Multi-Center 2-Week Clinical Evaluation of Three Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses

June 18, 2018 updated by: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of three silicone hydrogel contact lenses over a 2 week period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

540

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Brea, California, United States, 92891
      • Campbell, California, United States, 95008
      • Cupertino, California, United States, 95014
      • Mission Viejo, California, United States, 92691
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80909
    • Connecticut
      • Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States, 06610
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
      • Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33625
      • Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32792
    • Georgia
      • Roswell, Georgia, United States, 30076
    • Illinois
      • Bloomington, Illinois, United States, 61701
    • Indiana
      • Mishawaka, Indiana, United States, 46545
    • Kansas
      • Pittsburg, Kansas, United States, 66763
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
    • Missouri
      • Independence, Missouri, United States, 64055
      • Raytown, Missouri, United States, 64133
    • New Jersey
      • Closter, New Jersey, United States, 07624
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10001
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27615
    • Ohio
      • North Olmsted, Ohio, United States, 44070
      • Powell, Ohio, United States, 43065
    • Pennsylvania
      • Kittanning, Pennsylvania, United States, 16201
    • Rhode Island
      • Warwick, Rhode Island, United States, 02888
    • South Dakota
      • Chamberlain, South Dakota, United States, 57325
    • Tennessee
      • Bartlett, Tennessee, United States, 38134
      • Brentwood, Tennessee, United States, 37027
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
    • Texas
      • Tyler, Texas, United States, 75701
      • Tyler, Texas, United States, 75703
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84106
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05401
    • Virginia
      • Salem, Virginia, United States, 24153
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23455

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be no less than 18 and no more than 39 years of age.
  • Sign Written Informed Consent and investigator to record this on Case Report Form.
  • Be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set out in the protocol.
  • Be an existing successful daily wear soft contact lens wearer. For the purposes of this study this means wearing lenses for at least 6 hours per day, 5 days per week for the last month.
  • No extended wear in the last 3 months.
  • Subjective refraction must result in a vertex corrected spherical contact lens prescription between -1.00 and -6.00 diopters.
  • Have refractive astigmatism less than or equal to 1.00 diopters (D) in both eyes.
  • Achieve visual acuity of 6/9 (20/30) or better in each eye.
  • Require a visual correction in both eyes (no monovision allowed).
  • Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having: no amblyopia, no evidence of lid abnormality or infection (including blepharitis/meibomitis), no conjunctival abnormality or infection, no clinically significant slit lamp findings (i.e. stromal edema, vascularization, infiltrates or abnormal opacities), no other active ocular disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requires concurrent ocular medication.
  • Clinically significant corneal stromal haze, corneal vascularization, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar hyperemia, limbal hyperemia, or any other abnormality of the cornea that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Clinically significant corneal staining
  • Requires presbyopic correction (i.e. Not using any presbyopic correction and measured add power of less than +1.00 diopters).
  • Has had refractive surgery.
  • Has had eye injury/surgery within 8 weeks immediately prior to enrollment for this study.
  • Abnormal lacrimal secretions.
  • Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting.
  • Keratoconus or other corneal irregularity.
  • Hard, hybrid or Rigid Gas Permeable lens wear in the previous 8 weeks.
  • Any systemic illness which would contraindicate lens wear or the medical treatment of which would affect vision or successful lens wear.
  • Diabetic.
  • Infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease [e.g., Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)].
  • History of chronic eye disease (e.g. glaucoma or Age Related Macular Degeneration).
  • Pregnancy, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrollment.
  • Participation in any concurrent clinical trial or in last 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: galyfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to receive the galyfilcon A lens with a base curve of 8.30 throughout the entire course of the study.
galyfilcon A, BC 8.30 soft contact lens
Other: lotrafilcon B
Subjects that were randomized to wear lotrafilcon B lens throughout the course of the study.
lotrafilcon B, BC 8.60 soft contact lens
Other: comfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to wear comfilcon A lens throughout the course of the study.
comfilcon A, BC 8.60 soft contact lens

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Subjective Comfort
Time Frame: after 2 weeks of contact lens wear
Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM questionnaire: A validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.
after 2 weeks of contact lens wear
Corneal Staining
Time Frame: after 2 weeks of contact lens wear
Investigator evaluated corneal staining. Percent of eyes with corneal staining presence or absence is evaluated.
after 2 weeks of contact lens wear

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Subjective Lens Handling
Time Frame: after 2 weeks of contact lens wear
Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM questionnaire: A validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0 to 120. Only galyficlon A and comfilcon A were evaluated.
after 2 weeks of contact lens wear

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CR-201007

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on galyfilcon A, BC 8.30

Subscribe