The Comparison of Diagnostic TESE and TESA in Non-obstructive Azoospermic

July 14, 2011 updated by: Royan Institute

The Comparison of Diagnostic Testicular Sperm Extraction(TESE) and Testicular Sperm Aspiration(TESA) in Non-obstructive Azoospermic Patients a Randomized Clinical Trial Study

Azoospermia , as the name suggests , refers to the condition in which there are no sperm in the semen. This diagnosis can come as a rude shock, because most men with a zero sperm count have normal libido; normal sexual function; and their semen looks completely normal too. The diagnosis can only be made by examining the semen under a microscope in the laboratory.Men with non-obstructive azoospermia have a normal passageway, but abnormal testicular function, and their testes do not produce sperm normally. Some of these men may have small testes on clinical examination. The testicular failure may be partial, which means that only a few areas of the testes produce sperm, but this sperm production is not enough for it to be ejaculated. Other men may have complete testicular failure, which means there is no sperm production at all in the entire testes. The only way to differentiate between complete and partial testicular failure is by doing multiple testicular micro-biopsies to sample different areas of the testes and send them for pathological examination. This technique is called TESA, or testicular sperm aspiration ( also known as TESE, or testicular sperm extraction) or mTESE ( micro-testicular sperm extraction).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was performed on 180 men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), referring to royan infertility center, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Testis selection (right and left) and techniques (TESE or TESA) were performed randomly in patients. For every patient based on random order, TESA or TESE was performed as the following procedures. The testis was aspirated at three separated sites (upper, middle and lower pole), using 20 ml syringe and 18-gauge needle or testicular biopsy (TESE) was taken from the same 3 sites.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non obstructive Azoospermia
  • No Previous biopsy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atrophic testis
  • FSH levels more than 4 times normal range

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: aspiration
90 patients with non-obstructive azoospermi undergo testicular sperm aspiration
testicular sperm aspiration
Other Names:
  • sperm aspiration
Experimental: extraction
90 patients with non-obstructive azoospermi undergo testicular sperm extraction
TESE (testicular sperm extraction), which is actually a surgical biopsy of the testis; or TESA (testicular sperm aspiration), which is performed by sticking a needle in the testis and aspirating fluid and tissue with negative pressure
Other Names:
  • Tecnique comparision
testicular sperm extraction
Other Names:
  • sperm extraction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sperm retrieval
Time Frame: 6 months
comparision the success of sperm retrieval with TESE and TESA
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side effects
Time Frame: 6 months
Evaluate the side effects of the procedures like bleeding, inflammation, infection
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: hamid gourabi, PhD, President of Royan Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Jalil Hosseini, MD, urology investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

September 28, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2011

Last Verified

August 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Royan-Emb-009

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility

Clinical Trials on testicular sperm aspiration

Subscribe