Evaluate Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics (Compare)

January 23, 2025 updated by: Celltrion

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Phase I/IIb Study to Evaluate Initial Safety and Efficacy, Comparative Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity for CT-P6 and Herceptin in Metastatic Breast Cancer

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate equivalent pharmacokinetics (PK)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Patients will receive CT-P6 or Herceptin.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

143

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Are females
  • Have a Her 2 over-expression
  • Have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current clinical or radiographic evidence central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • Current Known infection
  • Pregnant or nursing mother

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CT-P6 & Paclitaxel

CT-P6 was administered at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg body weight by IV infusion over 90 minutes on Day 1, Cycle 1, then at 6 mg/kg repeated at 3-weekly intervals until disease progression, death, or discontinuation.

Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 175 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA) as a continuous 3-hour IV infusion on the day following the first dose of study drug (CT-P6). If the first dose of study drug was well tolerated, subsequent doses of paclitaxel were given immediately after the next dose of study drug. Paclitaxel cycles were repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, or discontinuation.

CT-P6: administered every 3 weeks
Paclitaxel: administered every 3 weeks
Active Comparator: Herceptin & Paclitaxel

Herceptin was administered at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg body weight by IV infusion over 90 minutes on Day 1, Cycle 1, then at 6 mg/kg repeated at 3-weekly intervals until disease progression, death, or discontinuation.

Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 175 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA) as a continuous 3-hour IV infusion on the day following the first dose of study drug (Herceptin). If the first dose of study drug was well tolerated, subsequent doses of paclitaxel were given immediately after the next dose of study drug. Paclitaxel cycles were repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, or discontinuation.

Paclitaxel: administered every 3 weeks
Herceptin: administered every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • Trastuzumab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve at Steady State (AUCss)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 hours predose
Area under the concentration time curve at steady state (AUCss), defined as area under the concentration-time curve between Cycle 8 to Cycle 9. The primary endpoint was reached at 6 months (8 treatment cycle; Main Study Treatment Period).
3, 6, 12, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 hours predose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trough Concentration at Steady State (CtroughSS)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 hours predose
Trough concentration at steady state (CtroughSS), defined as trough concentration at steady state. The secondary endpoint was reached at 6 months (8 treatment cycle; Main Study Treatment Period).
3, 6, 12, 24, 72, 168, 336, 504 hours predose
Cardiotoxicity
Time Frame: Up to approximately 1 year
Cardiac Ejection Fraction Assessment, defined as Mean change from baseline to endpoint assessment in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, Unit: %) from the independent tumor review committee (ITRC).
Up to approximately 1 year
Immunogenicity
Time Frame: every 4 cycles (each cycle is 3 weeks), Up to approximately 5.5 years
Immunogenicity, defined as proportion of patients with antibodies to study drug (positive for antidrug antibody [ADA] result after the first study infusion).
every 4 cycles (each cycle is 3 weeks), Up to approximately 5.5 years
Overall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] Plus Partial Response [PR]) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
Time Frame: every 6 weeks (up to cycle 4) or 12 weeks (after cycle 4) (every cycle is 3 weeks), up to 6 months in Main treatment period and up to 1 year

Overall response rate (ORR) based on best overall response (BOR) during the Main Study Treatment Period and up to 1-year treatment from the independent tumor review committee (ITRC) and Investigator.

ORR (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]), as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 To be assigned a best ORR of PR or CR, changes in tumour assessments must be confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were met.

every 6 weeks (up to cycle 4) or 12 weeks (after cycle 4) (every cycle is 3 weeks), up to 6 months in Main treatment period and up to 1 year
Serum Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER-2) Shed Antigen Value
Time Frame: day 1 of each cycle (every cycle is 3 weeks), Up to approximately 5.5 years
Serum Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) shed antigen values at baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) and the last assessments.
day 1 of each cycle (every cycle is 3 weeks), Up to approximately 5.5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Investigational Site, Samsung Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

March 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on CT-P6

Subscribe