Effects of Vitamin D Dose and Genotype of the Binding Protein in Infants and Children (VitaD)

August 2, 2014 updated by: Thomas Carpenter, Yale University

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation in Infants and Children: Effects of Vitamin D Dose and Genotype of the Binding Protein

The purpose of this study is to determine if the vitamin D binding protein genotype influences circulating vitamin D levels and if it may have functional consequences on vitamin D activity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Vitamin D has recently been the subject of much attention. Advantages to the prevention of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) in young children are obvious: acutely, hypocalcemic seizures may occur in VDD, and rickets can result in long-term skeletal deformities. Previous research has emphasized the importance of identifying optimal supplementation doses and appropriate target thresholds for circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), the best described marker of vitamin D status. The timely next step is to objectively establish effective doses for the prevention of VDD, without creating risk from overzealous supplementation, in a population representative of those most at risk for overt disease.

Although the primary role of vitamin D is considered to be its effect on intestinal calcium absorption, enormous variability of fractional calcium absorption in relation to 25-OHD levels exists. We provide evidence that a significant component of this variability is genetic in nature and in particular, relates to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) genotype.

The aggregate data suggest that the critical mechanism for the development of nutritional rickets is reduction in availability of calcium to the skeleton, which is largely determined by vitamin D status and intestinal calcium absorption. Our proposal focuses on the establishment of a workable definition of vitamin D deficiency in an underserved and highly vulnerable population and to assess the impact of genetic variance in VDR and DBP as factors to be considered in the recommendation of vitamin D status assessment, taking into account the outcome of 25-OHD level, and in additional studies, potential functional consequences of vitamin D related to both its classical and non-classical effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

193

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 6 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 6 months to 6 years of age
  • healthy or free from any diseases or conditions that may affect nutritional status or bone metabolism
  • willingness of family to participate in a 6-month study of vitamin D supplementation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic disease
  • Prematurity < 32 weeks gestational age
  • Liver disease such as hepatitis or renal/urologic disease (e.g., recurrent urinary tract infection)
  • Use of pharmacologic or prescription-level dosages of vitamin D or its metabolites. We will exclude users of any systemic glucocorticoid preparation and users of inhaled steroids that are considered greater than medium dose for age 4 yrs. Specifically, this would exclude users of over 1 mg/day of budesonide, and over 352 mcg/day of fluticasone.
  • Current or recent (within 1 month) use of anticonvulsants or other medications known to affect bone and mineral homeostasis or alkaline phosphatase levels.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in serum 25-OH vitamin D
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas O Carpenter, M.D., Yale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D

Subscribe