Nasacort AQ Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis Study in Children With Allergic Rhinitis

June 21, 2012 updated by: Sanofi

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study Evaluating the Pharmacodynamic Effect of a 6-week Treatment With Triamcinolone Acetonide Aqueous Nasal Spray 110 μg and 220 μg Once Daily on Basal Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis Function in Children [>=2 to < 12 Years of Age] With Allergic Rhinitis (AR).

The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of a 6-week treatment with TAA-AQ (110 μg) and TAA-AQ (220 μg) once daily (QD) versus placebo on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function as measured by serum cortisol AUC(0-24 hr) in children (>=2 to <12 years old) with allergic rhinitis (AR).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study consisted of a run-in single-blind screening phase (prerandomization) followed by an approximately 6-week double-blind treatment phase (postrandomization).

Total study duration per participant lasted from 7.5 to 13 weeks and consisted of:

  • Screening and single-blind phases (these 2 phases ran concurrently, prerandomization) for 8 to 24 days. During the screening phase participants were given a single-blind placebo nasal spray to enable them to practice their intranasal application technique once daily in the morning (1 actuation/nostril).
  • Randomization to the double-blind treatment phase. Treatment assignment was randomized with stratification by sex and age group (>=2 to <6, >=6 to <12 years old).
  • Double-blind treatment phase which lasted at least 42 days and ran up to 47 days. Participants were administered either TAA-AQ nasal spray or placebo nasal spray.
  • An evaluation at the end of treatment 1-3 days after completion of the double-blind phase.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Cypress, California, United States, 90630
        • Investigational Site Number 840003
    • Georgia
      • Stockbridge, Georgia, United States, 30281
        • Investigational Site Number 840006
    • Massachusetts
      • North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States, 02747
        • Investigational Site Number 840007
    • Minnesota
      • Plymouth, Minnesota, United States, 55441
        • Investigational Site Number 840010
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68144
        • Investigational Site Number 840001
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • Investigational Site Number 840008
    • South Carolina
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 29307
        • Investigational Site Number 840002
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Investigational Site Number 840005

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Participants who met the following criteria were eligible for this study:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of AR documented by the investigator, as follows:

    • At least a 1-year clinical history (6-month history if the participant was >= 2 to < 4 years of age) of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR); or a clinical history of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) over 2 seasons and
    • positive skin test (prick or intradermal) to a seasonal or perennial allergen that was present in the participant's environment at time of screening.
  • Written informed consent and ability of parent/legal guardian of the participant to give a written informed consent before any study related procedures. Participants >=7 years of age (or younger according to the governing institutional review board [IRB]) had to provide a signed assent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant medical condition that might have interfered with the administration of a nasal spray, including anatomical abnormalities of the nose, face (eg, polyposis, markedly deviated septum)
  • Presence of any active, untreated, or clinically significant musculoskeletal, endocrinologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, respiratory, cardiovascular, or neurological condition that might have interfered with the study
  • Any conditions or treatment that might have affected the HPA axis or the plasma cortisol assay, including but not limited to:

    • Documented disorder involving the hypothalamus, pituitary, or adrenal gland
    • Current use of serotonergic, dopaminergic, adrenergic, cholinergic agonists and antagonists, opiates, immunomodulatory, hormonal drugs, and lipid-lowering agents
    • Treatment with systemic corticosteroids (oral, intravenous, intramuscular, or intra-articular) within 3 months prior to Visit 1
    • Treatment with systemic corticosteroids for > 2 courses received up to 1 year before Visit 1 was exclusionary. Up to 2 courses of systemic corticosteroids, each course not exceeding 14 days, up to 1 year before Visit 1 was allowed
    • Treatment with inhaled, intranasal, or high-potency topical corticosteroids within 6 weeks of Visit 1
    • History of hospitalization due to asthma within 1 year before screening. Participants with mild asthma that was well-controlled without the use of inhaled corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to Visit 1 were eligible for the study
  • Any clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) abnormal laboratory test at Visit 1
  • Morning serum cortisol outside the reference range at Visit 1
  • Any of the following missing serum cortisol samples from the Visit-2 collection: first sample (before administration of investigational product), 20-hour sample, 24-hour sample, or any 2 consecutive samples
  • Any medical condition where use of corticosteroids might have been contraindicated or could have led to disease exacerbation (eg, glaucoma, cataract, ocular herpes simplex, tuberculosis, growth retardation)
  • History of hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or to the rescue medication, investigational product, or to any of their excipients
  • Unresolved upper respiratory tract infection, sinus infection, or nasal candidiasis (ie, symptomatic or under treatment) within the last 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 and Visit 3
  • Females of childbearing potential not protected by effective contraceptive method of birth control or were unwilling to abstain from sexual activity and/or, were unwilling or unable to test for pregnancy. Only female adolescent with onset of menses were to be checked by serum pregnancy test at Visit 1
  • Pregnant female adolescent (who tested positive for pregnancy at Visit 1) The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
  • placebo during the screening phase and
  • placebo during the treatment phase.

All children had the option to take rescue medication, (Claritin®) as needed to relieve symptoms of AR.

1 spray/nostril, once daily in the morning, for 8 to 24 days during the screening phase.

Treatment assignment was randomized with stratification by sex and age group (>=2 to <6, >=6 to <12 years old).

  • For children who were >=2 to <6 years old, 1 spray/nostril, once daily in the morning, for 6 weeks, during the double-blind treatment phase.
  • For children who were >= 6 yrs to <12 years old, either 1 spray/nostril or 2 sprays/nostril, once daily in the morning, for 6 weeks, during the double-blind treatment phase.
Children's Claritin® Syrup [5 mg of loratadine per 5 mL] could be taken orally for the relief of AR symptoms throughout the study on an as needed basis, according to the Food and Drug Administration-approved manufacturer's label.
Experimental: TAA-AQ
  • placebo during the screening phase and
  • TAA-AQ (Nasacort AQ) during the treatment phase.

All children had the option to take rescue medication, (Claritin®) as needed to relieve symptoms of AR.

1 spray/nostril, once daily in the morning, for 8 to 24 days during the screening phase.

Treatment assignment was randomized with stratification by sex and age group (>=2 to <6, >=6 to <12 years old).

  • For children who were >=2 to <6 years old, 1 spray/nostril, once daily in the morning, for 6 weeks, during the double-blind treatment phase.
  • For children who were >= 6 yrs to <12 years old, either 1 spray/nostril or 2 sprays/nostril, once daily in the morning, for 6 weeks, during the double-blind treatment phase.
Children's Claritin® Syrup [5 mg of loratadine per 5 mL] could be taken orally for the relief of AR symptoms throughout the study on an as needed basis, according to the Food and Drug Administration-approved manufacturer's label.

Treatment assignment was randomized with stratification by sex and age group (>=2 to <6, >=6 to <12 years old).

  • For children who were >=2 to <6 years old, 1 spray/nostril (110 µg TAA-AQ), once daily in the morning, for 6 weeks, during the double-blind treatment phase.
  • For children who were >=6 yrs to <12 years old, either 1 spray/nostril (110 µg TAA-AQ) or 2 sprays/nostril (220 µg TAA-AQ), once daily in the morning, for 6 weeks, during the double-blind treatment phase.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ratio of Serum Cortisol Area Under Curve [AUC(0-24 hr)] at the End of Treatment to Baseline
Time Frame: 1-3 days prerandomization and 6 weeks postrandomization

Blood samples were collected over a 24-hour period (at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, and 24 hours), with 0 hour being between 8:00AM to 9:00AM, immediately prior to investigational product (IP) administration. AUC (0-24hr) was calculated using the trapezoid rule, and was normalized by dividing the AUC(0-24 hr) by the actual sample collection interval between 0-hour and 24-hour blood draw times.

Ratio in Serum Cortisol AUC(0-24 hr) = (Serum Cortisol AUC[0-24 hr] at 6 weeks postrandomization)/(Serum Cortisol AUC[0-24 hr] at 1-3 days prerandomization). Log transformation was used for the analysis.

1-3 days prerandomization and 6 weeks postrandomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
Time Frame: From 8-24 days prerandomization up to 6 weeks postrandomization

Every morning, participants rated the severity of symptoms experienced over the previous 24 hours using scale from 0-3, where 0=symptoms absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe symptoms (interfere with daily living or sleep) for each symptom (nasal congestion, nasal itching, sneezing, and runny nose). The rTNSS was the sum of the individual symptom scores, ranged from 0-12 (where 12 reflected the worst symptoms).

Change from baseline in the rTNSS = mean rTNSS (double-blind treatment phase) - mean rTNSS (screening phase).

From 8-24 days prerandomization up to 6 weeks postrandomization
Number of Participants by Relief Level as Evaluated by the Physician
Time Frame: At end of study (43-50 days after randomization)
Efficacy of treatment was assessed by the physician using a scale from 0-4 for relief levels, where 0 = no relief (symptoms unchanged or worsened than before), 1 = slight relief (symptoms present and only minimally improved), 2 = moderate relief (symptoms are present and may be troublesome, but are noticeably improved), 3 = marked relief (symptoms are greatly improved and although present are scarcely troublesome) and 4 = complete relief (virtually no symptom present).
At end of study (43-50 days after randomization)
Number of Participants by Relief Level as Evaluated by the Participant
Time Frame: At end of study (43-50 days after randomization)
Efficacy of treatment was assessed by the participant using a scale from 0-4 for relief levels, where 0 = no relief (symptoms unchanged or worsened than before), 1 = slight relief (symptoms present and only minimally improved), 2 = moderate relief (symptoms are present and may be troublesome, but are noticeably improved), 3 = marked relief (symptoms are greatly improved and although present are scarcely troublesome) and 4 = complete relief (virtually no symptom present).
At end of study (43-50 days after randomization)
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medication
Time Frame: From 8 to 24 days prerandomization and randomization to end of study (43-50 days postrandomization)
The number of participants using the rescue medication (Claritin®) during the single-blind screening phase (the time from 8-24 days before randomization up to the day before randomization) and during the double-blind treatment phase (the time from randomization to end of study).
From 8 to 24 days prerandomization and randomization to end of study (43-50 days postrandomization)
The Percent of Days of Rescue Medication Use During the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Time Frame: From randomization to 43-50 days postrandomization
The percent of days of rescue medication used during the double-blind treatment phase was calculated. For participants who did not use any rescue medication, the percentage of days using rescue medication was set to be 0.
From randomization to 43-50 days postrandomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Affairs, Sanofi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and/or Seasonal

Clinical Trials on Placebo nasal spray

Subscribe