Effectiveness of Incorporating Tai Chi in Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in Primary Health Care (COPD)

March 2, 2013 updated by: Lorna Ventura Ng, Kwong Wah Hospital

Effectiveness of Incorporating Tai Chi in Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for COPD Patients in Primary Health Care

The purpose of this study was to compare the self-efficacy and quality of life parameters of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD)patients who underwent pulmonary rehabilitation with and without Tai Chi elements incorporated in the exercise component in a General Out-patient setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects: 192 patients were enrolled and recruited from four General Out-patient clinics in Yau Tsim Mong and Wong Tai Sin districts.

Study Design: Prospective single blind randomized controlled trial

Subjects were randomized into Pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) group (n = 98) and Pulmonary rehabilitation program with Tai chi group (TC)(n=94). Details of PRP and PRP + Tai Chi will be discussed below.

Both groups will be given booklet on COPD information and management.

Randomization:

Computer generated pre-assigned randomization of subjects to group allocation is made after baseline assessment. At each stage, assessors for outcome measures and data collection are blinded to the patient's grouping. Patients, investigator and physiotherapist are open to the group allocation.

Standardized medical treatment:

All COPD patients are managed according to practical guidelines recommended by the Hospital Authority. Medical treatment is reviewed and changed if clinically appropriate. In response to an exacerbation, antibiotic is added if a respiratory infection is the cause and oral steroid may be prescribed if clinically indicated.

Measurement and Evaluation

Baseline assessment:

  1. Medical aspect: GOLD staging of COPD; Baseline spirometry test including bronchodilator reversibility test.
  2. Self-Efficacy: COPD Self Efficacy Scale (CSES); Self-Efficacy for Managing Shortness of Breath (SEMSOB)
  3. Quality of life related measures: St. George Respiratory Questionnaire ( SGRQ)
  4. Exercise Capacity: 6 Minutes Walking Distance Test (6MWT)

Reassessment done at 2 months and 6 months using:

  1. Primary Outcome measures and Secondary measures outcome mentioned in outcome measures
  2. Spirometry exclusive of bronchodilator reversibility test

Statistical methods

Descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, frequency and percentages were used to describe the demographic characteristics and summarize the baseline characteristics of the variables. Independent T-test was used to examine the difference in demographic characteristics and baseline outcome measures between the PRP and TC group. Paired T-test was performed to examine the differences of outcome measures, including spirometry, 6 MWT, SGRQ-HKC, CSES, SEMSOB before and after intervention program within group. Analysis of covariance(ANCOVA) were used to examine the differences of outcome variables between PRP and TC group adjusted for age, sex, body mass index BMI, smoking and education, with the corresponding baseline value as a covariate. A p-value of 0.05 ws used as the level of statistical significance. Confidence intervals ( 95%) of the mean differences between baseline and 6 months post intervention values were calculated to compare the effects with the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the SGRQ-HKC. All analyses were conducted using Statistical package for the Social Sciences SPSS version 16.0.

Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme (PRP) Details :

The revised PRP consisted of 12 sessions (twice per week for 6 weeks) with 6-10 subjects per session. The standard content consists of physical training including warm up & cool down exercise and aerobic exercises.

For the PRP group, patients performed 5 minutes warm up exercises. Then 2 aerobic activities including treadmill exercise and lower limb ergometry exercise lasting 20 minutes each,were prescribed. 15 minutes rest were given between each exercise. After the aerobic exercises, 5 minutes cool down exercises, followed by 15 minutes of relaxation exercise was conducted before patients completed that session. Each session lasted for about 1 hour and 20 minutes.They were instructed to continue unsupervised home exercises consisting of 5 minutes of warm-up, 5 minutes of Thera-Band strengthening exercises, 30 minutes of aerobic exercises, 5 minutes cool down and 15 minutes of relaxation exercise for at least one hour 5-7 days/week.

For the PRP + Tai Chi group, the exercise content is totally identical to the PRP group except 15 minutes of Tai Chi exercises was substituted to the 15 minutes of relaxation exercise. Each session also lasted for about 1 hour and 20 minutes. The 5 forms of Suen Style of Tai Chi are chosen because it will encourage larger limbs movement as well as chest wall movement incorporated with diaphragmatic breathing and breathing control.

Details of the 5 forms of Sun Style Tai Chi chosen are:

  1. commencing form
  2. single whip : left and right
  3. turn with slanted flying: left and right
  4. wave hands like clouds: left and right
  5. moving as if shutting a door

The exercise intensity level of the aerobic activities will be set at a target heart rate of 60-70 % of their maximum heart rate and rate of perceived dyspnea(RPD) level of not more than 7. Vital signs will be monitored before, during & after exercise to ensure that the exercise heart rate does not exceed the target level. Also, any time when patient feels discomfort with RPD level reaching 7, the exercise will be stopped and patient is allowed to rest.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

192

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong SAR, China
        • Kwong Wah Hospital General Out-patient Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. . Previous diagnosis of COPD
  2. . Absence of bronchiectasis, bronchiolitis obliterans, panbronchiolitis and asthma
  3. . Medical Research Council(MRC)Dyspnea score > 2 using the 1-5 scale version
  4. .Willing to participate and able to give consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. . Patients with poor mobility, i.e. wheelchair bound; or
  2. . Patients with severe comorbidities, including acute myocardial infarction in preceding 6 months; or
  3. . Patients with severe hearing impairment or cognitive impairment; or
  4. . Patient unwilling to participate and unable to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tai chi + PRP
Tai chi elements in incorporated into the exercise component of standard pulmonary rehabilitation program. The exercise content was totally identical to the PRP group except 15 minutes of Tai Chi exercises was substituted to 15 minutes of relaxation exercise. The 5 forms of Sun Style of Tai Chi were taught.
The exercise content was totally identical to PRP group except 15 minutes of 5 Sun Style Tai Chi were substituted to 15 minutes of relaxation exercise
Other Names:
  • Tai chi elements added to pulmonary rehabilitation program
Formal pulmonary rehabilitation program consisted of overview of COPD management, aerobic exercises, breathing control exercises, Thera-Band strengthening exercises, safety precautions for physical training and goal setting
Other Names:
  • Formal pulmonary rehabilitation program
Active Comparator: PRP
PRP is a formal pulmonary rehabilitation program consisted of physical training including warm up and cool down exercise and aerobic exercises in addition to breathing control exercises, safety precautions for physical training, Thera-Band strengthening exercises and overview of COPD management.
Formal pulmonary rehabilitation program consisted of overview of COPD management, aerobic exercises, breathing control exercises, Thera-Band strengthening exercises, safety precautions for physical training and goal setting
Other Names:
  • Formal pulmonary rehabilitation program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self Efficacy :COPD Self Efficacy Scale (CSES)
Time Frame: Change in CSES at 6 months post-intervention
34 item questionnaire consisting of likert scale with 5 responses ranging from "1" indicating " not at all confident" to "5" indicating " very confident" with higher scores representing higher self efficacy. In this study , we used the rating score in the analysis as some items were considered non-applicable in some cases. Rating score from 0.2 to 1 with 0.2 as "not at all confident and 1 as "very confident". The validated Chinese version of CSES was also used
Change in CSES at 6 months post-intervention
Self- Efficacy : Self-Efficacy for Managing Shortness of Breath ( SEMSOB)
Time Frame: Change in SEMSOB at 6 months post-intervention
The SEMSOB is a single question 1-10 scale, valid and reliable instrument that measures patients' overall confidence in keeping breathing difficulties from interfering with what they want to do with higher score indicating greater self efficacy.
Change in SEMSOB at 6 months post-intervention
SGRQ HKC-Symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
SGRQ HKC-Symptoms is calculated by dividing the summed weights by the adjusted maximum possible weight for that component and expressing the result as a percentage. SGRQ-Symptoms score ranged from 0 to 100, where zero indicates best health and 100 indicating maximum disability.
6 months post-intervention
SGRQ HKC-Activity
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
SGRQ HKC-Activity is calculated by dividing the summed weights by the adjusted maximum possible weight for that component and expressing the result as a percentage. SGRQ-Activity score from 0 to 100, where zero indicates best health and 100 indicating maximum disability.
6 months post-intervention
SGRQ HKC-Impact
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
SGRQ HKC -Impact is calculated by dividing the summed weights by the adjusted maximum possible weight for that component and expressing the result as a percentage. SGRQ-impact score from 0 to 100, where zero indicates best health and 100 indicating maximum disability.
6 months post-intervention
SGRQ HKC Total
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
SGRQ HKC-Total is calculated by summing all positive responses in the questionnaire and expressing the result as a percentage of the toal weight for the questionnaire. A total score is calculated from all three components. The SGRQ-total score ranged from 0 to 100, where zero indicates best health and 100 indicating maximum disability.
6 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 MWT in Meters
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
The 6 minute walking test ( 6MWT) was conducted according to protocol recommended by American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines to measure functional exercise capacity.This test measured the self paced distance in meters that a patient could quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.
6 months post-intervention
FVC
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention
Forced vital capacity, measured in liters, component of lung function parameters measured by spirometry
6 months post intervention
FEV1
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
Forced expiratory volume in one second, measured in liters, component of lung function test measured by spirometry
6 months post-intervention
FEV1% Pred
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
Pred FEV1 percent predicted normal values;measured using spirometry
6 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: lorna Ng, doctor, Kwong Wah Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 14, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Tai chi + PRP

Subscribe