Evaluation of DIDGET TM World Reports

September 18, 2024 updated by: Ascensia Diabetes Care

Evaluation of Avatar Web Reports

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a Diabetes data management program in the hands of potential users, both lay persons and healthcare professionals. With this data management system glucose results from the DIDGET TM meter can be uploaded to a secure website and used by adults with diabetes, by parents and guardians of children with diabetes, and by health care professionals to monitor diabetes by recognizing trends and patterns in blood sugar levels.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Diabetes data management programs upload glucose meter results to computers to provide information to lay persons and their health care professionals. With this data management system glucose results from the DIDGET TM meter can be uploaded to a secure website and used by adults with diabetes, by parents and guardians of children with diabetes, and by health care professionals to monitor diabetes by recognizing trends and patterns in blood sugar levels. During the study subjects performed specific tasks, such as uploading meter results and displaying reports. The study evaluates the subjects' success in using the software program, the program's ease of use, clarity and usefulness of user instructions, and user satisfaction with the diabetes data management program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Escondido, California, United States, 92026
        • AMCR Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lay users must be:

    1. Be at least 18 years of age
    2. Have diabetes or be the parent or legal guardian of a child with diabetes
    3. Be testing blood sugar at home at least twice daily for at least one month or be the parent or legal guardian of a child who has been testing blood sugar at home at least twice daily for at least one month
    4. Be able to speak, read, and understand English
    5. Have experience using a PC, navigating software programs, or browsing the internet
  • Healthcare professionals must:

    1. Have experience using the internet
    2. Have experience using diabetes data management software in the medical office

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Person working for a competitive medical device company
  2. Person having a cognitive disorder or condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the person at risk or compromise the integrity of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Intended Users of the Software
Young adults, parents/guardians of young people under age 18, and healthcare professionals who work with this population would be intended users of the data management program. The DIDGET World Reports software is used to upload blood glucose results from the DIDGET Blood Glucose Monitoring System so that intended users can identify patterns in their diabetes management.
During the study subjects performed specific tasks, such as uploading meter results to a secure website and displaying reports.
Other Names:
  • DIDGET World Web Community

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Rated Successful (<=3) by Healthcare Professionals When Participants Performed Specific Software Tasks
Time Frame: 1-2 hours

Study staff rated participants on their success at performing specific tasks. The rating scale was:

  1. = Successful ( no assistance)
  2. = Successful after staff prompted to view user instructions
  3. = Successful with verbal assistance or review of part of user instructions (as review a specific function during a Customer Service call)
  4. = Unsuccessful (Subject could not perform the task)
  5. = Subject could not perform task due to software or hardware failure after repeated attempt.
1-2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Rated Clarity and Usefulness of User Instructions as Good to Excellent (>=3)
Time Frame: 1-2 hours

After the software evaluation, subjects were asked to review the online help and rate it on a 5 point scale.

  1. = Unacceptable
  2. = Poor
  3. = Good
  4. = Very Good
  5. = Excellent
1-2 hours
Number of Participants Who Rated Ease of Performing Specific Tasks as Very Simple to Neither Simple Nor Difficult (<=3 Rating)
Time Frame: 1-2 hours

Subjects rated ease of using the software with respect to specific tasks. The rating scale was:

  1. = Very Simple
  2. = Simple
  3. = Neither Simple nor Difficult
  4. = Difficult
  5. = Very Difficult
1-2 hours
Number of Participants Who Rated Their Satisfaction With The Following as Good to Excellent (>=3)
Time Frame: 1-2 hours

Subjects responded to questionnaires in rating features and appearance, usefulness, and satisfaction on a 5 point scale:

  1. = Unacceptable
  2. = Poor
  3. = Good
  4. = Very Good
  5. = Excellent
1-2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Timothy Bailey, MD, AMCR Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimated)

June 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CTD-2009-08

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on DIDGET World Web Community Reports

Subscribe