Melanin Index in Those With Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes I-VI (Melanin Index)

March 17, 2015 updated by: June Robinson, Northwestern University

A Prospective Study of Melanin Index in Those With Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes I-VI

The "gold standard" method of assessing skin pigmentation is spectrophotometry; however, even as early as 1961 the potential for confounding by dilatation of blood vessels was recognized. (Monash 1961) Manual compression was used to express the blood from the field being measured. The red reflectance captured by reflectance spectrophotometer introduced an uncontrollable variable when measuring the tanning /pigmentation response of skin tone/color. Room temperature induced increased or decreased blood flow through the skin, which altered the findings by spectrophotometer. Other potentially confounding variables that changed blood flow were: recent exercise, and the flushing/blushing for emotional reasons. Since these conditions were difficult to reliably control on the sun exposed extremities, spectrophotometry was not a practical method to assess change in melanin over time as an outcome measure for efficacy of sun protection.

Digital imaging with videodermatoscopy utilizing a portable device that is supported by a laptop computer, provides a high resolution digital image for analysis. (EasyScan) As described by Yamamoto et al (2008), applying the Image J freeware to quantify the pigmentation in the digital image holds promise as a practical objective method to reliably assess skin tones based on the melanin content in a non invasive manner. With standardization, the software and hardware may quantify the constitutive pigment in the sun protected skin as the melanin index.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years old
  • fluent in English
  • able to complete the study procedures including answering questionnairs
  • willing to apply ice to left upper inner arm
  • willing to have digital photos, dermatoscopic photos and spectrophometry readings taken of left upper inner arm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have a history of vitiligo or currently has vitiligo
  • use self-tanning products or tan accelerators ont he left upper inner arm int he 4 weeks prior to enrollment
  • history of cold urticaria or conenctive tissue disease such as scleroderma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Digital Camera
Digital camera images will be taken of a a 2cm^2 area of sun protected skin.
Study personnel will induce erythema by sequentially applying ice for approximately 2 minutes to the 2 cm^2 target region of the upper volar arm. This erythema is a reaction to the vasoconstriction caused by skin cooling. The vasoconstriction is visually monitored to determine the onset of the vascular dilation that occurs after cessation of cooling. Images with the Digital Camera, Spectrophotometer and Videodermoscope are re-taken.
Active Comparator: Spectrophotometer
The probe of the protable reflectance spectrophotometer is lightly applied to the sufance of the skin and a reading is taken.
Study personnel will induce erythema by sequentially applying ice for approximately 2 minutes to the 2 cm^2 target region of the upper volar arm. This erythema is a reaction to the vasoconstriction caused by skin cooling. The vasoconstriction is visually monitored to determine the onset of the vascular dilation that occurs after cessation of cooling. Images with the Digital Camera, Spectrophotometer and Videodermoscope are re-taken.
Active Comparator: Videodermoscopy
The instrument is put in contact with sun protected skin and an image is taken of a 2 cm^2 area.
Study personnel will induce erythema by sequentially applying ice for approximately 2 minutes to the 2 cm^2 target region of the upper volar arm. This erythema is a reaction to the vasoconstriction caused by skin cooling. The vasoconstriction is visually monitored to determine the onset of the vascular dilation that occurs after cessation of cooling. Images with the Digital Camera, Spectrophotometer and Videodermoscope are re-taken.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Melanin Index
Time Frame: 2 minutes
Compare the MI obtained by the digital camera, videodermoscope and spectrophotmetry between the usual conditions and after the induction of erythema.
2 minutes
Change in Melanin Index for 3 methods (digital camera, videodermoscope and spectrophotmetry) vs. patient-reported skin type vs. dermatologist-determined skin type
Time Frame: Up to 10 minutes
Correlate the melanin index under usual conditions by each of the 3 methods (digital camera, videodermoscope and spectrophotometry) with the Fitzpatrick skin phyototype as determined by the patients' responses to standard questions, and the dermatologist's determination of skin type.
Up to 10 minutes
Difference in Time to Complete each of the 3 methods (digital camera, videodermoscope and spectrophotometer)
Time Frame: Up to 10 minutes
Compare the time of testing (duration of each test for thes ubject, time spent by the research assistant administering the test) between the digitical camera, videodermoscope and spectrophotometer.
Up to 10 minutes
Desirability and Relevance of Videodermoscopy Image
Time Frame: Up to 10 minutes
Assess desirability and relevance of the image obtained by videodermoscopy to the subject especially with reference to the subject's assessment of their risk of sunburning.
Up to 10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dennis P West, PhD, Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • JR-STU27549

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erythema

Clinical Trials on Induced Erythema

Subscribe