Bioequivalence of Generic Imiquimod Cream, 5% When Compared to Aldara™ (Imiquimod) Cream, 5% in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis

September 2, 2020 updated by: Actavis Inc.

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Determine the Clinical Equivalence of a Generic Imiquimod Cream, 5% and Aldara™ Cream in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis

At the end of the study, safety and efficacy outcome measures will be compared to determine a) if dosing with Generic Imiquimod cream, 5% is therapeutically equivalent to the currently marketed Aldara (imiquimod) cream, 5% and b) if both imiquimod 5% creams are superior in comparison to the Vehicle cream.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A nationwide, multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled parallel group comparison study of a Generic Imiquimod cream, 5% (Actavis Mid-Atlantic LLC) and currently marketed Aldara (imiquimod) cream, 5% (distributed by Graceway Pharmaceuticals, LLC) was conducted in subjects with actinic keratoses (AKs) on the face and/or anterior scalp in order to evaluate the therapeutic equivalence of these two active treatments and to establish superiority of the efficacy of these two products over a Vehicle cream. Subjects were randomized to one of three treatment groups on a 2:2:1 basis as follows: (1) Generic Imiquimod cream, 5%, (2) Aldara (imiquimod) cream, 5%, and (3) Vehicle cream. The duration of treatment was 16 weeks (± 7 days).

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects in each treatment group with Complete Clearance (having no clinically visible actinic keratosis lesions in the 25 cm2 contiguous treatment area at the 8-week post-treatment visit) of AK lesions. The secondary efficacy endpoints were the Partial Clearance rates, defined as the proportion of subjects with at least a 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions counted at Baseline at the end-of-treatment visit (Week 16, EOT) and at the 8 weeks post-treatment visit/test-of-cure (Week 24, TOC), and the proportion of subjects with Complete Clearance of AK lesions at the end-of-treatment (Week 16, EOT) visit.

A 90% Wald's confidence interval with Yate's continuity correction was constructed around the difference between the proportions of subjects with Complete Clearance of AK lesions in the active treatments (Generic Imiquimod minus Aldara) to evaluate therapeutic equivalence in the primary efficacy analyses. Two-sided, continuity-corrected statistics were used to evaluate the superiority of each active treatment's Complete Clearance rate over that of the Vehicle treatment. The therapeutic comparability evaluations in the per-protocol (PP) population were considered primary while those in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population were considered supportive. The superiority comparisons in the ITT population were considered primary while those in the PP population were considered supportive. If the 90% confidence interval (CI) around the difference between the Generic Imiquimod and Aldara Complete Clearance rates in the PP population were contained within the interval 0.20 to +0.20, and each of these rates was greater than, and statistically different (p<0.05) from, the Vehicle rate in the ITT population, then Generic Imiquimod and Aldara were considered to be therapeutically equivalent.

Secondary efficacy analyses were conducted on the proportion of subjects in each treatment group with Complete Clearance of AK lesions at the Week 16, EOT visit as well as evaluation of the Partial Clearance of AK lesions at both the EOT and TOC visits. The results at both the EOT visit (Week 16) and those at 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 24, TOC) were statistically analyzed by the same methods described for the primary efficacy variable.

Both EOT and TOC analyses were conducted in the ITT population. The TOC analysis was conducted in the PP population and the EOT analysis was conducted in the EOT PP population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

462

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States, 71913
        • Burke Pharmaceutical Research
    • California
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93720
        • Associates In Research, Inc.
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92117
        • Skin Surgery Medical Group, Inc.
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80209
        • Cherry Creek Research, Inc.
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33175
        • FXM Research Corp.
    • Georgia
      • Newnan, Georgia, United States, 30263
        • MedaPhase, Inc.
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, United States, 47713
        • Deaconess Clinic, Inc.
    • Minnesota
      • Fridley, Minnesota, United States, 55432
        • Minnesota Clinical Study Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mt. Sinai School of Medicine
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11790
        • Derm Research Center of New York, Inc.
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • University Dermatology Consultants, Inc.
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97223
        • Oregon Medical Research Center, P.C.
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Rhode Island Hospital, Dermatopharmacology Division
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37917
        • Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, P.C.
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37215
        • Tennessee Clinical Research Center
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
        • Dermresearch, Inc.
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77056
        • Suzanne Bruce & Associates, P.A.
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84124
        • Dermatology Research Center, Inc.
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
        • Premier Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects were male or non-pregnant females, 18 years of age or older, in generally good health. Females who were post-menopausal, surgically sterile or using a medically acceptable form of birth control with a negative urine pregnancy test at the Baseline visit.
  • Subjects provided written and verbal informed consent.
  • Subjects presented to the clinic with at least 4 but no more than 12 visible, discrete nonhyperkeratotic, nonhypertrophic actinic keratosis lesions within a 25 cm2 Treatment Area on the face and/or anterior scalp.
  • Subjects were willing and able to comply with study instructions and return to the clinic for required visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who were lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Subjects had hyperkeratotic, hypertrophic or large mat-like AKs within the 25 cm2 Treatment Area.
  • Subjects who had the need or were planning to be exposed to artificial tanning devices or excessive sunlight during the trial.
  • Subjects who were immunosuppressed (e.g., HIV, systemic malignancy, graft vs. host disease, etc.).
  • Subjects who experienced an unsuccessful outcome from previous imiquimod therapy.
  • Subjects with known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any of the active or inactive components of the study drugs.
  • Within 2 months: Facial and/or Anterior Scalp: laser resurfacing, photodynamic therapy, chemical peels, dermabrasion, topical application of 5-FU, imiquimod, diclofenac sodium or other treatments for AK or photodamage.
  • Subjects who used the following systemic, oral or topical therapies for the periods specified prior to entry into the study:

Within 2 days: Topicals of any kind to the selected Treatment Area. Within 2 weeks: Facial topical medications: corticosteroids, alpha- hydroxyacids (e.g., glycolic acid, lactic acid, etc. greater than 5%), beta-hydroxyacid (salicylic acid greater than 2%), urea - greater than 5% or prescription retinoids (e.g., tazarotene, adapalene, tretinoin) to the face and/or anterior scalp.

Within 2 weeks: Cryotherapy to lesions adjacent to or within the 25 cm2 Treatment Area.

Within 4 weeks: Systemic steroid therapy: chemotherapeutic agents, psoralens, immunotherapy, or retinoids.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Generic Imiquimod
imiquimod cream, 5%
5% topical cream dispensed in individual 0.25 g sachets applied twice a week for 16 weeks
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Aldara™
Aldara™ (imiquimod) cream, 5%
5% topical cream dispensed in individual 0.25 g sachets applied twice a week for 16 weeks
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Vehicle cream
Vehicle cream (Actavis)
Topical cream vehicle matching Generic imiquimod dispensed in individual 0.25 g sachets applied twice a week for 16 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects in Each Treatment Group With Complete Clearance of AK Lesions at the Test of Cure Visit (Week 24)
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects With at Least a 75% Reduction in the Number of AK Lesions From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) Visit (Week 16).
Time Frame: Week 16
Week 16
Percentage of Subjects With at Least a 75% Reduction in the Number of AK Lesions From Baseline to 8 Weeks Post Treatment (Test of Cure Visit).
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Christine M. Winslow, Ph.D., Actavis Mid-Atlantic LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratoses

Clinical Trials on imiquimod

3
Subscribe