- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01134328
Efficacy of AC-150 for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis in the Enviro-CAC™ Model
September 13, 2017 updated by: Aciex Therapeutics, Inc.
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked Evaluation of the Efficacy of Cetirizine 0.1%/Fluticasone 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Its Components and Vehicle in a Modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Model During Pollen Season
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of AC-150 compared to vehicle and its components in the prevention of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis in Enviro-CAC™ Model.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
83
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01810
- ORA, Inc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
10 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Positive bilateral conjunctival allergen challenge(CAC) reaction
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known contraindications or sensitivities to the study medication or its components.
- Any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subjects safety or trial parameters.
- Use of disallowed medications during the period indicated prior to study enrollment or during the study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: AC-150 Combo
|
1 drop in each eye for up to 14 days
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: AC-150A 0.1%
|
1 drop in each eye once per day for up to 14 days
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: AC-150B 0.005%
|
1 drop in each eye once per day for up to 14 days
|
|
OTHER: Vehicle
|
1 drop in each eye once per day for up to 14 days
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ocular Itching at Onset of Action (15 Minutes Post-dose)
Time Frame: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation.
Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Ocular Itching at Duration of Action (16 Hours Post-dose)
Time Frame: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation.
Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Ocular Itching at 8 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4A
Time Frame: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 8 hours after drop instillation.
Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Conjunctival Redness at Onset of Action (15 Minutes Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation.
Conjunctival Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Conjunctival Redness at Duration of Action (16 Hours Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation.
Conjunctival Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Conjunctival Redness at 8 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4A
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 8 hours after drop instillation.
Conjunctival Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ciliary Redness at Onset of Action (15 Minutes Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation.
Ciliary Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of ciliary redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Ciliary Redness at Duration of Action (16 Hours Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation.
Ciliary Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of ciliary redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Ciliary Redness at 8 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4A
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 8 hours after drop instillation.
Ciliary Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of ciliary redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Episcleral Redness at Onset of Action (15 Minutes Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation.
Episcleral Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of episcleral redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Episcleral Redness at Duration of Action (16 Hours Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation.
Episcleral Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of Episcleral redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Episcleral Redness at 8 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4A
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 8 hours after drop instillation.
Episcleral Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Average of episcleral redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Total Redness at Onset of Action (15 Minutes Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation.
Total redness was defined as the sum of the conjunctival, ciliary and episcleral redness scores, and was, thus, on a 0-12 scale, making the threshold for clinical significance a treatment difference of 3.0 units.
Higher scores represent greater severity.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Total Redness at Duration of Action (16 Hours Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation.
Total redness was defined as the sum of the conjunctival, ciliary and episcleral redness scores, and was, thus, on a 0-12 scale, making the threshold for clinical significance a treatment difference of 3.0 units.
Higher scores represent greater severity.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Total Redness at 8 Hours Post-Dose at Visit 4A
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 8 hours after drop instillation.
Total redness was defined as the sum of the conjunctival, ciliary and episcleral redness scores, and was, thus, on a 0-12 scale, making the threshold for clinical significance a treatment difference of 3.0 units.
Higher scores represent greater severity.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Lid Swelling at Onset of Action (15 Minutes Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation.
Lid swelling was assessed by the patient on a 0-3 scale (0=none to 3=severe).
Average of lid swelling score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Lid Swelling Duration of Action (16 Hours Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation.
Lid swelling was assessed by the patient on a 0-3 scale (0=none to 3=severe).
Average of lid swelling score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Lid Swelling at 8 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4A
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 8 hours after drop instillation.
Lid swelling was assessed by the patient on a 0-3 scale (0=none to 3=severe).
Average of lid swelling score over both eyes was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Ear or Palate Pruritus at Onset of Action (15 Minutes Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation.
Ear or Palate Pruritus was assessed by the patient on a single 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Ear or Palate Pruritus score for each time point was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Ear or Palate Pruritus at Duration of Action (16 Hours Post-dose)
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation.
Ear or Palate Pruritus was assessed by the patient on a single 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Ear or Palate Pruritus score for each time point was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Ear or Palate Pruritus at 8 Hours Post-dose at Visit 4A
Time Frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation.
Ear or Palate Pruritus was assessed by the patient on a single 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe).
Ear or Palate Pruritus score for each time point was analyzed.
|
7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
|
|
Tolerability of Study Medication at Visit 2B
Time Frame: upon instillation, 1 minute and 2 minutes post instillation
|
Subjects were asked to rate the comfort of the drop in each eye upon instillation, at 1 minute, and at 2 minutes after instillation of study medication.
The assessment used a 10-point scale with 0 as very comfortable and 10 as very uncomfortable.
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
|
upon instillation, 1 minute and 2 minutes post instillation
|
|
Tolerability of Study Medication at Visit 3
Time Frame: upon instillation, 1 minute and 2 minutes post instillation
|
Subjects were asked to rate the comfort of the drop in each eye upon instillation, at 1 minute, and at 2 minutes after instillation of study medication.
The assessment used a 10-point scale with 0 as very comfortable and 10 as very uncomfortable.
Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
|
upon instillation, 1 minute and 2 minutes post instillation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nicholas P Marsico, MD, East West Eye Institute
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
July 1, 2010
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
July 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 1, 2010
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
June 2, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
September 14, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 13, 2017
Last Verified
September 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 10-100-0005
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Allergic Conjunctivitis
-
Laboratoires TheaCompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisFrance
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisSingapore
-
Zhaoke (Guangzhou) Ophthalmology Pharmaceutical...CompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisChina
-
NovartisAlcon ResearchCompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisChina
-
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.ORA, Inc.CompletedChronic Allergic Conjunctivitis
-
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.ORA, Inc.CompletedChronic Allergic Conjunctivitis
-
ORA, Inc.CompletedChronic Allergic ConjunctivitisUnited States
-
Aciex Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedAtopic Disease (Including Allergic Conjunctivitis)United States
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedSeasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisUnited States
-
Eleven BiotherapeuticsCompletedAllergic Conjunctivitis (AC)United States
Clinical Trials on AC-150 Combo
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompleted
-
University of Texas at AustinRecruiting
-
Gateway Health AllianceCompletedObesity | Overweight | Dyslipidemia
-
University of VirginiaNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionUnited States
-
CerecinCompletedAlzheimer DiseaseAustralia
-
CerecinWithdrawn
-
Zhejiang UniversityCompletedBronchiectasis | Pulmonary Nodule | Pulmonary Infection | Endotracheal TumourChina
-
Prof. Stephen LeeCompletedCoronary Thrombosis | Coronary RestenosisHong Kong
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Penn State UniversityCompletedDementia | Hospitalization | Acute Medical EventUnited States