Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction With AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing Compared to Standard Surgical Dressing

Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction With AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing Compared to Standard Surgical Dressing. A Prospective, Randomized Study in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

The objective of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing (treatment group) as compared to prepackaged island wound dressings consisting of traditional tape and gauze (control group) for total hip and total knee arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • OrthoCarolina, PA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients presenting for primary total hip performed through a posterior or posterior-lateral surgical approach or primary total knee arthroplasty
  2. Patients between the ages of 18 and 90
  3. The subject is willing and able to understand, sign and date the study specific patient Informed Consent, to volunteer participation in the study
  4. The subject is having surgery at a Carolinas HealthCare System facility
  5. The subject is psychosocially, mentally and physically able to comply with the requirements of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients presenting for revision total hip or total knee arthroplasty
  2. Patients with topical hypersensitivity or allergy to any disposable components of the dressing system such as: ionic silver, polyurethane film
  3. Any systemic or local active dermatological disease that might interfere with the evaluation of the surgical site such as eczema, psoriasis, skin cancer, scleroderma, chronic urticaria
  4. Patients currently participating in another clinical trial that may affect your participation in this trial
  5. Patients with insurance coverage not included in Gentiva list of payers
  6. Patients residing outside of Gentiva's geographical coverage area
  7. Patients having surgery at a NON-Carolinas HealthCare System facility

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: (AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing
The AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing is a silver impregnated, waterproof, adhesive dressing that sticks to the skin around the wound and blocks bacteria from the outside.
A standard island dressing consists of adhesive tape and gauze.
Active Comparator: Standard island gauze and tape dressing
A standard island dressing consists of adhesive tape and gauze.
The AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing is a silver impregnated, waterproof, adhesive dressing that sticks to the skin around the wound and blocks bacteria from the outside.
A standard island dressing consists of adhesive tape and gauze.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of postoperative severe skin reactions (defined as blisters) around the surgical incision site
Time Frame: 4 weeks postop
Wound checks will be performed during the postoperative period in the hospital followed by home healthcare providers. The final wound check will be performed by the surgeon at 4 weeks postoperatively.
4 weeks postop

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient pain and satisfaction (1-100 visual analog scale)
Time Frame: immediate postop, 5-7 days postop, 4 weeks postop
immediate postop, 5-7 days postop, 4 weeks postop

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bryan D Springer, MD, OrthoCarolina, PA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10-10-01A

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Healing

Clinical Trials on Postop Dressing

Subscribe