Gait and Postural Stability Assessment in Children With Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spine Instrumentation

March 18, 2013 updated by: Sahar Hassani, Shriners Hospitals for Children
The goal of this study is to evaluate children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis who are undergoing spinal fusion using motion analysis, balance, and outcome questionnaires. Little research has been done to evaluate how different fusion levels impact walking patterns, range of motion, posture and balance following spine instrumentation in children with idiopathic scoliosis. Debate still continues whether posterior spinal instrumentation with the last instrumented vertebra at or above Lumbar 3 (L3) will provide sufficient spine correction, greater motion, and better posture and balance when compared to a child with instrumentation at Lumbar 4 (L4). Furthermore, how does the spine fusion endpoint (last instrumented vertebra) impact quality of life, participation, and impairment in children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and how do they compare to healthy age-matched peers. The goal of this study is to compare these two end points using gait analysis, postural stability, and outcome tools with the hopes of providing better clinical care to children with idiopathic scoliosis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study population will include sixty (60) children with idiopathic scoliosis who will undergo spine surgery and sixty (60) developing children "Control Group". Scoliosis patients will undergo a period of testing which requires three visits: pre-operative evaluation, one-year post-operative evaluation, and two-year post-operative evaluation. The Control Group will require one initial assessment. A total of 240 evaluations will be performed over a three-year period. We will evaluate the correlation among outcome tools and quantitative measures in order to determine how these instruments can be used more effectively for better treatment. Subjects and their parents will be fully informed of the nature of the study as well as the potential risk involved and sign the appropriate consent form. The study will be reviewed by the IRB and include HIPAA compliance. This will be accomplished during testing at the Shriners Hospital for Children- Chicago Motion Analysis Lab. All possible steps will be taken to assure the safety and convenience of the study participants. All subjects will be evaluated using clinical outcome tools (PODCI, SF-36) and will undergo quantitative 3-D motion analysis and postural stability assessment. Quantitative 3-D gait analysis will be done with our 14-camera Motion Capture system and passive reflective markers (Figure 3). Motion analysis will be performed with each subject walking at a comfortable and natural speed on the laboratory walkway. Passive markers will be attached to anatomic landmarks in standardized locations using double-backed tape. Marker coordinate data will be used to determine range of motion and joint angles.

Four forceplates will be used to measure kinetic data and static balance. Postural stability testing will be performed on all subjects (Figure 4). We will evaluate responses to dynamic stability challenges that investigates motor and sensory control and adaptation to perturbations. Static (quiet standing) postural stability tests will be done on all subjects. A licensed physical therapist (PT) will perform the exam following the protocol of the Shriners Hospital for Children's motion lab.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60707
        • Shriners Hospitals for Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 20 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis that have a Cobb angle greater than 50 degrees.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • idiopathic scoliosis
  • between the ages of 10 - 20
  • need a spine fusion at L4 or above
  • can walk on your own
  • have not had surgery on spine before

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis
vertebrae are fused to straighten a spinal curve

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motion Analysis
Time Frame: Pre-Operation visit (within 1 week prior to surgical date)
Gait and standing spine range of motion are measured using a 3-D motion capture system.
Pre-Operation visit (within 1 week prior to surgical date)
Motion Analysis
Time Frame: 1 Year Post-Operative
Gait and standing spine range of motion are measured using a 3-D motion capture system.
1 Year Post-Operative
Motion Analysis
Time Frame: 2 Years Post-Operative
Gait and standing spine range of motion are measured using a 3-D motion capture system.
2 Years Post-Operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Questionnaires
Time Frame: Collected at Pre-Operative visit (1 week prior to surgical date)
A functional outcome questionnaire filled out by the parents and patient.
Collected at Pre-Operative visit (1 week prior to surgical date)
Functional Questionnaires
Time Frame: Collected at 1 year post-operative visit
A functional outcome questionnaire filled out by the parents and patient.
Collected at 1 year post-operative visit
e-med plantar pressures
Time Frame: Collected at Pre-Operative visit (1 week prior to surgical visit)
A pressure map of the plantar surface of the foot during walking.
Collected at Pre-Operative visit (1 week prior to surgical visit)
Postural Stability
Time Frame: Pre-Operative (1 week prior to surgical visit)
Standing balance and postural stability are measured using a NeuroCom Equitest System and Twin Forceplate system.
Pre-Operative (1 week prior to surgical visit)
Functional Questionnaires
Time Frame: Collected at 2 year follow up
A functional outcome questionnaire filled out by the parents and patient.
Collected at 2 year follow up
e-med plantar pressures
Time Frame: Collected at 1 year follow up
A pressure map of the plantar surface of the foot during walking.
Collected at 1 year follow up
e-med plantar pressure
Time Frame: 2 year follow up
A pressure map of the plantar surface of the foot during walking.
2 year follow up
Postural Stability
Time Frame: 1 Year post-operative visit
Standing balance and postural stability are measured using a NeuroCom Equitest System and Twin Forceplate system.
1 Year post-operative visit
Postural Stability
Time Frame: 2 year post-operative follow up
Standing balance and postural stability are measured using a NeuroCom Equitest System and Twin Forceplate system.
2 year post-operative follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sahar Hassani, MS, Shriners Hosptials for Children

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

April 22, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 19, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AIS-2010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scoliosis

Clinical Trials on posterior spine fusion

Subscribe