Pilot Study to Evaluate Feasibility of DensiProbe Spine Assessing Bone Strength in Spinal Surgery (DensiProbe)

A Prospective Case Series to Evaluate Handling and Feasibility of DensiProbe Spine Assessing Vertebral Bone Strength in Patients Undergoing Transpedicular Fixation of the Spine - a Pilot Study

A new mechanical device was developed in order to provide the surgeon with intraoperative information about the mechanical strength of the cancellous bone within the vertebral body. DensiProbe Spine is intended to be used in patients undergoing transpedicular stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine. The objective of the DensiProbe Spine pilot study is to investigate the handling and feasibility of the DensiProbe Spine measurement device.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Osteoporotic fragility fractures often occur in the spine. A common surgical technique is the transpedicular fixation using pedicle screws. A major complication of this treatment is a cut-out or back-out of the screw due to insufficient anchorage of the implant in the vertebral body.

A new mechanical device was developed in order to provide the surgeon with intraoperative information about the mechanical strength of the cancellous bone. In cases of low bone quality, the treatment can be adapted to the patient's condition, for example by augmentation of the screw anchorage using bone cement. However, this treatment involves a risk of cement leakage and subsequent pulmonary embolism or nerve damage. Furthermore, cement augmentation is time-consuming. Therefore, there is a need for a diagnostic device that can intraoperatively support the surgeon's decision on the appropriate treatment.

DensiProbe Spine was developed accordingly to the clinically approved DensiProbe Hip, which was designed for the same diagnostic reasons in patients with hip fractures undergoing fracture fixation with the dynamic hip screw (DHS). However, the application of bone strength measurements in the spine is in so far different to the hip as the anatomical dimensions in the spine are much smaller and lower values of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone strength are expected.

The objective of this pilot study is to investigate the handling and feasibility of the newly developed DensiProbe Spine measurement device. In case of a positive result of the pilot study, a multicenter cohort study will be performed in order to clinically validate the DensiProbe Spine device by assessing the correlation between DensiProbe Spine measurements and the amounts of pedicle screw migration in patients undergoing transpedicular fixation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BE
      • Bern, BE, Switzerland, 3010
        • Inselspital
      • Bern, BE, Switzerland, 3006
        • Klinik Sonnenhof

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing transpedicular stabilization of the spine

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Indication for transpedicular fixation of the thoracolumbar spine
  • Ability to understand and read local language at an elementary level
  • Signed informed consent by patient or legal guardian to participate in the study according to the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are legally incompetent
  • Scoliosis (Cobb angle on AP radiograph > 10°)
  • Benign or malign vertebral bone tumour
  • Active malignancy
  • Infection diseases, eg. hepatitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Pre-drilling with power-drill
  • Life-threatening condition
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Participation in any other medical device or drug study that could influence the results of the present study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Transpedicular stabilization
Patients undergoing transpedicular stabilization of the spine
Intraoperative DensiProbe Spine measurements

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgeon's compliance- and handling-oriented questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
The general satisfaction of the surgeon with DensiProbe Spine as well as specific problems that are likely to occur during the measurement with DensiProbe Spine will be assessed
Baseline
Intra- and post-operative adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 2 months postsurgery
All intra- and postoperative adverse events will be assessed and analyzed regarding their relationship to the study device
Up to 2 months postsurgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone mineral density
Time Frame: Baseline
The bone mineral density will be measured preoperatively in the lumbar spine (L1-L4) using DXA in order to assess local bone status.
Baseline
Pedicle screw migration
Time Frame: 2 months postsurgery
The migration of the pedicle screw will be performed by measuring the angle between the pedicle screw axis and the caudal endplate. The amount of screw migration is defined as the difference in that angle between the baseline (postoperative) and the two month lateral x-rays
2 months postsurgery
QCT analysis of bone biopsies
Time Frame: Baseline
For each vertebral body under investigation a probe of trabecular bone is obtained to determine bone quality using quantitative micro-CT analysis
Baseline
Application of bone cement
Time Frame: Baseline
For each patient the surgeon decides whether or not augmentation with bone cement is necessary
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lorin M Benneker, MD, University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DensiProbe Spine 2010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Diseases

Clinical Trials on DensiProbe Spine

3
Subscribe