the neck, elective surgery of the neck (neck dissection).

In elective neck dissections, the procedures commonly performed are modified radical neck dissection-III (functional neck dissection) and selective (supraomohyoid) neck dissection depending on the site of the primary lesion within the oral cavity. There are no trials of IIb preserving neck dissection in cancers of the oral cavity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Surgery of the cervical lymphatic system has evolved a lot since the introduction of classical radical neck dissection by Crile in 1906, which was later established by Martin (1945). It includes the removal of cervical lymphatic levels I-V along with removal of non-lymphatic structures namely submandibular gland, tail of parotid, omohyoid muscle, cervical plexus of nerves, spinal accessory nerve, internal jugular vein and sternocleidomastoid muscle. The main morbidity of the radical neck dissection was the trapezius muscle dysfunction with shoulder drop, resulting in pain and shoulder dysfunction. The other morbidities of radical neck dissection were cosmetic deformity of neck, painful neuromas, increased facial swelling, numbness of neck and ear.

In the last three decades, many modifications of the classical radical neck dissection (modified radical neck dissections), had been described and are increasingly applied. The main modifications have been the preservation of one or more of the non-lymphatic structures that were removed in classical radical neck dissection mainly the spinal accessory nerve, internal jugular vein, sternocleidomastoid muscle (Bocca and Pignataro, 1967). The reasons for developing these modifications were functional and cosmetic, while preserving the oncological safety of the procedure.

Much later in 1980s, the concept of selective neck dissection, for which Lindberg (1972) and Skolnik (1976) laid down important basis, was introduced. In selective neck dissections only those groups of lymph nodes are removed, which, depending upon the location of the primary tumour, are most likely to contain metastasis (Shah, 1990).

The first selective neck dissection introduced was the supraomohyoid neck dissection, which includes the removal of lymph node levels I-III, while preserving the non-lymphatic structures as functional neck dissection. Medina and Byers in a prospective study have demonstrated the utility of this supraomohyoid neck dissection in patients with clinically negative neck nodes (N0) with malignancies of oral cavity.

The posterolateral neck dissection removes lymph node levels II-V as well as retroauricular and suboccipital nodes, which is used primarily for treatment of tumours of scalp and post auricular skin.

The lateral neck dissection, which includes removal of lymph node levels II-IV, is done for tumours of larynx or hypopharynx with N0 neck.

The anterior compartment neck dissection includes removal of only lymph node level VI which is done in thyroid malignancies when there is no evidence of lateral lymphadenopathy, and is combined with lateral neck dissection(anterolateral) if there are lymphnodes involved.

Recently the concept of superselective neck dissections has been introduced. It is less radical than selective neck dissections, removing lesser number of at-risk lymph nodal groups.

H Coskun (2004) found IIb preserving superselective neck dissection as oncologically safe procedure in N0 laryngeal cancer, with more functional preservation of trapezius muscle and hence negligible shoulder disability. In this study, it was found that even in selective neck dissection, some degree of spinal accessory nerve dysfunction and shoulder disability occurs as a result of retraction of the nerve during the clearance of the lymph nodes posterior and superior to the nerve (IIb). If these lymph nodes were not removed and left in place, there would be no stretching of spinal accessory nerve during the neck dissection and shoulder disability could be avoided

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • India
    • UP
      • Varanasi, UP, India, 221005
        • Banaras Hindu University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients >18yrs of age.
  • histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma
  • clinical and radiological N0 neck

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and lactating women

    • Patients with synchronous primaries
  • H/o previous malignancy except BCC

  • Previous surgeries on neck

    • Post radiotherapy recurrence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
IIb preserving neck dissection
Procedure: Selective neck dissection
Level IIb preserving neck dissection
Other: 2
Conventional neck dissection
Procedure: Conventional Neck dissection
Conventional neck dissection (MRND type III or Supraomohyoid)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Spinal accessary nerve function
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
neck Node failure
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Banaras Hindu University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Manoj Pandey, MS, Banaras Hindu University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SND_01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Cancer

Clinical Trials on Selective neck dissection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Hong Kong

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe