Optivista : I-SCAN OE for Optical Diagnosis of Small Colon Polyps (Optivista)

This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the new Optivista system compared to the iScan for his optical diagnosis and interval agreement monitoring with pathology. The Participants will be randomized to be diagnosed by either Optivista or Pentax iScan, and all polyps detected during the procedure, their size, location and morphology will be recorded according to the Paris classification after which all polyps will be resected per standard practices and sent for histopathologic evaluation. Further optical assessments will be performed for all polyps of 1-10 mm in size (WASP, NICE, SANO and SIMPLE classification) after with an analysis of comparison between optical diagnosis and pathology results will be performed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The benefit of colonoscopy screening is based on the detection and removal of polyps neoplastic. However, the vast majority of found polyps do not harbor any risk of non-cancer neoplastic. The resection evaluation and histopathology of these polyps are associated with costs while the contribution to cancer prevention is limited. A new technique (Pentax Optivista) based on visual diagnosis of polyps has been introduced to reduce the costs associated with over-screening, and seems to be more efficient than the Pentax iScan technique.

This research project aims to evaluate the new Optivista system compared to the iScan for his optical biopsy performance and interval agreement monitoring with pathology.

This is a prospective clinical trial for which participants are recruited directly from the colonoscopy clinic. The Participants will be randomized to be diagnosed by either Optivista or Pentax iScan. Endoscope withdrawal will be done in iScan 1 mode for patients randomized to iSan and in Optivista OE2 mode for patients randomized to Optivista.

For all polyps detected during the procedure, their size, location and morphology will be recorded according to the Paris classification after which all polyps will be resected per standard practices and sent for histopathologic evaluation.

Polyps that are between 1-10mm in size (diminutive and small polyps), there will be further assessed according to WASP, NICE, SANO and SIMPLE classifications using white light imaging and using an image-enhancing endoscopy technology that enhances visualisation of the polyp surface and vascular patterns.

Concordance between optical diagnosis and pathology monitoring according to recommendations will be presented as proportions with a 95% CI. The features optical polyp diagnostic test for overall diminutive (1-5mm) polyps and by location in the colon (proximal, distal, colon and rectosigmoid segments) will be presented. For outcome measures secondary factors, including factors that may influence the optical diagnosis, proportional estimates with a 95% confidence interval (CI) will be presented. Concordance between strategies is examined using a marginal homogeneity test (Stuart-Maxwell test). For the comparison of proportions, a chi square test or a Fisher's exact two-sided test will be used, as appropriate.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

411

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be recruited at the endoscopy unit at the CHUM, before undergoing an elective colonoscopy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent
  • Aged 45 to 80 years
  • Indication for full colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known inflammatory bowel disease
  • Active colitis
  • Coagulopathy
  • Familial polyposis syndrome
  • Poor general health defined as an ASA class > 3
  • Emergency colonoscopies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Optical diagnosis with Optivista
Participants for which the optical diagnosis of detected colorectal polyps will be done with the new technique Pentax Optivista.
This strategy uses image enhancing techniques and optical diagnosis instead of histopathology assessment with 2 Pentax optical imaging systems (either Optivista or iScan).
Optical diagnosis with iScan
Participants for which the optical diagnosis of detected colorectal polyps will be done with the oldest technique Pentax iScan.
This strategy uses image enhancing techniques and optical diagnosis instead of histopathology assessment with 2 Pentax optical imaging systems (either Optivista or iScan).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance of Optical diagnosis with the pathology based reference standard
Time Frame: 12 months
The Optical diagnosis of polyps using Optivista or iScan will be compared with the pathology based reference standard.
12 months
Rate of polyps detected of both of the technologies (Optivista and iScan) for Optical diagnosis
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Negative predictive value of rectosigmoid neoplastic polyps.
Time Frame: 12 months
Secondary outcomes and data collection include test characteristics, particularly the negative predictive value of rectosigmoid neoplastic polyps.
12 months
Concordance of biopsies with WASP classification
Time Frame: 12 months
Verification of concordance (yes/no) between histopathological results (biopsies) and WASP classification for polyps up to 10mm in size in conjunction with iScan and Optivista (depending on randomization).
12 months
Concordance of biopsies and SIMPLE classification
Time Frame: 12 months
Verification of concordance (yes/no) between histopathological results (biopsies) and SIMPLE classification for polyps up to 10mm in size in conjunction with iScan and Optivista (depending on randomization).
12 months
Concordance of biopsies and SANO classification
Time Frame: 12 months
Verification of concordance (yes/no) between histopathological results (biopsies) and SANO classification for polyps up to 10mm in size in conjunction with iScan and Optivista (depending on randomization).
12 months
Concordance of biopsies and NICE classification
Time Frame: 12 months
Verification of concordance (yes/no) between histopathological results (biopsies) and NICE classification for polyps up to 10mm in size in conjunction with iScan and Optivista (depending on randomization).
12 months
Surveillance recommendation following the colonoscopy
Time Frame: 12 months
The proportion of patients for whom an immediate surveillance recommendation following the colonoscopy can be directly provided for each approach and how often histopathology polyp examination would have been avoided when using each strategy will be examined.
12 months
Evaluate Polyp-Based Resect and Discard model
Time Frame: 12 months
Surveillance interval agreement of the PBRD strategy compared with pathology-based management according to the 2020 USMSTF guidelines.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel von Renteln, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Research Center (CRCHUM)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 9, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17.135

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colo-rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Screening colonoscopy according to resect-and-discard strategy

3
Subscribe