Induction of Labor in Term Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Comparison Between Oxytocin and Dinoprostone Followed Six Hours Later by Oxytocin

April 8, 2011 updated by: Erzincan Military Hospital

Prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) is most commonly defined as rupture of membranes before the onset of labor and occurs in 8% of term pregnancies. A prolonged interval from rupture of membranes to delivery is associated with an increase in the incidence of chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis. The management of the term patients with PROM, especially those with an unfavorable cervix, remains controversial. Management options to choose from are immediate induction of labor versus delayed induction or expectant management. Several reports have detailed an increase in maternal and neonatal morbidity with expectant management, whereas active management leads to a shorter interval from PROM to delivery, reducing the risk of postnatal infections. In addition, active management is preferred by patients.

The investigators know that, neonatal intensive care admission, variable decelerations, and primary cesarean delivery rates are positively correlated with a longer admission-to-labor-onset interval in women with PROM . So, to reduce the induction to delivery times, concurrent oxytocin infusion with dinoprostone vaginal pessary use for labor induction in women with PROM may be beneficial. Several studies have shown shorter induction-to-delivery interval with concurrent oxytocin infusion with prostaglandin agent at initiation of labor . However, in these studies, there is a a paucity information in PROM labor induction. Only one randomized control trial have compared the efficacy of concurrent dinoprostone and oxytocin and oxytocin alone in women with term PROM . This study indicated that concurrent vaginal dinoprostone and intravenous oxytocin conferred no advantage over intravenous oxytocin alone for the outcomes of interest, including length of labor patient satisfaction or risk for cesarean delivery. Unfortunately, this study was limited by small sample size.

The aims of this randomized study was to compare two protocols (oxytocin vs. sustained-release dinoprostone followed six hours later by oxytocin) for induction of labour in women with PROM at term and an unfavorable cervix.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

225

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Yanimahalle
      • İstanbul, Yanimahalle, Turkey, 34142
        • Bakırkoy Women and Children Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with a live singleton fetus at term [37-42 weeks of gestation in cephalic presentation
  • reactive nonstress test (NST)
  • presenting with PROM
  • a Bishop score of 5 or less before the onset of labor
  • an absence of spontaneous contractions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women in active labor
  • previous uterine surgery,
  • antepartum hemorrhage,
  • chorioamnionitis,
  • contraindication to prostaglandin use (bronchial asthma, glaucoma), *contraindication to vaginal delivery,
  • multiple pregnancy,
  • non-vertex presentation
  • major fetal anomalies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: oxytocin group
2 milliunits/min and doubled every 30 minutes to a maximum of 32 milliunits/min or until four contractions in 10 minutes was achieved
A standard intravenous oxytocin was administered 6 hours after the insertion of the vaginal pessary. An initial dose of 2 mU/min was increased at 30 minute intervals by 2 mU/min to a maximum dose 32 mU/min or until four contractions in 10 minutes was achieved. Once started, oxytocin infusion was continued to delivery unless otherwise indicated. The pessary has been removed if it was still present 12 h after placement; or if worrisome FHR pattern persisted
Experimental: dinoprostone and oxytocin
a single dose sustained-released dinoprostone into the posterior vaginal fornix. A standard intravenous oxytocin was administered 6 hours after the insertion of the vaginal pessary. An initial dose of 2 mU/min was increased at 30 minute intervals by 2 mU/min to a maximum dose 32 mU/min or until four contractions in 10 minutes was achieved
a single dose sustained-released dinoprostone into the posterior vaginal fornix. A standard intravenous oxytocin was administered 6 hours after the insertion of the vaginal pessary. An initial dose of 2 mU/min was increased at 30 minute intervals by 2 mU/min to a maximum dose 32 mU/min or until four contractions in 10 minutes was achieved

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the number (rate) of women who succeeded in delivering vaginally within 24 h of the initiation of the labor induction protocol
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
labor induction-to-delivery interval
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

April 6, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor

Clinical Trials on SYNPITAN FORT 5 IU

Subscribe