Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Study for Evaluating the EVAHEART®2 Left Ventricular Assist System (COMPETENCE)

March 24, 2026 updated by: Evaheart, Inc.

Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Study for Evaluating the EVAHEART®2 Left Ventricular Assist System: the COMPETENCE Trial

This is a prospective, multi-center, unblinded, randomized, controlled, and non-inferiority study comparing the EVA2 LVAS to the most recent magnetically levitated centrifugal LVAS (HM3 LVAS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adult (>18 years old), advanced heart failure NYHA Class III with dyspnea upon mild physical activity or Class IV patients who are refractory to advanced heart failure management and meet study Inclusion/Exclusion criteria will be enrolled.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the EVA2 by demonstrating non-inferiority to commercially approved LVADs when used for the treatment of refractory advanced heart failure.

Subjects will be followed for 6 months (short-term cohort) and 24 months (long-term cohort) after EVA2/HM3 LVAS implantation or until outcome events of transplantation, explantation, death or withdrawal, whichever occurs first. Whereas subjects experiencing the outcome events of "Severe RHF" and "Disabling stroke" will remain in study follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

399

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • UF Health Shands Hospital
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Tampa General Hospital
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
        • St. Vincent Hospital Indianapolis
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • University of Louisville
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • The Christ Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Baylor Scott and White, Dallas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Methodist Hospital - San Antonio
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia Medical Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin-Madison

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The following is a list of general inclusion criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 30%
  • NYHA Class III with dyspnea upon mild physical activity or Class IV heart failure
  • Inotrope dependent OR Cardiac Index (CI) < 2.2 L/min/m2, while not on inotropes
  • Patient is able to provide written informed consent
  • More detailed inclusion criteria information is noted in the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Etiology of heart failure due to or associated with uncorrected thyroid disease, obstructive cardiomyopathy, pericardial disease, amyloidosis, or restrictive cardiomyopathy
  2. Technical obstacles which pose an inordinately high surgical risk
  3. Existence of ongoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) other than IABP and Impella 5.0 or 5.5
  4. Ongoing Impella (5.0 or 5.5) presenting related clinical sign (i.e. hematuria) and elevated LDH equal or greater than 600 IU/L.
  5. Positive pregnancy test if of childbearing potential
  6. Presence of mechanical aortic cardiac valve that will not be either converted to a bioprosthesis
  7. History of any organ transplant
  8. Platelet count <100,000/mL
  9. Psychiatric disease/disorder, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or psychosocial issues
  10. History of confirmed, untreated abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) > 5 cm in diameter within 6 months of enrollment
  11. Presence of an active, uncontrolled infection
  12. Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies or any other peri/postoperative therapy that the investigator will require based upon the patient's health status
  13. Presence of remarkable pre-defined end-organ dysfunction.
  14. Patient has moderate to severe aortic insufficiency without plans for correction during pump implant
  15. Low albumin - removed from recent exclusion criteria
  16. Planned Bi-VAD support prior to enrollment
  17. Patient has known hypo- or hyper coagulable state such as disseminated intravascular coagulation and heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
  18. Participation in any other clinical investigation that is likely to confound study results or affect the study
  19. Any condition other than heart failure that could limit survival to less than 24 months
  20. Patients refusing blood transfusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Evaheart LVAS (EVA2)
The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the EVA2 by demonstrating non-inferiority to commercially approved LVADs when used for the treatment of refractory NYHA Class III with dyspnea upon mild physical activity or Class IV heart failure.
Three-hundred and ninety-nine (399) subjects will be enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 assignment to receive EVA2 or the comparator device, HeartMate 3.
Other Names:
  • EVA2
Active Comparator: HeartMate 3 (HM3)
The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the EVA2 by demonstrating non-inferiority to commercially approved LVADs when used for the treatment of refractory NYHA Class III with dyspnea upon mild physical activity or Class IV heart failure.
Three-hundred and ninety-nine (399) subjects will be enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 assignment to receive EVA2 or the comparator device, HeartMate 3.
Other Names:
  • HM3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short-Term Primary Endpoint
Time Frame: 6 months
Survival to cardiac transplant or device explant for recovery free from disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Score > 3) or pre-defined severe Right Heart Failure at 6 months after implantation of the originally implanted device
6 months
Long-Term Primary Endpoint
Time Frame: 24 months
Survival to cardiac transplant or device explant for recovery free from disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Score > 3) or pre-defined severe Right Heart Failure at 24 months after implantation of the originally implanted device
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in KCCQ and EuroQol
Time Frame: Baseline versus POD 30, 90, 180, 360 and every 180 days
Baseline versus POD 30, 90, 180, 360 and every 180 days
Change in 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: Baseline versus POD 30, 90, 180, 360 and every 180 days
Baseline versus POD 30, 90, 180, 360 and every 180 days
NYHA functional class
Time Frame: Baseline versus POD 30, 90, 180, 360, and every 180 days
Baseline versus POD 30, 90, 180, 360, and every 180 days
Frequency and incidence of all re-operations
Time Frame: Discharge after implant through transplant or explant for recovery.
Discharge after implant through transplant or explant for recovery.
Frequency and incidence of all rehospitalizations
Time Frame: Discharge after implant through transplant or explant for recovery.
Discharge after implant through transplant or explant for recovery.
Incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events and UADEs
Time Frame: Implant through transplant or explant for recovery (+60 days or discharge) or 180 days on device; then duration of device support, up to 360 days (approximate)

Peri-operative complications and any failure to successfully implant the device.

All adverse events occurring during the acute and chronic phase of the study (frequency, severity, duration, sequelae and relationship to device).

All adverse events occurring during the extension phase (frequency, severity, duration, sequelae and relationship to device).

Implant through transplant or explant for recovery (+60 days or discharge) or 180 days on device; then duration of device support, up to 360 days (approximate)
Incidence of all device failures and device malfunctions
Time Frame: Implant through transplant or explant for recovery (+60 days or discharge) or 180 days on device; then duration of device support, up to 360 days(approximate)
Implant through transplant or explant for recovery (+60 days or discharge) or 180 days on device; then duration of device support, up to 360 days(approximate)
Post-transplant or post-explant survival
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-transplant or post-explant
Up to 30 days post-transplant or post-explant

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Powered Secondary Endpoint: GI bleeding
Time Frame: 24 months

Documented mucosal (GI tract and/or nasopharynx) bleeding, requiring blood transfusion (backed red blood cells) or hemoglobin drop (>2 g/dL) without another identifiable source of bleeding AND meet one or more of the following:

  • Identified mucosal bleeding by endoscope
  • Appearance of overt melena, hematochezia, hematemesis, epistaxis
  • Occult bleeding as evidenced by hemoccult-positive stool (2 consecutive testing to avoid false positive)
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tadashi Motomura, MD, PhD, Evaheart, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

August 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 020-1601-001-P01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on EVAHEART Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS)

Subscribe