Catumaxomab as a Consolidation Therapy in Patients With Ovarian Cancer in Second or Third Clinical Disease Remission

August 9, 2016 updated by: Secretaría Técnica GEICO, Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario

A Phase II of Intraperitoneal Catumaxomab as a Consolidation Therapy in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma in Second or Third Complete Clinical Disease Remission

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of catumaxomab as consolidation treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in second or third complete remission.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal malignant gynecological tumor and the fourth most common cause of death by cancer among women. The highest incidence rates are observed in Eastern and Northern Europe, and in the United Status. In Spain, 3,262 new cases were diagnosed in 2002, and the figure is expected to rise to 3,722 cases in 2015 (Globocan 2002, International Agency for Research on Cancer -IARC).

The majority of patients with ovarian cancer are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and are treated with maximum cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal and/or intravenous chemotherapy. What is considered standard chemotherapy consists of a platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) combined with a taxane, usually paclitaxel (Ozols, 2003; Armstrong 2006). Although many patients respond to the initial treatment, the majority experience subsequent recurrence of the disease, which is why they need to be treated with successive salvage therapies in an attempt to control the disease until it is converted into totally refractory (Markman, 2004). Only 20-30% of patients can be cured with current treatments, which is why it is necessary to investigate and develop new treatments and/or treatment strategies (Yap, 2009).

Although with the initial treatment based on cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy the large majority of patients achieve complete remission of the disease, 90% of the patients with sub-optimum cytoreductive surgery and 70% with optimum cytoreductive surgery develop a recurrence in the first 24 months. One of the treatment strategies being investigated to try and improve the results is the administration of consolidation or maintenance treatment to those patients that have achieved a complete response of their disease to reduce the risk of subsequent recurrence (Sabbatini, 2006).

In the last few years, various studies have established that investigating a possible therapeutic effect of consolidation or maintenance treatment following second or third complete clinical remission, obtained with a salvage chemotherapy, produces several advantages over the same strategy applied on a first complete clinical response: the median of progression-free survival after second or third complete response is shorter and more predictable -10 months-, and moreover the recurrence is practically universal (Markman 2004; Harrison, 2007; Levine, 2007; Markman, 2008; Juretza, 2008).

Catumaxomab has proven to be effective in patients with refractory tumours and recurring malignant ascites, i.e. patients with a very advanced disease, a large tumour and no treatment options. These clinical conditions are the worst for researching into any immune-based therapy, hence it seems logical to study the efficacy of catumaxomab in more favourable conditions.

Patients with ovarian cancer in second or third complete remission may be a more suitable population for investigating the intraperitoneal administration of catumaxomab as consolidation treatment: 1. 100% of the epithelial ovarian cancers express EpCAM (Epithelial cell adhesion molecule )(Kim, 2003; Bellone, 2009). 2. These patients present a minimal residual disease that cannot be eliminated with standard chemotherapy and is responsible for a subsequent recurrence in practically every patient, with a median progression-free survival of 10 months (Markman, 2004; Harrison, 2007). 3. The peritoneal cavity is a very common location for residual disease and/or recurrence in ovarian cancer (Ferrandina, 2006). 4. The absence of macroscopic disease in the peritoneal cavity may bring about a greater absorption of catumaxomab on the blood level, with a hypothetical greater efficacy on the systemic level without entailing a greater risk of toxicity (Heiss, 2008; Lordick, 2008).

The intention in this phase II study is to estimate the clinical benefit of consolidation treatment with catumaxomab in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in second or third complete remission, by measuring progression-free survival, the percentage of progression-free patients at 12, 18 and 24 months, and comparing individually for each patient the duration of progression-free survival obtained following consolidation with catumaxomab with that observed in her first complete remission. If we observe a median of progression-free survival equal to or greater than 14 months, accompanied by a significant percentage of progression-free patients at 18 and 24 months, we will assess the possibility of subsequently designing a phase III study of consolidation with catumaxomab.

To improve the tolerability of catumaxomab, premedication will be administered with low-dose corticoids before each infusion of catumaxomab. The low doses of corticoids have been shown not to interfere with the efficacy of catumaxomab, but by reducing the release of certain cytokines like TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha) they may reduce the associated adverse effects (Waltz, 2005).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital de la Vall d'Hebron
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital Gregorio Marañon
      • Madrid, Spain, 28033
        • M.D. Anderson
      • Mallorca, Spain, 07014
        • Hospital Son Dureta
      • Murcia, Spain, 30008
        • Hospital Jose Maria Morales Meseguer
      • Santander, Spain, 39008
        • Hospital Universitario de Valdecilla
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 15706
        • Hosptial Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
      • Valencia, Spain, 46009
        • Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia
      • Valencia, Spain, 46009
        • Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia
      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • Hospital Miguel Servet
    • Barcelona
      • Girona, Barcelona, Spain, 17007
        • Institut Catala d'Oncologia de Girona
      • Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain, 08208
        • Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli
    • Madrdi
      • Madrid, Madrdi, Spain, 28041
        • Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre
    • Madrid
      • Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain, 28922
        • Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed Informed consent.
  • Initial histopathologic diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer, cancer of the fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma
  • Women ≥ 18 years
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Groupperformance)
  • Initial surgical cytoreduction as primary treatment combinated with Platinum- based chemotherapy administered as part of primary therapy.

Failure of the primary treatment as manifested by recurrent disease that have achieved a second or third complete response with a second or third-line chemotherapy (platinum-based or not).

The complete response to the second or third-line chemotherapy is defined as non symptoms of cancer persistence, normal CA-125 (cancer antigen 125), negative medical examination, and no evidence of disease in a TAC.

  • At least 4 cycles of second or third-line chemotherapy must have been administered
  • Surgery performed at first or second relapse in conjunction with second or third-line chemotherapy is permitted.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute or chronic infection
  • Concomitant treatment with cancer chemo- and/or radiotherapy
  • Exposure to an investigational product within 28 days of first infusion
  • Previous treatment with murine monoclonal antibodies
  • Inadequate renal function: creatinine >1.5 upper limit of normal [ULN] and/ or calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min
  • Inadequate hepatic function (AST, ALT, >2.5 xULN; bilirubin >1.5 xULN), Hypoalbuminaemia < 3 g/dL
  • Platelets <80000 cells/mm3; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1000 cells/mm3,
  • Hb < 8g/dL and PTT > 2 x ULN
  • Patients with occlusive intestinal or symptomatic sub-occlusive intestinal within the last 30 days.
  • Significant cardiovascular disease including unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months before initiating study treatment or a history of ventricular arrhythmia
  • Unable or unwilling to comply fully with the protocol.
  • Any co-morbid disease that would increase risk of toxicity according to investigator judgment
  • Any kind of disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or comply with the study procedures
  • Exposure to investigational product, cancer, chemo-or radiotherapy within the last 28 days (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) before first infusion
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to catumaxomab or similar antibodies
  • Long-lasting steroid treatment (≥ 7 days), Patients should only be included after stepwise discontinuation and free of steroids for a minimum of 5 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Catumaxomab
Catumaxomab: 4 intraperitoneal infusions of catumaxomab over 11 days administered in a period of 3 hours through an intraperitoneal catheter with the following dosage: 1) 10 µg on Day 0. 2) 20 µg on Day 3. 3) 50 µg on Day 7. 4) 200 µg on Day 10.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
Progression-free survival per protocol is defined as the period from the commencement of the consolidation treatment (catumaxomab Day 0) and the recurrence of the disease or the last follow-up for the patients not developing a recurrence.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Second progression-free survival (2PFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
In patients in second complete remission, measured from the beginning of the treatment for the first recurrence until the date of the second recurrence of the disease, or the date of the last follow-up when the patient does not develop a recurrence of the disease.
3 years
Third progression-free survival (3PFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
In patients in third complete remission, measured from the beginning of the treatment for the second recurrence until the date of the third recurrence of the disease, or the date of the last follow-up when the patient does not develop a recurrence of the disease.
3 years
Progression-free survival per protocol
Time Frame: 3 years
Measured from the date of the beginning of the study treatment (catumaxomab Day 0) until the recurrence of the disease, or the date of the last follow-up when the patient does not develop a recurrence of the disease.
3 years
First progression-free survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Which has to be recorded retrospectively, measured from the date of the initial treatment for the ovarian cancer (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or cytoreductive surgery) until the date of the first recurrence of the disease.
3 years
Duration of the treatment-free interval
Time Frame: 3 years
Measured from the date of the administration of the last dose of catumaxomab until the date of the beginning of the following salvage treatment.
3 years
Overall survival rate
Time Frame: 3 years
Measured from the date of the first administration of the study treatment (catumaxomab Day 0) until the death of the patient.
3 years
Incidence, intensity and causalidad of every adverse event.
Time Frame: 3 years
The incidence, intensity and possible causality of every adverse event (AE). AEs will be assessed according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 4.0.
3 years
Therapeutic compliance
Time Frame: 3 years
Compliance and percentage of patients being given the 4th dose of catumaxomab in accordance with the treatment plan, Day 10.
3 years
The level of cells involved in the immune response
Time Frame: 3 years
The level of cells involved in the immune response, including sub-populations of the T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, "natural killer" cells, and antigen-processing cells measured in a sample of ovarian cancer (optional study)
3 years
Interval between the administration of the last dose of chemotherapy and the beginning of the treatment with catumaxomab
Time Frame: 3 years
Interval between the administration of the last dose of chemotherapy and the beginning of the treatment with catumaxomab
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ana Oaknin, Dra., Hospital de la Vall d'Hebron
  • Study Chair: Antonio Gonzalez, Dr., M.D. Anderson
  • Principal Investigator: Miguel Beltran, Dr., Institut Calatà d'Oncologia de Girona
  • Principal Investigator: Yolanda García, Dra., Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli
  • Principal Investigator: Andrés Póveda, Dr., Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia
  • Principal Investigator: Ana Santaballa, Dra., Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia
  • Principal Investigator: Mª Elena García, Dra., Hospital Jose Maria Morales Meseguer
  • Principal Investigator: Andrés Redondo, Dr., Hospital Universitario La Paz
  • Principal Investigator: Ana Herrero, Dra., Hospital Miguel Servet
  • Principal Investigator: Juan Fernando Cuevas, Dr., Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
  • Principal Investigator: Arantxa Gonzalez, Dra., Hospital Son Dureta
  • Principal Investigator: Eva Guerra, Dra., Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
  • Principal Investigator: Jesus García, Dr., Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón
  • Principal Investigator: Jose Angel Arranz, Dr., Hospital Gregorio Marañon
  • Principal Investigator: Ana de Juan, Dra., Hospital Universitario de Valdecilla
  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Casado, Dr., Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
  • Principal Investigator: César Mendiola, Dr., Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trials on Catumaxomab

Subscribe