Feasibility, Acceptability, and Safety of Neonatal Male Circumcision in Lusaka, Zambia

July 12, 2012 updated by: University of Alabama at Birmingham

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Safety of Neonatal Male Circumcision at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia and in the Lusaka District in Zambia Using Gomco; Plastibell; and Mogen Methods

In this study of neonatal male circumcision (NMC), the investigators will examine acceptability of among parents, feasibility of training providers and implementing services in various clinical settings, and the safety of service provision comparing three different surgical methods: the Gomco; the Plastibell; and the Mogen clamp. This operational study is being conducted to inform the scale up of neonatal male circumcision in Zambia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

As male circumcision becomes one component of Zambia's plan to prevent the spread of HIV, it is important to understand the acceptability, feasibility, and safety of implementing NMC services in various clinical settings.

In this study, we will examine the acceptability of neonatal male circumcision among parents in several ways. First, we will administer a structured questionnaire on NMC to 1000 consenting parents of newborn boys at a tertiary care institution and 1-2 primary care clinics in Lusaka. All parents approached, regardless of whether or not they complete the survey, will also be offered an opportunity to have their sons circumcised. Uptake will be calculated as the percent of parents approached who consent for their sons to be circumcised. Finally, we will assess parental satisfaction with results of the procedure.

To examine the feasibility of training providers and implementing neonatal male circumcision services in various clinical settings, we will train a group of 15-20 health care providers in three different circumcision methods (Gomco clamp, Mogen clamp, and Plastibell) at 2-3 study sites. We will recruit 600 infants to be circumcised during the training. We will use structured questionnaires and skill assessments to evaluate provider competence after completing the training curriculum, provider preferences among the three circumcision methods, and opinion about how NMC should be scaled up within the existing health care system. We will also document logistical difficulties of scaling up NMC services at the study sites.

Finally, we will examine the safety of implementing NMC by collecting and analyzing data on complications resulting from the different circumcision methods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

661

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lusaka, Zambia
        • University Teaching Hospital and Matero Reference Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 4 weeks (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male infants who are in the first day of life (including infants < 24 hours old) and up to 4 weeks of age will be considered for circumcision
  • Gestational age >37 weeks at birth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any current illness
  • Bleeding diathesis or family history of bleeding disorder
  • Abnormality of urethra or penile shaft such as hypospadias
  • Local infection defined as redness, swelling, or a purulent discharge from the infant penis
  • Greater than four weeks of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Gomco
NMC performed using a Gomco clamp
Circumcision performed on a male infant within the first month of life, using one of 3 devices
Active Comparator: Mogen clamp
NMC performed using a Mogen clamp
Circumcision performed on a male infant within the first month of life, using one of 3 devices
Active Comparator: Plastibell
NMC performed using a Plastibell device
Circumcision performed on a male infant within the first month of life, using one of 3 devices

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication Rate
Time Frame: 0-6 weeks after the circumcision procedure
Includes intra-operative and post-operative complications such as bleeding, infection, and cosmetic problems
0-6 weeks after the circumcision procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uptake of NMC
Time Frame: Ongoing, over the course of the study (1.5 years)
Defined as % of parents of newborn boys approached during recruitment who consent to having their sons cirucumcised
Ongoing, over the course of the study (1.5 years)
Provider Preferences
Time Frame: Upon completion of training in NMC
Measure of provider preferences among 3 circumcision devices being compared
Upon completion of training in NMC
Parent Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 weeks following the circumcision procedure
Score, between 0 and 100, of each parent's satisfaction with the outcome of the NMC procedure
6 weeks following the circumcision procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth M Stringer, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham and Centre for Infectious Disease Research of Zambia
  • Principal Investigator: Kasonde Bowa, MD, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
  • Principal Investigator: John Kachimba, MD, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neonatal Male Circumcision

Clinical Trials on Neonatal male circumcision

Subscribe