CYP2C9 Activity Evaluated With a Simple Finger Prick

January 10, 2011 updated by: University Hospital, Geneva

Evaluation of the CYP2C9 Activity With Dried Blood Spots on Filter Paper Obtained With a Simple Finger Prick

The cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP) are the major drug-metabolizing enzyme system in humans. A great inter- individual variability affects the activity of these enzymes, and consequently the plasma drug concentrations resulting in different pharmacodynamic effects and occurrence of effect sides. Environmental factors, diet, drugs or genetics are responsible for this variability. Genetic factors are very important since the majority of these enzymes are highly polymorphic. For example, over 80 CYP2D6 allelic variants have been discovered so far and are associated to the absence, a decrease, or an increase in enzyme activity. Most polymorphisms were detected by adverse reactions occurring in a group within the population after normal doses of drugs had been administrated. Those patients experiencing adverse reactions often had a reduced capability to metabolize certain drugs. In clinical therapy, this variability has important consequences including the lack of response to a treatment and/or adverse drug reactions. In order to reduce these potentially unwanted events possibly leading to sever adverse reactions or death, it might therefore be of decisive interest to be able to assess the activity of these enzymes at the individual level. Two approaches may be used to assess CYPs activities, genotype and phenotype. Genotype is based on DNA analysis and polymorphism detection. Phenotype consists of administration of "model" drug or probe drug metabolized by a specific CYP and a determination of a ratio between the drug and its metabolite in plasma or urine. The principal drawback of the phenotyping methods is the urine collection overnight or at least 8 hours after the administration of probe test. This procedure is very tedious and time consuming for the patient as well as for the medical staff. The test can be performed in plasma or blood 1-2 hours after probe administration. However, this procedure is invasive and needs an important volume of blood (6 ml). Recently, a novel approach has been developed for the quantitative determination of circulating drug concentrations using dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper obtained with a simple finger prick. Due to the small blood volume required (about 10 µL) compared to conventional sampling, this minimally invasive method provides a patient-friendly alternative for blood collection in patient population where venous sampling is unethical or impossible (pediatrics).

In addition, DBS sampling does not require the use of anticoagulant, plasma separation and decreases contact with infectious material. Furthermore, dried blood spots can be easily stored and shipped to analytical laboratories without using refrigerated devices.

Thanks to the new developments in analytical techniques (mass spectrometry), which permit quantitative analysis from very small volume of blood. DBS sampling represents a powerful tool for the biomedical analyses, particularly in pharmacokinetic studies where several blood samples are needed and for phenotyping procedures.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Geneva 14, Switzerland, 1211
        • University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic to the administrated drugs
  • Contact lense
  • History of peptic ulcer or digestive bleeding
  • Long QT
  • Impaired hepatic tests (ASAT, ALAT, GGT, BILI)
  • Taking drugs interacting with CYP2C9 activity
  • Concomitant disease interacting with CYP2C9 activity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: flurbiprofen 50mg po
assessment of flurbiprofen plasmatic and capillary rates
Experimental: flurbiprofen 50 mg po + CYP2C9 inducer
assessment of flurbiprofen plasmatic and capillary rates
Experimental: flurbiprofen 50 mg po + CYP2C9 inhibitor
assessment of flurbiprofen plasmatic and capillary rates

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Flurbiprofen plasma and capillary rates in presence/absence of CYP2C9 inhibitor or inducer
Time Frame: 3 singles days spaced out with one week wash-out periods
3 singles days spaced out with one week wash-out periods

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Correlation between CYP2C9 Genotype and Phenotype
Time Frame: one day
one day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2011

Last Verified

December 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Volunteers

Clinical Trials on flurbiprofen

Subscribe