Comparison of Traditional and Echocardiography Guided Fluid Management During Cytoreductive Surgery With HIPEC

August 9, 2023 updated by: University of Nebraska

Comparison of Traditional (Central Venous Pressure (CVP) and Urine Output Guided) Versus Echocardiography Guided Fluid Management in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is performed in patients with peritoneal tumors. Classically, this procedure is prolonged in duration and involves significant fluid shifts. Patients receive a large amount of volume replacement during this procedure (between 10 and 20 liters). The traditional methods to monitor adequacy of volume replacement are measurement of urine output and central venous pressure. There are drawbacks of any method of intravascular volume status measurement which may lead to over or under replacement of fluids. If fluid replacement is underestimated, the patient may suffer from adverse effects such as hypotension and renal dysfunction. However, the excessive administration of fluids may lead to other adverse events, including cardiac dysrhythmias and heart failure. The hypothesis of this study is that patients in whom volume status is maintained by utilizing a transesophageal echocardiogram will have better maintenance of fluid status while avoiding intravascular volume overload.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a procedure in which peritoneal surface tumors are removed followed by infusion of a heated chemotherapeutic solution into the abdominal cavity. This procedure is typically 6-10 hours in duration and is accompanied by significant fluid shifts and hemodynamic changes. Patients frequently receive between 10 and 20 liters of fluid during the procedure. Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC also experience vasodilatation and a hyperdynamic cardiac state during the hyperthermic period. Classically, the need for volume replacement has been guided by following a patient's urine output (UOP) and the use of central venous pressure (CVP). However, several studies have shown that CVP is not a reliable measure of intravascular fluid status.

We hypothesize that patients undergoing echocardiography guided anesthesia management (EGAM) will receive significantly less fluid during the operative period when compared to more traditional fluid therapy guided by monitoring of urine output and central venous pressure. In addition to the primary endpoint of a decrease in fluid administration, we would predict a decrease in time to extubation, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, post operative oxygen requirements, post operative complications including tachyarrhythmias, heart failure and pulmonary edema, and length of time to recovery of bowel function.

Patients presenting for cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC will be randomized into one of two groups, the echocardiography guided fluid management group or the traditional CVP/UOP fluid guided group. For patients in the echocardiography arm, this monitor will be used to optimize preload, contractility, heart rate and cardiac output. Patients in the CVP/UOP arm will receive the current standard of fluid administration to maintain adequate urine output. All patients presenting for the procedure will be offered an opportunity for admission into the study. Exclusion criteria include any absolute contraindications to transesophageal echocardiography, including cervical spine instability, esophageal strictures, webs or rings, patient refusal, esophageal perforation, obstructive esophageal neoplasms (Savage 2004).

A follow-up evaluation will be completed during the remainder of the patient's hospitalization to evaluate the previously discussed endpoints. The goal is to determine the optimal fluid management strategy to decrease morbidity in the post-operative period in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
        • The Nebraska Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy who are 19 years of age and older will be eligible for inclusion in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Absolute contraindications to transesophageal echocardiography, including cervical spine instability, esophageal strictures, webs or rings, patient refusal, esophageal perforation, obstructive esophageal neoplasms.
  • Relative contraindications to transesophageal echocardiography esophageal diverticulum, large hiatal hernias, recent esophageal or gastric surgery, esophageal varices, history of dysphagia or odynophagia, cervical arthritis, history of radiation to the mediastinum, deformities of the oral pharynx and severe coagulopathy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Echocardiography
These patients will have echocardiography guided fluid management
Echocardiography will be utilized during the procedure to guide fluid management.
Other Names:
  • Phillips Echocardiography machines
Active Comparator: Traditional fluid management
Fluid management will be guided by monitoring of central venous pressure and urine output.
Echocardiography will be utilized during the procedure to guide fluid management.
Other Names:
  • Phillips Echocardiography machines

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fluid administration decrease
Time Frame: One day (intraoperative period)
The amount of fluid administered during the intraoperative period will be monitored and recorded. The outcome measure of interest is the difference between fluid given in the standard group vs the echo guided fluid management group.
One day (intraoperative period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to extubation
Time Frame: An average of up to two weeks
The amount of time for participants to be extubated
An average of up to two weeks
Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay
Time Frame: An average of up to two weeks
Duration of stay in intensive care and overall time in hospital
An average of up to two weeks
Post operative oxygen requirements
Time Frame: An average of up to two weeks
The need, level and duration of any required post-operative oxygen
An average of up to two weeks
Cardiac complications
Time Frame: An average of up to two weeks
Post operative cardiac complications including tachyarrhythmias, heart failure and pulmonary edema
An average of up to two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy L Duhachek-Stapelman, MD, University of Nebraska

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

October 21, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peritoneal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Echocardiogram

Subscribe