Prophecy Guide Outcomes in Total Knee Replacement Surgery

July 27, 2010 updated by: Global Orthopaedic Technology

Phase IV Study - Prophecy Guide Outcomes in Total Knee Replacement Surgery

This project aims to assess two different techniques used to position the knee replacement implant during surgery. The patients will be randomised to receive either the following:

  1. The established Navigation System (gold standard)
  2. The new Prophecy Technique (validated by the Navigation System)

The study hypothesis is there will be no difference between the gold standard Navigation system and the Prophecy technique in relation to the placement of the knee implant.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Knee joint pain is often the cause of reduced joint and limb function. Total knee joint replacement is a procedure which aims to relieve pain and help to improve mobility. There has been continued development and improvement in knee implant design and the instruments required during surgery to assist with the accurate placement of the implant. These developments have reduced surgery time and assisted in the accurate positioning of the knee implant, which leads to better long term outcomes.

Navigation system is a computerised system currently used intraoperatively to position the Advance knee implant. The Prophecy technique is a pre-operative alignment technique. Patient undergo a MRI or CT scan which is used to manufacture personalised cutting blocks which are then used intraoperatively to position the knee implant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

188

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Queensland
      • Chermside, Queensland, Australia, 4032
        • Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital
      • Chermside, Queensland, Australia, 4032
        • Prince Charles Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 85 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients requiring a total Knee Arthroplasty as determined jointly by the surgeon and the patient.
  2. Over 65 years of age at time of surgery.
  3. Patients with the Varus or Valgus Osteoarthritis
  4. Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing to participate for the length of the prescribed term of follow-up.
  5. Patients who are capable of, and have given, informed consent to their participation in the study.
  6. The individual does not have an active infection within the affected joint.
  7. The individual has not had a previous total knee replacement or knee fusion of the affected knee joint.
  8. The individual is skeletally mature.
  9. The individual is not pregnant.
  10. The individual is not a prisoner.
  11. The individual has no plans to relocate to another geographic area before the completion of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous surgery requiring implanting a device.
  2. Knee deformity is >30° anatomic varus (as measured on an AP radiograph taken with the patient standing)
  3. Knee deformity is >30° anatomic valgus (as measured on an AP radiograph taken with the patient standing) >20° knee flexion contracture (as measured by investigator examination)
  4. Those patients requiring bone grafting or any other procedure that would extend the operative time beyond that of just replacing the knee should be excluded.
  5. The individual is classified as morbidly obese (>40 BMI).
  6. The individual is physically or mentally compromised (i.e., currently being treated for a psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, presence of alcohol or substance abuse), and is unwilling or unable to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluation and rehabilitation.
  7. The individual has a neuromuscular or neuro-sensory deficiency which limits the ability to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the device.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Navigation alone
Navigation system alone vs Prophecy technique with Navigation system validation
Experimental: Prophecy and Navigation validation
Navigation computerised system is used intraoperatively to correct implant the Advance knee implant. Prophecy is a pre-alignment technique where a pre-op MRI or CT scan is used to manufacture personalised cutting blocks to assist the surgeon in correct implanting the Advance knee implant intraoperatively
Other Names:
  • Prophecy Preoperative alignment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prophecy Guide Outcomes in Total Knee Replacement Surgery
Time Frame: 5 years
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the Prophecy technique and compare its outcomes to the established navigation (Gold standard) technique
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prophecy Guide Outcomes in Total Knee Replacement Surgery
Time Frame: 5 years

The secondary objectives are to evaluate the:

  1. Post-Operative Knee Alignment
  2. Implant sizing
  3. Implant position
  4. Tourniquet time
  5. Anaesthesia time
  6. Duration of surgery
  7. Validation of Prophecy MRI protocol
  8. Validation of bone resection
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hugh English, Brisbane Orthopaedic Specialist Services

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 29, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2010

Last Verified

July 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro-Nav-10

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Clinical Trials on Navigation System

Subscribe