- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02997306
COEBICS: Comparison of Erythema Between Interrupted and Continuous Sutures (COEBICS)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Purpose: This is a randomized, controlled, prospective split-scar study which employs computer-assisted image processing to establish whether simple interrupted or running sutures cause the greatest degree of erythema in the surgical scars resulting from Moh's micrographic surgery (MMS), and to better understand the evolution (including progression and subsequent regression) of erythema over time in these scars.
Hypothesis: Based on the literature review and the clinical experience of the investigators, it is hypothesized that the quantified difference in persisting erythema that is caused by each suturing technique will be minimal and not statistically significant.
Justification: The cosmetic appearance of scars is an important concern for patients undergoing Moh's micrographic surgery (MMS), a specialized therapeutic procedure that is used for high risk skin cancers on the face. Many factors influence the aesthetics of a surgical scar; suturing technique is among the most significant. Simple interrupted stitches and running (continuous) stitches are the two most frequently used suturing techniques. Anecdotal opinions favor one technique over the other. Some authors consider simple interrupted stitches to be more time consuming but allows more precise wound approximation. Other surgeons feel running stitches decrease suture marks. A recent literature search looking at the influence of suturing technique on the cosmetic outcome of scars could not draw any conclusion as to which stitching method should be recommended for facial repair because of the lack of comparative studies. The need for prospective randomized trials in this field is required. Multiple scales have been reported in the literature which can be utilized for cosmetic assessment of healing surgical scars. Persistent scar erythema/dilated peri-scar telangiectasias are a relatively common finding associated with facial surgery and are included as a component in only one of the aforementioned scar evaluation scales. Furthermore, it is only the presence of erythema that is gauged by the scale, and not its intensity or area as these parameters would be challenging to objectively assess. To address this issue, the investigators have developed a software that is capable of quantifying the intensity and area involving erythema in scars. As such, this study has been designed to determine whether simple interrupted or running sutures would cause the greatest degree of erythema and to what extent (both in terms of intensity and area) in the resulting facial MMS scars.
Objectives:
- To determine whether simple interrupted or running sutures cause the greatest degree of persistent erythema in the scars resulting from MMS facial defect repair.
- To determine the percentage difference in the degree of persisting erythema (including intensity and area) caused by each suturing technique.
- To quantitatively assess the evolution of erythema over time in simple interrupted and running sutures to better characterize its patterns of progression and subsequent regression.
Research Design: Prospective randomized controlled split-scar study.
Research Methods: Subjects will be recruited at the Dermatologic Surgery Centre at the VGH Skin Care Centre. They will be offered the option to participate in this study prior to beginning their MMS procedure. All patients/accompanying family members will have adequate time to read the protocol and consent document prior to entering the surgical area. All surgeries will be performed by an experienced dermatologic surgeon and/or an MMS Fellow. The same procedure will be followed for each patient. After ensuring that the length of the scar will be >4cm, patients will be randomized (using computer generated sealed envelope method) to epidermal suturing technique. Depending on randomization, either the superior/medial or inferior/lateral half of the scar will be sutured with running stitches, whereas the other half will be closed with interrupted stitches. All other aspects of the procedures, including post-operative wound care and follow-up, will be similar as those for patients who are not in the study. The subjects will be seen again for follow up at 1 week, 8 weeks, and 6 months following their procedure, which are regularly scheduled for all patients who undergo MMS as part of their ongoing oncologic evaluation and wound care. No additional follow up appointments will be scheduled specifically for the purpose of this study. During each follow up appointment, close-up photographs of the scars will be taken using preset aperture (14), shutter speed (1/60 seconds), and flash settings (+1/3 exposure compensation) on a Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT, CanonMR-14EX ring flash, and Canon EFS 60mmf/2.8 macro lens. All photographs will be taken in the same follow-up room under closely matched lighting parameters and camera angles. Following their final reassessment at 6 months, all interval photos will be processed using the customized software to quantify intensity and area of erythema for each visit.
Statistical analysis: Power calculations have been performed. To detect a difference of 10% in the degree of erythema between the two study arms, with a power of 80%, 100 patients will be recruited. The two study arms are paired since each patient's scar is split into two parts. Subsequently, comparative paired t-tests will be performed on the software-generated values of erythema intensity and area for simple interrupted and running sutures from each interval MMS scar photograph.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: David Zloty, MD, FRCPC
- Phone Number: 604-875-4888
- Email: David.Zloty@vch.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ali Majdzadeh
- Phone Number: 778-887-4040
- Email: amajdzadeh@alumni.ubc.ca
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E8
- Dermatologic Surgery Centre at the Vancouver General Hospital Skin Care Centre
-
Contact:
- David Zloty, MD, FRCPC
- Phone Number: 604-875-4888
- Email: David.Zloty@vch.ca
-
Principal Investigator:
- David Zloty, MD, FRCPC
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ali Majdzadeh
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ardalan Akbari, BSc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects will be included only if the following conditions are all met:
- The subject is 18 years of age or older.
- The subject is presenting with a facial surgical defect after MMS that requires a repair resulting in a scar of more than 4 cm in length.
- The subject is willing and capable of cooperating to the extent and degree required by the protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects will be excluded if any of the following conditions are met:
- The subject has a history of keloidal scarring.
- The subject will require radiation therapy after surgery.
- The subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study within 30 days of proposed study enrolment.
- The subject is not able to fully understand the protocol and consent documents.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Superior/Medial Running Sutures
In this cohort, the running sutures will be randomized to be oriented on Superior/Medial half of the scar, and the remaining half of the scar will be closed with simple interrupted sutures.
|
Simple interrupted stitches and running (continuous) stitches are the two most frequently used suturing techniques.
The erythema secondary to these suturing techniques will be compared by utilizing them side-by-side for closure of post-Moh's surgical defect repair in each patient.
This intervention consists of running sutures being used for closure of the Superior/Medial half of the incision, and interrupted sutures being used on the Inferior/Lateral half of the incision.
|
Experimental: Inferior/Lateral Running Sutures
In this cohort, the running sutures will be randomized to be oriented on Inferior/Lateral half of the scar, and the remaining half of the scar will be closed with simple interrupted sutures.
|
Simple interrupted stitches and running (continuous) stitches are the two most frequently used suturing techniques.
The erythema secondary to these suturing techniques will be compared by utilizing them side-by-side for closure of post-Moh's surgical defect repair in each patient.
This intervention consists of running sutures being used for closure of the Inferior/Lateral half of the incision, and interrupted sutures being used on the Superior/Medial half of the incision.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in the Intensity of Scar Erythema
Time Frame: 1 week, 8 weeks, and 6 months post-operatively
|
The degree of scar erythema post-operatively will be assessed in each half of each patient's scar by quantifying both the intensity and the surface area of erythema.
This will be achieved digitally by employing the customized software developed by the investigators for this purpose.
|
1 week, 8 weeks, and 6 months post-operatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Zloty, MD, FRCPC, Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chuang GS, Leach BC, Wheless L, Lang PG, Cook J. Preoperative expectations and values of patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):311-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01878.x. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
- McLean NR, Fyfe AH, Flint EF, Irvine BH, Calvert MH. Comparison of skin closure using continuous and interrupted nylon sutures. Br J Surg. 1980 Sep;67(9):633-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670908.
- Moy LS. Management of acute wounds. Dermatol Clin. 1993 Oct;11(4):759-66.
- Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW. A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992 Sep;18(9):785-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03036.x.
- Quinn JV, Drzewiecki AE, Stiell IG, Elmslie TJ. Appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations. Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;13(2):229-31. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90100-0.
- Singer AJ, Arora B, Dagum A, Valentine S, Hollander JE. Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7):1892-1897. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000287275.15511.10.
- Sclafani AP, Sclafani JA, Sclafani AM. Successes, revisions, and postoperative complications in 446 Mohs defect repairs. Facial Plast Surg. 2012 Jun;28(3):358-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312691. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- H16-01802
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgical Scar Erythema
-
Ulthera, IncTerminatedSurgical ScarUnited States
-
Lauren CrowRecruitingSurgical Wound | Surgery--Complications | Surgical Site Infection | Scar | Surgical Incision | Hypertrophic ScarUnited States
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedHypertrophic Surgical ScarKorea, Republic of
-
Iran University of Medical SciencesRecruitingDry Needling | Scar Tissue | Hypertrophic Scar | Hypertrophic Surgical Scar | Hypertrophic Scar of Upper Arm (Disorder)United States, Iran, Islamic Republic of
-
Columbia UniversityEthicon, Inc.CompletedEfficiency of Surgical Incision Closure | Post-operative ScarUnited States
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityAllerganUnknown
-
Venus ConceptCompletedBreast Augmentation | Abdominoplasty | Face Lift | Surgical ScarSpain
-
Yale UniversityBiodermisEnrolling by invitationScar | Wound Heal | Surgical Incision | Keloid | Keloid Scar Following Surgery | Scar, HypertrophicUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemAmerican Academy of Cosmetic SurgeryCompletedPost Surgical ScarsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Superior/Medial Running Sutures
-
St Joseph University, Beirut, LebanonGroupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephUnknown
-
Brugmann University HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
Université de MontréalUnknownSurgical Education | Advanced Suturing Skills