Evaluation of Routine Follow-up Coronary Angiography After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trial (ReACT)

March 14, 2017 updated by: Takeshi Morimoto

Randomized Evaluation of Routine Follow-up Coronary Angiography After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary endpoint is a composite of death/myocardial infarction/stroke/emergency hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome/hospitalization for congestive heart failure at 3-year after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Routine follow-up coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary intervention has been performed to detect restenosis in a lot of PCI centers in Japan. On the other hand, previous studies reported that routine follow-up coronary angiography might lead to unnecessary reinterventions in asymptomatic patients. In this situation, the effect of routine follow-up coronary angiography on long-term clinical outcomes remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after PCI compared with clinical follow-up alone. The primary endpoint of this study is a composite of death/myocardial infarction/stroke/emergency hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome/hospitalization for congestive heart failure at three-year after percutaneous coronary intervention. The design of this study is almost all-comer design enrolling patients received PCI without any exclusion criteria.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

700

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kyoto, Japan, 606-8507
        • Division of Cardiology, Kyoto University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients received percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Patients older than 20 years old
  • Patients who will not scheduled any staged percutaneous coronary intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: routine follow-up coronary angiography
routine follow-up coronary angiography at 8-12 after discharge for percutaneous coronary intervention
follow-up coronary angiography at 8-12 months after discharge for percutaneous coronary intervention
Active Comparator: clinical follow-up
no routine follow-up coronary angiography at 8-12 after discharge for percutaneous coronary intervention
no routine follow-up coronary angiography at 8-12 months after discharge for percutaneous coronary intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
a composite of death/myocardial infarction/stroke/emergency hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome/hospitalization for congestive heart failure
Time Frame: 4.8 years
a composite of death/myocardial infarction/stroke/emergency hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome/hospitalization for congestive heart failure
4.8 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
death
Time Frame: 4.8 years
death
4.8 years
cardiac death
Time Frame: 4.8 years
cardiac death
4.8 years
myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 4.8 years
myocardial infarction
4.8 years
stent thrombosis
Time Frame: 4.8 years
stent thrombosis defined bya Academic Reseach Consortium
4.8 years
stroke
Time Frame: 4.8 years
both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke excluding transient ischemic attach
4.8 years
bleeding complications
Time Frame: 4.8 years
bleeding complications defined by GUSTO and TIMI
4.8 years
any coronary revascularization
Time Frame: 4.8 years
any coronary revascularization
4.8 years
clinically-driven coronary revascularization
Time Frame: 4.8 years
clinically-driven coronary revascularization
4.8 years
clinically-driven target-lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 4.8 years
clinically-driven target-lesion revascularization
4.8 years
any target-lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 4.8 years
any target-lesion revascularization
4.8 years
coronary artery bypass grafting
Time Frame: 4.8 years
coronary artery bypass grafting
4.8 years
angina
Time Frame: 4.8 years
angina
4.8 years
renal function
Time Frame: 4.8 years
estimate-glomerular filtration rate
4.8 years
emergency hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome
Time Frame: 4.8 years
emergency hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome
4.8 years
hospitalization for congestive heart failure
Time Frame: 4.8 years
hospitalization for congestive heart failure
4.8 years
composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome
Time Frame: 4.8 years
composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome
4.8 years
follow-up coronary angiography
Time Frame: 4.8 years
presence of follow-up coronary angiography
4.8 years
clinically-driven follow-up coronary angiography
Time Frame: 4.8 years
presence of clinically-driven follow-up coronary angiography
4.8 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Takeshi Kimura, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 14, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on follow-up coronary angiography

3
Subscribe