Study Of The Efficacy Of Neurolysis In Functional Recovery From Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

March 22, 2013 updated by: Alexandre F. Cristante, University of Sao Paulo

STUDY OF THE EFFICACY OF NEUROLYSIS IN FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY FROM CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In an initial phase, 100 patients with chronic low back pain will be included in this study. The patients will be recruited through magazines and newspapers to take part in a screening for treatment of low back pain. This screening will involve the evaluation of data such as history and physical examination to classify the patient in the group of nonspecific low back pain, excluding patients with neurological alterations and the so-called Red-Flags.

Procedures After the initial screening the patients will undergo diagnostic blocks of the medial branch of lumbar vertebrae L2, L3, L4 , L5 and of the first sacral vertebra (S1) with lidocaine and control with distilled water. The patients that present more than 50% of pain improvement, evaluated by the Likert scale after 30 minutes will form the study group, while the patients that do not present pain improvement with lidocaine or that present pain improvement with distilled water will be excluded.

The medial branch block consists of the insertion of a 90mm, 25-gauge needle through the skin with radioscopic control up to the medial branch topography. Infusion of 1ml of 2% lidocaine should be performed in each medial branch of the abovementioned vertebrae. Control is executed in the same manner yet with infusion of 1ml of distilled water.

Through the use of the diagnostic block we will have 40 patients selected for the second phase of the study. Once defined the study group should be evaluated before the procedure through the Oswestry, Roland Morris, SF-36 and VAS questionnaires.

In the second phase of the study the patients will be randomized. The random division into two groups will be performed through a computerized program of random numbers. The randomization result will be kept in matt sealed envelopes to guarantee secrecy of the allocation. The neurolysis procedure will be carried out in the first group, consisting of 20 patients, and the placebo or sham procedure with the second group, also with 20 patients.

The neurolysis procedure will be carried out under sterile conditions, with the patient lying prone and with the neurotome insertion sites anesthetized with 2ml of 1% lidocaine. The neurotome (Smith & Nephew - RF) will be used for the procedure. The neurotome is a radiofrequency apparatus mounted on a 10cm electrode type 22 needle with a 5mm exposure tip. The neurotome should be introduced percutaneously in a manner similar to that adopted in the medial branch block through radioscopic control. The temperature of the electrode after its placement in the correct position is then raised to 80 °C for 90 seconds. Two neurotomies should be performed for each facet, one proximally and the other distally, due to double innervation of each facet. In the patients of the placebo group the procedure will be the same only the temperature of the neurotome will not be raised. This will be performed in a blind manner, as before starting the procedure, the surgeon will show the assistant who turns the device on or not the envelope containing the patient's group (placebo or neurotomy), yet the surgeon will not be informed whether the device has been turned on or not, having to perform the procedure in the same manner in both groups.

The patients will then be reevaluated in the first month, 3 months after, 6 months after and 12 months after the procedure. The assessors will not be informed of the group to which the patient belongs, and the same scales performed in the preoperative period will be used here.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05403-010
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the U.S.P
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ivan Dias Rocha

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical diagnosis of lumbar pain in a patient with age between 20 and 60 years.
  • present clinical complaints of low back pain for 3 months or more.
  • present pain of moderate to severe intensity: visual analogue scale (VAS) > 4.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients that develop a profile compatible with specific low back pain during treatment.
  • patients that request their withdrawal from the study at any time.
  • patients that develop an allergy to the medication used.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Neurolysis
In this intervention the neurotome will be connected
In this procedure the neurotome will be connected
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Neurotome OFF
neurotome not raised
In this intervention the neurotome will be unconnected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated 1 week before surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
The Patients will be evaluated 1 week before surgery
Pain Evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Pain Evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated three months after surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
The Patients will be evaluated three months after surgery
Pain Evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated six months after surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
The Patients will be evaluated six months after surgery
Pain Evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disability evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
Medial Block Improvement
Time Frame: one day after the medial branch block

likert five-level scale is a scale for evaluation of improvement:

  • 0-30% improvement - no improvement
  • 30-50% improvement - moderate improvement
  • 50-80% improvement - good improvement
  • 80-100% improvement - no pain to evaluate the improvement after the medial branch block
one day after the medial branch block
Health Status
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
Disability evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Disability evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
Disability evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
Disability evaluation
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Health Status
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Health Status
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
Health Status
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
Health Status
Time Frame: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 27, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 26, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RIZT2010
  • iot 803 (OTHER: institutional research committee)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on neurolysis

Subscribe