Optimal Planning Target Volume With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

January 27, 2015 updated by: Duke University

Determination of the Optimal Planning Target Volume for Brain Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

The purpose of this study is to estimate the rate of local control at the treated site of the metastasis as a function of 1mm versus 3mm expansion about the gross tumor volume (GTV). Each lesion, not each patient will be ranndomized to either the 1mm or 3mm margin with 40 lesions randomized to each arm.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used either as definitive treatment alone or as a "boost" in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for the treatment of brain metastases. To establish a target for SRS, the gross tumor volume (GTV) is typically defined as the contrast-enhancing volume on T1-weighted axial MRI images. In turn, the volume chosen for treatment (the planning target volume or PTV) is generated by expanding the GTV to account for microscopic extension of tumor beyond the MRI-visualized volume and deviations in patient positioning at the time of treatment., However, the optimal PTV in patients undergoing SRS of brain metastases has not been established.

This pilot randomized study of approximately 49 patients (representing a total of 80 brain lesions) should be sufficient to explore the effect of margin expansion around the GTV for brain metastases. The patients enrolled in this study will undergo radiosurgery to a planning treatment volume generated by expanding the GTV of each lesion by either a 1mm or 3mm margin. Each lesion, not each patient, will be randomized to receive either the 1mm or 3mm margin with 40 lesions randomized to each arm (a patient with multiple lesions potentially could have a lesion randomized to the 1mm arm and a different lesion randomized to the 3mm arm). The primary outcome of 12-month local recurrence and the secondary outcome of the rate of radionecrosis at the SRS treatment site will be lesion-specific outcomes. All other secondary outcomes will be patient-specific outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Life expectancy of at least 6 months.
  • Karnofsky Performance Score greater than 70
  • Graded prognostic assessment (GPA score 0.5 or greater
  • 1 to 3 brain metastases unresectable
  • Maximum tumor diameter no larger than 4cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary lesion with radiosensitive histology (such as: small cell carcinoma, germ-cell tumors, lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma.
  • Metastases in the brain stem, pons or medulla or within 5 mm of optic apparatus
  • Previous cranial radiation
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 1mm margin
GTV expanded by 1 mm
PTV Diameter < 2.0 cm receives 24 Gy; PTV Diameter 2.0-3.0 cm receives 18 Gy; PTV Diameter 3.1-4.0 cm receives 15 Gy;
EXPERIMENTAL: 3mm margin
GTV expanded by 3 mm
PTV Diameter < 2.0 cm receives 24 Gy; PTV Diameter 2.0-3.0 cm receives 18 Gy; PTV Diameter 3.1-4.0 cm receives 15 Gy;

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
12-month Local Control Rate
Time Frame: 12 months after SRS
The 12-month local control rate is the percentage of lesions without recurrence at the lesion site 12 months after SRS. Time to local recurrence was defined as the time between SRS and local recurrence. If local recurrence did not occur, the time to local recurrence was censored at last follow-up (including deaths without local recurrence). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to describe the time to local recurrence.
12 months after SRS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Radionecrosis at SRS Treatment Site
Time Frame: 24 months after SRS
The rate of radionecrosis is defined as the proportion of lesions with an indication of radiation-associated changes but no evidence of viable tumor on follow-up imaging (and confirmed by tissue biopsy whenever possible).
24 months after SRS
12 Month Rate of Distant Brain Metastases
Time Frame: 12 month after SRS
The 12-month rate of distant brain metastases is defined as the percentage of participants with the appearance of new brain metastasis located away from the previously treated lesion (i.e. distant brain failure) 12 months after SRS. Time to the appearance of new brain metastasis was defined as the time between SRS and distant brain failure. Patients without new distant brain metastases as of the last follow-up were censored at the last follow-up date. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to describe the time to distant brain failure.
12 month after SRS
Median Overall Survival
Time Frame: 24 months after SRS
Overall survival was defined as the time in months from the start of SRS to the date of death or last contact if alive. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival.
24 months after SRS
Quality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months after SRS
Quality of life as measured by the change in FACT-Br scores from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The FACT-Br (version 4) is comprised of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), a 27-item core questionnaire evaluating the domains of physical, family/social, emotional and functional well-being, with the addition of 23 brain cancer specific questions. The FACT-G total score is the sum of the four FACT-G domain scores. The Brain Cancer Subscale (BrCS) is the sum of 19 brain cancer specific questions. The FACT-Br Trial Outcome Index (TOI) is the sum of the BrCS score and the physical and family/social domain scores. The FACT-Br total score is the sum of the FACT-G total score and the BrCS score. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Positive change scores indicate improved quality of life.
Baseline to 3 months after SRS
Cognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months after SRS
Cognition as measured by the change in MMSE scores from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The MMSE is an 11-item measure that tests five areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall and language. The minimum score is 0 and teh maximum score is 30 with higher MMSe scores indicating better cognition. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Positive change scores indicate improved cognition.
Baseline to 3 months after SRS
Cognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months after SRS
Cognition as measured by the change in scores on the Trail Making Test (TMT) from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The TMT consists of two parts. Part A (TMT-A) requires an individual to draw lines sequentially connecting 25 encircled numbers distributed on a sheet of paper. Task requirements are similar for Part B (TMT-B) except the person must alternate between numbers and letters (e.g., 1, A, 2, B, 3, C, etc.). The score on each part represents the amount of time required to complete the task. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Negative change scores indicate improved cognition.
Baseline to 3 months after SRS
Rate of Death Due to Neurologic Causes
Time Frame: 24 months after SRS
The rate of death due to neurologic causes is defined as the percentage of participants whose death is attributable to the progression of neurological disease.
24 months after SRS

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Kirkpatrick, MD, PhD, Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Subscribe