Osteocel® Plus in eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF®)

April 17, 2015 updated by: NuVasive

Osteocel® Plus in eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF®): Evaluation of Radiographic and Patient Outcomes

This is a prospective, non-randomized multi-center study to compare the use of Osteocel® Plus in subjects who receive XLIF® (eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) surgery at one or two levels. These subjects will present with degenerative conditions in the lumbar spine that are amenable to surgical treatment and will be screened prior to study enrollment. Subjects will receive Osteocel Plus during their XLIF operation. Subjects will be followed for 24-months following surgery to determine the number of study subjects that are solidly fused at or before 24 months postoperatively, and to determine the mean time to fusion. This data will be compared to published and/or retrospective data for autograft, synthetic ceramics and Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Osteocel Plus is an allograft cellular bone matrix containing native mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) which is intended to mimic the biologic performance of autograft without the morbidity associated with the autograft harvest. Mesenchymal stem cells, like those found in Osteocel Plus, are naturally occurring in the body and can differentiate into a variety of tissue types, depending on the local environment. Once implanted, MSCs can differentiate into osteoblasts, which produce new bone matrix. MSCs also naturally secrete bone-inducing growth factors that signal the patient's endogenous cells to migrate and participate in the bone formation process. Osteocel Plus is different from other orthobiologic products such as DBM and allograft cancellous bone because it contains living stem cells, which provide osteogenic potential. The cells include mesenchymal stem cells from an adult human donor; they are not from an embryonic source.

This study is being conducted to determine the percentage of patients with solid spinal fusions after being treated with Osteocel in an XLIF procedure. Due to the unique processing conditions, Osteocel Plus retains a high concentration of stem cells in conjunction with the allograft bone matrix, so it is hypothesized that the fusion rate with Osteocel Plus will be comparable to published data for autograft. The Osteocel product family has already been used in approximately 15,000 cases worldwide.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Shiley Center for Orthopaedic, Scripps Green Hospital
    • Florida
      • Hollywood, Florida, United States, 33021
        • Broward Spine Institute
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33140
        • South Florida Spine Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34232
        • Southeastern Spine Center, Doctors Hospital of Sarasota
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • USF, Tampa General Hospital
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
        • Pinnacle Orthopaedics, Wellstone Kennestone Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Naperville, Illinois, United States, 60540
        • The Spine Center of DuPage Medical Group, Edward Hospital
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46219
        • Indiana Center for Neurosurgery
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65205
        • Columbia Orthopaedic Group, Boone Hospital Center
      • Jefferson City, Missouri, United States, 65101
        • Spine Midwest, St. Mary's Health Center
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89109
        • Western Regional Center for Brain & Spine Surgery, Surgery Center of S. Nevada
    • New York
      • Lockport, New York, United States, 14094
        • Buffalo Spine Surgery, Kenmore Mercy
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Existing clinic patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Persistent back and/or leg pain unresponsive to conservative treatment for at least six (6) months, unless clinically indicated earlier
  2. Indicated for interbody fusion of one or two contiguous lumbar segments (L1 to L5)
  3. Objective evidence of primary diagnosis must be confirmed by appropriate imaging studies
  4. 18-80 years of age at the date of written informed consent
  5. Able to undergo surgery based on physical exam, medical history and surgeon judgment
  6. Expected to survive at least 2 years beyond surgery
  7. Willing and able to return for post-treatment exams according to the follow-up called for in the protocol
  8. Signed and dated Informed Consent Form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has a mental or physical condition that would limit the ability to comply with study requirements
  2. Lumbar spine abnormality requiring treatment at more than two levels
  3. Systemic or local infection; active or latent
  4. Previous failed fusion at the operative level
  5. Diseases that significantly inhibit bone healing (osteoporosis, metabolic bone disease, uncontrolled diabetes, dialysis dependent renal failure, symptomatic liver disease)
  6. Undergoing chemotherapy or radiation treatment, or chronic use of steroids (defined as more than 6 weeks of steroid use within 12 months of surgery, other than episodic use or inhaled corticosteroids)
  7. Pregnant, or plans to become pregnant during the study
  8. Subject is a prisoner
  9. Involvement in active litigation relating to the spine (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contended)
  10. A significant general illness (e.g., HIV, active metastatic cancer of any type) is present; subject is immunocompromised or is being treated with immunosuppressive agents
  11. Participating in another clinical study that would confound study data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportion of subjects with radiographically apparent fusion.
Time Frame: 6-months, 12-months and 24-months
6-months, 12-months and 24-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The evaluation of angular displacement on flexion/extension films.
Time Frame: Post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month
Post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month
The evaluation of bridging bone on CT.
Time Frame: 6-month, 12-month
6-month, 12-month
Preservation of interbody height over time.
Time Frame: All post-operative follow-up visits: Post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month
All post-operative follow-up visits: Post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month
The rate of complications attributable to the use of Osteocel Plus requiring intervention.
Time Frame: All study follow-up visits: Post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month
All study follow-up visits: Post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month
The change in subject self-reported pain ratings (VAS scores).
Time Frame: from baseline through post-operation follow-up (visits at post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-months)
from baseline through post-operation follow-up (visits at post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-months)
The change in Oswestry Disability Index scores.
Time Frame: from baseline through post-operation follow-up (visits at post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-months)
from baseline through post-operation follow-up (visits at post-op, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month and 24-months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kelli Howell, MS, NuVasive

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 21, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on biologic, Osteocel Plus

3
Subscribe