A Surgical Simulation Study to Evaluate the Safety of a Device Mechanism as Treatment for Vaginal Apical Prolapse

February 9, 2010 updated by: Ethicon, Inc.

A Prospective, Observational Surgical Simulation Study to Evaluate the Safety of the VFIX Device Mechanism as Treatment for Vaginal Apical Prolapse

The purpose of this pilot study is to perform a procedure to evaluate the safety of the placement of a new device (known as the VFIX device).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In this study, the surgeon will not use the actual V-Fix device. Instead, the surgeon will use a routine operating room instrument, which is similar to the size and shape of the V-Fix device to mimic the placement of the VFIX device by using the routine operating room instrument to push the top of your vagina towards the ligament.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
        • North Shore Private Hospital
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
        • St George Private Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
        • Frances Perry House
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
        • Royal Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

hospital referrals

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
  • Subjects with apical support prolapse in whom the surgeon may consider a surgical procedure to correct level 1 support, with "C" or "D" descent at least halfway down the vaginal length (i.e. uterus and cervix or the vaginal vault in hysterectomised subjects), and having laparoscopy or abdominal surgery (additional surgery e.g. tubal ligation or ovarian cystectomy is also allowed).
  • Vaginal examination during the screening visit confirms that the lateral fornix of the vagina can reach both the left and right SSL and therefore the surgical simulation can be performed.
  • The investigator considers that the subject is medically fit enough to receive extended anaesthesia of approximately 15 minutes, to complete the additional anatomical observation study procedures.
  • Subjects agree to participate in the study and document this agreement by signing the Ethics Committee approved informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of subjects without any bowel entrapment between the vagina and the right SSL in subjects that the surgeon declares he would have deployed the V-Fix device
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of subjects without any bladder entrapment or traversing of the peritoneal cavity between the vagina and the right or left SSL in subjects that the surgeon declares he would have deployed the V-Fix device
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative
Incidence of subjects without any bowel entrapment between the vagina and the left SSL in subjects that the surgeon declares he would have deployed the V-Fix device
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2010

Last Verified

February 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 300-08-009

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Subscribe