- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01009060
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK239512 in Schizophrenia
October 9, 2017 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
A Randomised Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Cognitive Enhancing Effect of GSK239512 in Stable Patients With Schizophrenia
This study aims to evaluate the cognitive enhancing effects and tolerability of GSK239512 compared to placebo in patients with schizophrenia
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This is a 7-week, Phase II, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design study in male and female subjects with schizophrenia who are stabilised on antipsychotic medication.
Subjects will be randomised to receive either GSK239512 or placebo for 7 weeks.
They will undergo weekly review of safety, tolerability and cognitive performance measures.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Garden Grove, California, United States, 92845
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
- GSK Investigational Site
-
National City, California, United States, 91950
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
- GSK Investigational Site
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92102
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Torrance, California, United States, 90502
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46222
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Maryland
-
Catonsville, Maryland, United States, 21228
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, United States, 02130
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
New Jersey
-
Mount Laurel, New Jersey, United States, 08054
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- GSK Investigational Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
North Carolina
-
Butner, North Carolina, United States, 27509
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 55 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of Schizophrenia
- No acute exacerbation of symptoms requiring hospital admission or step up care in the previous six months.
- Not on any symptomatic treatment for cognition
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poses a significant homicidal or suicidal risk or evidence of previous homicidal or suicidal risk.
- Co-morbid psychiatric or significant physical illness
- Alcohol or drug abuse or dependence.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: GSK239512
Repeat dose.
|
Histamine H3 Antagonist
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Repeat dose.
Placebo to match GSK239512
|
Placebo to match GSK239512
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Composite Score of CSSB Following Dosing With GSK239512
Time Frame: Baseline and up to Week 7
|
The CSSB is a computerized battery with following domains (score range): Verbal memory (0-75), working memory (0-28), motor speed (0-100), verbal fluency, attention and speed of information processing (0-110) and executive functions with higher score representing better performance.
Two Baseline CSSB testing were conducted; the first on the day prior to commencing dosing (Day -1) and the other test pre-dose on Day 1: the average of the two tests was used as Baseline.
Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time minus score at Baseline.
For each individual task from the CSSB, the Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment.
A composite score was calculated by averaging all the measures, and then calculating a z-score of the composite.
Higher the composite score, better is the performance.
Z-score is the measure of standard deviation away from the mean score.
|
Baseline and up to Week 7
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Composite Score of Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) at Week 7
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 7
|
MCCB measures functioning across various cognitive domains and is comprised of ten tests that assess seven cognitive domains (speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition).
Its measurements are based on timed paper-and-pencil, computerized, and orally-administered tests, as well as spatial tests using geometric cubes.
MCCB composite T scores are between 40 and 60 (normal range) and < 40 (below normal range).
Higher scores indicate better performance.
The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment.
If either measurement meant to be used in the mean was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment.
If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis.
Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time post Baseline minus score at Baseline.
|
Baseline and Week 7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Individual Cognitive Domain Scores in CSSB at Week 7
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 7
|
The CSSB is a computerized battery with following domains (score range): Verbal memory (0-75), working memory (0-28), motor speed (0-100), verbal fluency, attention and speed of information processing (0-110) and executive functions with higher score representing better performance.
Two Baseline CSSB testing were conducted; the first on the day prior to commencing dosing (Day -1) and the other test pre-dose on Day 1: the average of the two tests was used as Baseline.
Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time minus score at Baseline.
For each individual task from the CSSB, the Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment.
A composite score was calculated by averaging all the measures, and then calculating a z-score of the composite.
Higher the composite score, better is the performance.
Z-score is the measure of standard deviation away from the mean score.
|
Baseline and Week 7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Individual Cognitive Domain Scores in MCCB at Week 7
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 7
|
MCCB measures functioning across various cognitive domains and is comprised of ten tests that assess seven cognitive domains (speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition) Its measurements are based on timed paper-and-pencil, computerized, and orally-administered tests, as well as spatial tests using geometric cubes.
MCCB composite T scores are between 40 and 60 (normal range) and < 40 (below normal range).
Higher scores indicate better performance.
The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment.
If either measurement meant to be used in the mean was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment.
If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis.
Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time post Baseline minus score at Baseline.
|
Baseline and Week 7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) at Week 7
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 7
|
BPRS is the clinician rating of psychiatric symptoms; higher score indicates higher severity; 18-items scored 1-7; lower score is 18 and highest score is 126.
The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment.
If either measurement meant to be used in the mean was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment.
If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis.
Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time post Baseline minus score at Baseline.
|
Baseline and Week 7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) at Week 7
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 7
|
The SANS was a tool used to assess five symptom complexes to obtain clinical ratings of negative symptoms in par.
with schizophrenia.
Complexes include: affective blunting; alogia (impoverished thinking); avolition/apathy; anhedonia/asociality; and disturbance of attention.
Assessment was conducted on six-point scale (0=not at all to 5=severe) for a total scoring range of 0-120.
Lower scores represent better performance.
The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment.
If either measurement meant to be used in the mean was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment.
If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis.
Change from Baseline was calculated as score at a given time post Baseline minus score at Baseline.
|
Baseline and Week 7
|
|
Change From Baseline in University of California and San Diego (UCSD) Performance Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) at Week 7
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 7
|
The UPSA is a measure of Functional Capacity and assesses skills involved in community tasks.
It is composed of five subdomains- comprehension and planning, finance, communication, mobility and house management.
When combined, measures functional capacity.
The comprehension and planning ranges from 0 to 14, the finance ranges from 0 to 11, the communication ranges from 0 to 12, the mobility ranges from 0 to 9, and the house management ranges from 0 to 4. Then a medication management score of 0 to 37 is added.
In total, the Assessment is thus scored on a 0 to 87 scale, with higher scores indicating better performance.
The Baseline was calculated as the mean of the second screening assessment and the Day 1 pre-dose assessment.
If either was missing, then the Baseline value was the non-missing assessment.
If both were missing, then Baseline was considered missing and the task was excluded from the analysis.
Change from Baseline was score at a given time post Baseline minus Baseline score
|
Baseline and Week 7
|
|
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to Day 59
|
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
SAE is any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment.
|
Up to Day 59
|
|
Number of Par. With Most Severe On-treatment Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time Frame: Up to Day 59
|
Triplicate 12-lead ECGs were obtained at Baseline (screening visit).
Single 12-lead ECGs were obtained at each subsequent time point during the study.
Abnormal ECG findings were presented for the most severe on-treatment result.
|
Up to Day 59
|
|
Number of Par. With Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Readings Outside Clinical Concern Range
Time Frame: Up to Day 59
|
Blood pressure readings both systolic and diastolic were collected at pre-dose and then hourly post-dose until 6 hours post-dose or until the par.
got discharged.
Blood pressure was measured in both standing (Std) and supine (Sup) position.
Data with only abnormal values were presented.
For SBP the data of concern was <90 or >140 and increase from Baseline (IFB) >=40; <90 or >140 and decrease from Baseline (DFB) >=30.
For DBP the data of concern was <50 or >90 and IFB >=30; <50 or >90 and DFB >=20.
|
Up to Day 59
|
|
Number of Par. With Heart Rate Measured Value Outside Clinical Concern Range
Time Frame: Up to Day 59
|
Heart rate readings were collected at pre-dose and then hourly post-dose until 6 hours post-dose or until the participant got discharged.
It was measured in both supine and standing position.
For both Std and Sup positions, heart rate data of concern was <50 or >100 and IFB >=30; <50 or >100 and DFB >=30.
Data with only abnormal values were presented.
|
Up to Day 59
|
|
Number of Par. With Abnormal Hematology Parameters Values at Any Time on Treatment
Time Frame: Up to Day 59
|
Hematology parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Lymphocytes, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV), Monocytes, Platelet count, Red blood cell count (RBC), Reticulocytes, Neutrophils count and White blood cell (WBC) count were presented as values of potential clinical concern at any time on treatment.
Only those parameters with any abnormal value are presented.
|
Up to Day 59
|
|
Number of Par. With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Parameters Values at Any Time On-treatment
Time Frame: Up to Day 59
|
Clinical chemistry parameters: Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Calcium, Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Total Bilirubin, Total protein, Urea/ Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were presented as values of potential clinical concern at any time on treatment.
Only those parameters with any abnormal value are presented.
|
Up to Day 59
|
|
Number of Par. With Abnormal Urinalysis Parameters Values of Potential Clinical Concern
Time Frame: Up to Day 59
|
Samples for urinalysis were collected on Days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 and up to Day 59 (follow-up) to assess specific gravity, pH, glucose, protein, blood and ketone by dipstick and microscopic examination (if blood or protein is abnormal).
|
Up to Day 59
|
|
Plasma Concentrations of GSK239512 (Cmax) at Steady State After Repeat Dosing on Dose Review Visit at Any Time On-treatment
Time Frame: 15 minutes prior to start and 15 minutes after completion of CSSB at Week 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7
|
One Pharmacokinetic (PK) sample was collected within 15 minutes prior to the start of the CSSB and one PK sample was collected within 15 minutes after completion of the CSSB.
'n' was the number of samples available for analysis.
|
15 minutes prior to start and 15 minutes after completion of CSSB at Week 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 10, 2011
Study Completion (Actual)
August 10, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 5, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
November 6, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 8, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 9, 2017
Last Verified
August 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 113147
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Study Data/Documents
-
Individual Participant Data Set
Information identifier: 113147Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Annotated Case Report Form
Information identifier: 113147Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Clinical Study Report
Information identifier: 113147Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Statistical Analysis Plan
Information identifier: 113147Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Dataset Specification
Information identifier: 113147Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Informed Consent Form
Information identifier: 113147Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Study Protocol
Information identifier: 113147Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...Recruiting
-
Organon and CoCompletedSchizophrenia, Paranoid | Schizophrenia, Disorganized | Schizophrenia, Undifferentiated
-
Organon and CoCompletedSchizophrenia, Paranoid | Schizophrenia, Disorganized | Schizophrenia, Undifferentiated
-
Newron Pharmaceuticals SPARecruitingTreatment-resistant SchizophreniaUnited States, India
-
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, BhubaneswarCompletedTreatment Resistant SchizophreniaIndia
-
Bradley LegaRecruiting
-
Central Institute of Mental Health, MannheimRecruitingSchizophrenia | Treatment Resistant SchizophreniaGermany
-
Shanghai Zhongze Therapeutics Co., Ltd.Yale UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Ole Köhler-ForsbergAarhus University HospitalRecruiting
Clinical Trials on GSK239512
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedDementia | Mild Cognitive ImpairmentCanada
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedAlzheimer's DiseaseBulgaria, Germany, Korea, Republic of, Russian Federation, United Kingdom, Chile, Czech Republic, Slovakia
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingSpain, Bulgaria, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Canada, Czech Republic
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedAlzheimer's DiseaseAustralia, Korea, Republic of, United Kingdom, Czechia