Sulfation of Bile Acids as a Biomarker for Hepatobiliary Diseases

September 28, 2023 updated by: University of Nebraska

The investigators hypothesize that the extent of sulfation of toxic BAs and their urinary elimination can be used as a biomarker to predict the severity and prognosis of hepatobiliary diseases. The investigators rationale in this project is that the discovery of biomarkers specific to liver injury would provide the foundation for a specific and non-invasive tool to evaluate disease prognosis, determine patients with higher risk of developing end-stage liver diseases, and determine patients with higher risk of recurrence of hepatobiliary complications after liver transplant.

Patients on the liver transplant list are continuously monitored during their hospitalization and are scheduled for follow-up visits for 12 months after their release post-surgery. Disease progression will be evaluated by monitoring MELD scores, survival, incidence of liver transplant, and incidence of complications related to hepatobiliary conditions such as fluid retention, GI bleeding, encephalopathy, and biliary stricture complications.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

The investigators propose the following specific aims to test the investigators hypothesis:

Specific Aim #1: Establish a baseline of individual and total urinary BAs and BA-sulfates in healthy controls and patients with hepatobiliary diseases. A baseline reference of the average and distribution of the percentage of urinary BA-sulfates will be determined in healthy subjects and in patients with hepatobiliary diseases including chronic hepatitis C/B, alcoholic liver disease, hereditary, drug-induced, and autoimmune hepatobiliary diseases. The investigators working hypothesis is that patients' capability to sulfate total or specific BAs, as determined by the percentage of total or specific BAs excreted in the sulfate form, can predict the severity of hepatobiliary diseases, as determined by mayo model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and compensation status(compensated and decompensated). Patients with higher MELD score are considered to be at higher risk of developing severe hepatobiliary complications.

Specific Aim #2: Determine the relationship between BA sulfation and the progression of hepatobiliary diseases. This is an exploratory aim to collect preliminary data on the relationship between urinary BAs and the progression of hepatobiliary diseases in liver-transplant and non-liver-transplant patients, as monitored over a1-year period. The investigators working hypothesis is that patients' capabilities of sulfating BAs determine the progression of the disease.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

430

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
        • University of Nebraska Medial Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy Controls: Subjects with no apparemt hepatobiliary diseases Patient Populaton: Subjects visiting the hepatology clinic in UNMC as part of their treatment of hepatobiliry diseases

Description

Healthy Controls

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, age 19-65, no apparent signs of hepatobiliary diseases

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Levels higher than 50, 56, 78 U/L for ALT, AST, and GGT, respectively.

Patient Population

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, age 19-65, visiting the UNMC hepatology clinic for treatment from hepatobiliary diseases

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MELD score less than 6

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Healthy Controls
Male or female, age 19-65, no apparent signs of hepatobiliary diseases
Patients with hepatobiliary diseases
Male or female, age 19-65, visiting the UNMC hepatology clinic for treatment from hepatobiliary diseases

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urinary bile acid indexes
Time Frame: Healthy controls: 4 visits over 28 days. Patients: urine collction at every visit as decided in their course of treatment
Bile acids (BAs), the end products of cholesterol metabolism, are synthesized in liver and excreted into bile, which flows to the small intestine via the bile duct. Most of the BAs are reabsorbed from the intestine into the portal circulation and undergo enterohepatic recirculation with minimal levels detected in urine and blood under normal conditions.
Healthy controls: 4 visits over 28 days. Patients: urine collction at every visit as decided in their course of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mayo model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD)
Time Frame: Healthy controls: 1st visit only (1 week). Patients: every time a MELD score is required by hepatologists as partrt of their regular course of treatment (1 year)
MELD score= 3.8*loge (bilirubin [mg/dL]) + 11.2*loge (INR) + 9.6*loge (creatinine [mg/dL]).
Healthy controls: 1st visit only (1 week). Patients: every time a MELD score is required by hepatologists as partrt of their regular course of treatment (1 year)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yazen M Alnouti, PhD, University of Nebraska

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

September 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatobiliary Diseases

3
Subscribe