Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE) (ED-SAFE)

March 12, 2019 updated by: Edwin Boudreaux, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

The NIMH s RFA-Suicide Prevention in Emergency Medicine Departments recognizes the emergency department (ED) as an important setting to increase suicide detection and prevention efforts but observes that evidence-based practice guidelines do not exist. In response, we have designed the Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE) trial. The ED-SAFE study will be conducted using a quasi-experimental design appropriate for studying systems-based change. The study consists of two components (Screening Outcome & Intervention Evaluation) and three phases of data collection: Treatment as Usual, Screening Alone, and Intervention. During each phase, 480 suicidal patients (1,440 total) will be enrolled and followed using multiple methods for 12 months.

The Screening Outcome Component

The Screening Outcome component will use data collected during the Treatment as Usual and Screening Alone phases. Consistent with systems-change principles, when universal screening is incorporated during the Screening Alone phase, it will be completed by the primary nurse as part of routine care. Primarily, it will focus on testing a practical approach to screen ED patients for suicidal ideation and behavior and will assess its impact on suicide detection, process outcomes, and suicide behaviors.

Intervention Evaluation Component

The Intervention Evaluation component will use data from the Treatment as Usual, Screening Alone, and Intervention Phases. During the Intervention phase, each ED will implement a multi-component, systems-based Intervention called the Safety Assessment and Follow-up Telephone Intervention (SAFTI). The SAFTI will combine elements of: (a) safety planning administered by nursing staff in the ED, and (b) Coping Long Term with Active Suicide Program (CLASP)-ED, a series of up to 7 semi-structured telephone advising calls to the patient and 4 to the significant other over the 12 months after the ED visit. Safety planning will be implemented universally to all suicidal patients, regardless of whether they are ultimately enrolled into the trial, as part of a comprehensive suicide management protocol (e.g., it is a systems-based change). However, for practical and budgetary considerations, the CLASP-ED telephone advising calls will be administered only to participants enrolled into the study.

Our overarching hypotheses will be tested using a combination of the Screening Outcome component and the Intervention Evaluation Component. We predict that screening will improve detection of suicidal ideation, and the intervention will enhance the quality of care and reduce suicide outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

see summary above

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1440

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85008
        • Maricopa Medical Center
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • University of Arkansas Medical Center
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • UMass Medical School, Marlborough Hospital
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68195
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University Medical Center
    • Rhode Island
      • Pawtucket, Rhode Island, United States, 02860
        • Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18,
  • Entering care at a hospital ED,
  • Documented thoughts or behaviors related to self-harm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No phone or permanent address,
  • Does not speak English or Spanish.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual
No Intervention: Screening Alone
Enhanced screening among ED patients
Experimental: Safety Assessment and Follow-up Telephone Intervention
SAFTI: Safety Assessment in the ED combine with a Follow-up Telephone Intervention.
Mental health evaluation in ED, followed by Post-ED counseling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of ER patients screened for self harm
Time Frame: July 2010 - November 2013
July 2010 - November 2013
Quality of care
Time Frame: July 2010 - November 2014
  • Process outcomes (e.g. receipt of safety plan)
  • Involvement in behavioral health treatment
July 2010 - November 2014
Suicide-related outcomes
Time Frame: July 2010 - November 2014
  • Preparatory acts
  • Suicide attempts
  • Completed suicides
July 2010 - November 2014

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Camargo, MD, DrPH, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Ivan Miller III, PhD, Butler Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 13420 (Other Identifier: Company internal)
  • 1U01MH088278-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicide

Clinical Trials on Safety Assessment and Follow-up Telephone Intervention (SAFTI).

Subscribe