Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis With Platelet Rich Plasma

April 15, 2014 updated by: William Bunnell, Loma Linda University

Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial

The purpose of this investigator-initiated study is to clinically evaluate the efficacy of a new treatment for plantar fasciitis. This treatment consists of a platelet rich plasma injection into the origin of the plantar fascia. It is thought that plasma rich plasma injection will dramatically improve outcomes for patients suffering from plantar fasciitis.

Subjects will be randomized by choosing a slip of paper from an envelope. This process will randomize 25 patients to the experimental group, and 25 patients to the control. The experimental group will undergo a blood draw, allowing for an injection of platelet rich plasma into the origin of the plantar fascia. The control group will undergo a corticosteroid injection into the plantar fascia as the sole treatment. Patients will be followed for three months for pain, and will fill out questionnaires at the initial visit prior to receiving the injection, as well as six and twelve weeks post injection.

These questionnaires will give insight into functionality and pain changes that the plantar fascia is experiencing due to treatment.

Subjects will be outpatients. Subjects may include employees, students, minorities, and elderly, although no subsets of these will be formed.

Subjects will be between 18 and 89 years of age.

In total, subject participation will last approximately 3 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Bernadino, California, United States, 92408
        • Loma Linda University Orthopaedic Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting with complaints of plantar heel pain, worse with rising in morning and/or after periods of sitting or lying presenting for at least 4 weeks
  • Examination reveals maximal tenderness at the attachment of the plantar fascia on the medial tubercle of the calcaneus
  • Willingness to participate in an investigational technique
  • Willingness to forgo any other concomitant conservative treatment modality; NSAIDS and orthotic devices during the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgery for heel pain
  • Nerve related symptoms (radiculopathy, tarsal tunnel syndrome, tarsi sinus syndrome)
  • Patient with complex regional pain syndrome
  • Achilles tendon pathology
  • RA, DM, local or systemic infection, PVD, metabolic disease such as gout, clotting disorder, anticoagulation therapy
  • Patients that are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Patients with metastatic cancer
  • Dysfunction of the knee, ankle, or foot
  • Work related or compensable injury
  • Previous treatment: corticosteroid injection in the last 6 months or NSAIDs treatment within the last 7 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: control
corticosteroid injection into the origin of the plantar fascia

Under sterile conditions, patients will receive a 4 cc injection consisting of 2 cc Celestone Soluspan (6mg/ml) and 2 cc of 1% lidocaine into the origin of the plantar fascia, administered by an orthopedic surgeon.

This will be done using a plantar approach. A peppering technique spreading in clockwise manner will be used to achieve a more expansive zone of delivery, with a maximum of 10 passes through the fascia itself.

The patient will be monitored for 10 minutes in clinic for adverse reactions.

Other Names:
  • xylocaine
  • betamethasone injectable suspension
Active Comparator: experimental
platelet rich plasma injection into the origin of the plantar fascia

30 ml of a patient's own blood will be collected via blood draw, maintaining sterile technique. This will then be spun down using a Magellan Autologous Platelet Separator System, yielding platelet rich plasma (PRP).

Under sterile conditions, patients will receive a 3 cc PRP injection (consisting of their own PRP) with 1 cc of 2% lidocaine into the origin of the plantar fascia, administered by an orthopedic surgeon.

This will be done using a plantar approach. A peppering technique spreading in clockwise manner will be used to achieve a more expansive zone of delivery, with a maximum of 10 passes through the fascia itself.

The patient will be monitored for 10 minutes in clinic for adverse reactions.

Other Names:
  • xylocaine
  • platelet rich plasma - PRP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain and Disability of the Foot and Ankle Through Validated Questionnaires
Time Frame: 15 minutes prior to initial injection of corticosteroid versus platelet rich plasma
Patients will be asked to fill out 3 questionnaires to provide insight into how their condition is progressing. These questionnaires consist of a visual analog pain score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating system, and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index. All these questionnaires are externally validated clinical outcome measures that rate foot and ankle pain and dysfunction on various numerical scales. With the exception of the visual analogue scale pain score, there is a direct relationship to the score and positive patient outcome.
15 minutes prior to initial injection of corticosteroid versus platelet rich plasma
Pain and Disability of the Foot and Ankle through Validated Questionnaires
Time Frame: 6 weeks from initial injection of corticosteroid versus platelet rich plasma
Patients will be asked to fill out 3 questionnaires to provide insight into how their condition is progressing. These questionnaires consist of a visual analog pain score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating system, and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index. All these questionnaires are externally validated clinical outcome measures that rate foot and ankle pain and dysfunction on various numerical scales. With the exception of the visual analogue scale pain score, there is a direct relationship to the score and positive patient outcome.
6 weeks from initial injection of corticosteroid versus platelet rich plasma
Pain and Disability of the Foot and Ankle through Validated Questionnaires
Time Frame: 12 weeks from initial injection of corticosteroid versus platelet rich plasma
Patients will be asked to fill out 3 questionnaires to provide insight into how their condition is progressing. These questionnaires consist of a visual analog pain score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating system, and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index. All these questionnaires are externally validated clinical outcome measures that rate foot and ankle pain and dysfunction on various numerical scales. With the exception of the visual analogue scale pain score, there is a direct relationship to the score and positive patient outcome.
12 weeks from initial injection of corticosteroid versus platelet rich plasma

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William P Bunnell, MD, Loma Linda University Department of Orthopaedics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plantar Fasciitis

Clinical Trials on corticosteroid injection

3
Subscribe