Imatinib (QTI571) in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (IMPRES)

February 16, 2016 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 24-week Randomized Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Multi-center Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Oral QTI571 as an add-on Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Imatinib in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, a Randomized, Efficacy Study (IMPRES)

A multinational, multicenter, double blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of imatinib as an add-on therapy in the treatment of patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

202

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Innsbruck, Austria
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Vienna, Austria
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bruxelles, Belgium
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Calgary, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Edmonton, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • London, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Montreal, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ottawa, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Toronto, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Vancouver, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Clamart Cedex, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dresden, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Giessen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Greifswald, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Homburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Koln, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lowenstein, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Munchen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Regensberg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wurzberg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bologna, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pavia, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pisa, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Roma, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bunkyo-ku, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamamatsu, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mitaka, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Okayama, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sendai, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Suita, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Caceras, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • La Coruna, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • La Laguna, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Las Palmas de Gran Canarias, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Malaga, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Santander, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Valladolid, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Umea, Sweden
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Uppsala, Sweden
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Basel, Switzerland
        • University Hospital Basel
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • St. Gallen, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Clydebank, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85013
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90024
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Florida
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33140
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Weston, Florida, United States, 33331
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68131
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New York
      • Minneola, New York, United States, 11501-3893
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97210
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37934
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53215
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients ≥18 years of age with a current diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) according to the Dana Point 2008 Meeting: World Health Organization (WHO) Diagnostic Group I, idiopathic or heritable (familial or sporadic) PAH, PAH associated with collagen vascular disease including systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, mixed connective tissue diseases, and overlap syndrome. PAH following one year repair of congenital heart defect [Atrial Septal Defect (ASD), Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) or Posterior Descending Artery (PDA)], or PAH associated with diet therapies or other drugs
  • A Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) ≥ 800 dynes.sec.cm-5 (as assessed by Right Heart Catheterization (RHC) at screening or in the 3 months preceding the screening visit) despite treatment with two or more specific PAH therapies, including Endothelin Receptor Antagonists (ERAs), phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5), or subcutaneous, inhaled, intravenous or oral prostacyclin analogues for ≥ 3 months. Background therapy doses were to be stable for ≥ 30 days except for warfarin and prostacyclin analogues ( ≥ 30 days but doses could vary even within the month before enrollment).
  • World Health Organization functional Class II-IV. For WHO Functional Class IV, one of the 2 or more specific PAH therapies were to be an inhaled, subcutaneous, intravenous or oral prostacyclin analogue, unless the subject showed intolerance of prostacyclin analogues.
  • 6MWD ≥ 150 meters and ≤ 450 meters at screening. Distances of two consecutive 6MWTs were to be within 15% of one another.

Key Exclusion criteria

  • With a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure > 15 mm Hg to rule out PAH secondary to left ventricular dysfunction.
  • With a diagnosis of pulmonary artery or vein stenosis
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 45%
  • With Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)
  • With evidence of major bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage
  • With a history of elevated intracranial pressure
  • With a history of latent bleeding risk such as diabetic retinopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding due to gastric or duodenal ulcers, or colitis ulcerosa
  • With a QTcF > 450 msec for males and > 470 msec for females at screening and baseline in the absence of right bundle branch block.
  • With a history of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or ventricular flutter
  • With a history of Torsades de Pointes
  • With a history of long QT syndrome
  • Having undergone atrial septostomy in the 3 months prior to the screening visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: imatinib mesylate
Imatinib mesylate (QTI571) 200 mg once daily for two weeks, increased to 400 mg once daily if well tolerated. If 400 mg dose was not well tolerated, a down titration to 200 mg once daily was permitted.
Two or 4 imatinib mesylate (QTI571) 100 mg film coated tablets once daily.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo to imatinib mesylate taken once daily. Participants receiving placebo were allowed to receive already approved PAH treatments.
Placebo to imatinib 100 mg film coated tablets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Six-minute Walk Distance Test (6MWD) Between Imatinib and Placebo at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks
This standardized walk course was 30 meters in length. During the walk the participant was connected to a portable pulse oximeter via a finger probe. Participants were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed for as far as they could manage in 6 minutes. The total distance walked (in meters) was recorded. Results were compared between the 2 groups.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Worsening Comparing Imatinib Versus Placebo for Adjudicated Cases
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Clinical worsening per participant was measured by the onset of any adjudicated event (all cause mortality; overnight hospitalization for worsening of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH); worsening of WHO functional class by one level; 15% decline in Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) measured on two consecutive occasions) at 24 weeks treatment, comparing imatinib to placebo groups. A cox regression analysis model was used.
24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Right Atrial Pressure
Time Frame: baseline and week 24
Change from baseline in right atrial pressure (mmHg) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The right atrial pressure was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. A higher right atrial pressure number indicates worsening.
baseline and week 24
Change From Baseline in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: baseline and week 24
Change from baseline in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mmHg) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The mean pulmonary arterial pressure was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. A higher mean pulmonary arterial pressure number indicates worsening.
baseline and week 24
Change From Baseline in Mean Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure
Time Frame: baseline and week 24
Change from baseline in mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (mmHg)was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The right atrial mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state.
baseline and week 24
Change From Baseline in Systemic Vascular Resistance
Time Frame: baseline and week 24
Change from baseline in systemic vascular resistance (dynes*sec*cm^-5) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The systemic vascular resistance was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. Reduction from baseline in mean systemic vascular resistance indicates improvement.
baseline and week 24
Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance
Time Frame: baseline and week 24
Change from baseline in pulmonary vascular resistance (dynes*sec*cm^-5) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The pulmonary vascular resistance was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. Reduction from baseline in pulmonary vascular resistance indicates improvement.
baseline and week 24
Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Resistance Index
Time Frame: baseline and week 24
Change from baseline in pulmonary resistance index (dynes*sec*cm^-5/m2) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The pulmonary resistance index was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. A reduction from baseline in pulmonary resistance index indicates improvement.
baseline and week 24
Change From Baseline in Cardiac Output
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change from baseline in cardiac output (L/min) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The cardiac output was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. An increase from baseline (higher number) in cardiac output indicates improvement.
24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure
Time Frame: baseline and week 24
Change from baseline in systolic arterial blood pressure (mmHg) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The systolic arterial blood was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state.
baseline and week 24
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Arterial Blood Pressure
Time Frame: baseline and week 24
Change from baseline in diastolic arterial blood pressure (mmHg) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The diastolic arterial blood pressure was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state.
baseline and week 24
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change from baseline in heart rate (bpm) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The heart rate was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state.
24 weeks
Change in Borg Dyspnea Score During 6-minute Walk Test
Time Frame: week 24
Change in Borg scale was measured at different time points at week 24. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10. Participants pointed to indicate their level of dyspnea before and at the end of exercise testing (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). A reduction in this score indicates an improvement.
week 24
Covariance of End of Study CAMPHOR Score
Time Frame: Week 24
The CAMPHOR test consists of 65 items and 3 scales. Two scales measure Health Related Quality of Life. 1) Symptoms: consists of 25 items measuring loss or abnormality of psychological, physiological or anatomical structure or function; further sub-divided into 3 subscales (energy, breathlessness and mood), 2) Disability: consists of 15 items measuring any restriction or lack of ability to perform an activity. 3) Quality of Life (QOL): consists of 25 items defining how individuals perceived ability and capacity to satisfy their needs. The 25-item symptom and QOL scales score from 0-25 where a higher score indicates the presence of more symptoms and poor QOL, respectively. The 15-item functioning scale scores 0-30; a higher score indicates poor functioning.
Week 24
Plasma Concentration of QTI571 200 mg and Its Metabolite (GCP74588) Pre-dose and Between 0 Hour to 3 Hour Post-dose Per Participant
Time Frame: predose and between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1, day 14, day 28 and day 168

Blood samples were taken from each subject participating in the study (placebo group and active treatment group) once predose and once between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1 (baseline), day 14, day 28 and day 168.

The parent compound QTI571 and its active metabolite, GCP74588, were measured in plasma by validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay.

predose and between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1, day 14, day 28 and day 168
Plasma Concentration of QTI571 400 mg and Its Metabolite (GCP74588) Pre-dose and Between 0 Hour to 3 Hour Post-dose Per Participant
Time Frame: predose and between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1, day 14, day 28 and day 168

Blood samples were taken from each subject participating in the study (placebo group and active treatment group) once predose and once between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1 (baseline), day 14, day 28 and day 168.

The parent compound QTI571 and its active metabolite, GCP74588, were measured in plasma by validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay.

predose and between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1, day 14, day 28 and day 168

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Clinical Trials on imatinib mesylate

Subscribe