Improving Clinical PET/CT Image Quality in Retrospectively Reconstructed Breath-Hold Images

March 15, 2012 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

The patient has been referred for an FDG PET/CT scan. FDG is a form of sugar that contains a small amount of radioactivity; it is used to see the size and possible spread of cancer in the body.

Pictures of the body are taken on a machine called a PET/CT scanner. The purpose of this current study is to see if we, the investigators, can take clearer pictures of the tumor than we could with our routine scan method. This would allow us to better see how FDG is picked up by the tumor. PET/CT is presently one of the best tools for detecting cancer and determining its spread in the body. However, due to breathing motion, PET and CT images may become blurred and the location of the tumor on CT and PET images may not match. We have developed a new method that enables us to reduce image blurring and to measure the tumor more accurately on PET images. In this study we want to compare two kinds of images: those from the standard PET/CT scan, and the PET/CT scan pictures taken with our new method.

If successful, we may use this new method for clinical routine in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients scheduled for whole body FDG PET/CT examination as part of their routine clinical care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is capable of providing written consent.
  • 18 years of age or older.
  • Patient with a known or suspected FDG-avid malignancy in the torso

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Breath-Hold PET/CT image
In addition to the standard clinical PET/CT images, we will provide a breath-hold PET/CT image set, using the same PET data for both.
Other: Breath-Hold PET/CT image set
In addition to the standard clinical PET/CT images, we will provide a breath-hold PET/CT image set, using the same PET data for both. In order to spatially match PET, and therefore improve attenuation correction in the PET images, we will acquire a Breath-Hold CT at 310 mA over the same region covered by PET. The normal-organ doses accumulated from the additional 30 mA CT. The patient's breathing signal during CT and the whole body PET will be recorded using a video camera and in house developed software. We will compare the clinical PET/CT and Breath-Hold PET/CT in regards to lesion detection, lesion volume, and SUV quantification.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine if our breath-hold acquisition technique can be implemented in whole-body PET/CT scans.
Time Frame: at the time of scan
Because PET events not satisfying the breathing amplitude selection criteria will be dropped off the final image set, it will be necessary to increase the acquisition time for the FOV's covering the thorax area from 3 min/bed to 5 min/bed to compensate for the reduction in statistics. This should result in a total increase of ~6 min for the whole body scan.
at the time of scan

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine if whole body PET/CT improves spatial matching of PET and CT
Time Frame: at the time of scan
to compare image quality, blurring, PET-to-CT mis-match, and lesion SUV of the standard PET images with the breath-hold ones.
at the time of scan

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 16, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10-054

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe