Strict or Liberal Insulin Protocol Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery (SLIP)

January 5, 2022 updated by: Inova Health Care Services
This research study is designed to better understand post-operative complications as related to the tightness of blood sugar control. It is also hoped that we may learn that a more liberal control of your blood sugars is not inferior to the current strict glucose control. Our ultimate goal is to evaluate if there is any change in the rates of complications between the two groups. We will be comparing the current strict blood glucose control with a more liberal target for blood sugars.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hyperglycemia is commonly encountered following cardiac surgery, whether a patient has a history of diabetes or not. Hyperglycemia has been associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality; several studies have demonstrated that glycemic control utilizing insulin protocols improves operative mortality, lowers operative morbidity (mediastinitis, atrial fibrillation), and improves long-term survival. However, the optimal target for serum glucose has not been established in post-CABG patients.

Methods:

All CABG patients will be consented prior to surgery. Inclusion criteria for non-diabetic patient is a random fingerstick blood glucose (FSBG) above >150 mg/dL prior, during, or immediately following surgery. All patients with history of diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type II) will be immediately eligible for inclusion.

Following CABG surgery, if the patient was started intra-operatively on an insulin infusion, then that patient will be randomized to one of two treatment target groups: Group 1 [Blood Glucose (BG): 80 mg/dL-120 mg/dL] or Group 2 [BG: 121-180 mg/dL]. The randomization design will be a 1:1 allocation of patients between the two groups, with both diabetic and non-diabetic patients enrolled in both arms of the study. Patients will be maintained on an electronic-based protocol of intravenous insulin for a minimum of 72 hrs postoperatively. Patients remaining in the CVICU greater than 72 hrs will have their intravenous insulin continued until transfer to the step-down unit.

The Glucommander© will be programmed to adjust the insulin drip to one of these two target groups. The nursing staff will not be blinded to treatment group allocation. The primary endpoint with be a composite of operative death, major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, re-vascularization), STS Defined Major Morbidity (re-operation, Cerebrovascular accident, Deep Sternal Wound Infection/Mediastinitis, Prolonged Ventilatory Support (> 24 hrs), Acute Renal Failure), and prolonged inotropic support. The pre-specified sub-group analysis will compare perioperative outcome of patients with diabetes vs non-diabetic patients.

Hypothesis:

Our hypothesis is that the perioperative outcome of Group 2 [BG: 121 - 180 mg/dL] will not be inferior to Group 1 [BG: 80-120 mg/dL]. We anticipate significantly more hypoglycemic events in Group 1.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
        • Inova Fairfax Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All diabetic patients going for isolated, non-emergent CABG surgery at Inova Fairfax Hospital (IFH).
  2. Non diabetic patients going for isolated, non-emergent CABG Surgery at IFH that are found to have a finger stick blood glucose > 150 mg/dl, either pre-operative, during the procedure or post-operatively.
  3. Those patients that meet Inclusion Criteria #1 OR #2 AND have been started on an insulin infusion while in the operative room will be enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients that are not undergoing CABG surgery.
  2. Patients that post-CABG surgery are not on an insulin infusion.
  3. Patients that are undergoing other procedures in addition to CABG will be excluded. (ie. CABG + valve repair)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: STRICT Glucose Control (80-120 mg/dL)
The STRICT arm of the study will have a target Blood Glucose level ranging from 80-120 mg/dL. This is currently the standard of care for post CABG patients.
Active Comparator: LIBERAL (Target Glucose:121-180 mg/dL)
The LIBERAL arm of the study will have a target Blood Glucose level ranging from 121-180 mg/dL. As opposed to the standard of less than 120 mg/dL.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Operative death, major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, re-vascularization), re-operation, Cerebrovascular accident, Deep Sternal Wound Infection, Prolonged Ventilatory Support, Acute Renal Failure, and prolonged inotropic support.
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The second pre-specified endpoint will be all-cause mortality at 90 days.
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Niv Ad, MD, Inova Heart & Vascular Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Disease

Clinical Trials on LIBERAL

Subscribe