Qishe Pill for Cervical Radiculopathy

November 11, 2014 updated by: Cui xuejun, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Effectiveness of a Compound Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicine, Qishe Pill, on Cervical Radiculopathy: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre Trial

Radiculopathy generally presents with pain, numbness, or weakness in a dermatomal distribution. Cervical radiculopathy results from impingement on a nerve root by either spondylotic narrowing of the neural foramen or a lateral intervertebral disc herniation. Specifically, it should be the goal of the treating physician to relieve pain, improve function, and prevent recurrence. Various studies have shown that nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy leaves a substantial minority of patients with persistently troublesome symptoms. Pharmacologic agents treat the underlying condition and provide symptomatic relief. The various classes of medications used to treat radiculopathy include steroids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), muscle relaxants, narcotics, and antidepressants. Herbal medicines have been used for centuries in China. In China, many patients with cervical disc disease are increasingly turning to herbal medicines to alleviate their symptoms and reduce the side effects of medications. The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy and efficacy of an herbal medicine, Qishe Pill, to treat cervical radiculopathy.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Cervical radiculopathy is a distinct consideration in the evaluation of any patients who have neck pain and may be defined simply as an abnormality of a nerve root, which originates in the cervical spine. The initial approach to the management of cervical spondylopathy radiculopathy is nearly the same that the nonspecific neck or back pain can be found in most of patients. Conservative treatments include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), narcotics, muscle relaxants, physical therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). The main objectives of conservative treatments are to relieve pain, improve function and improve health-related quality of life.However, these treatments for cervical radiculopathy are limited by their modest effectiveness. Surgical treatment for cervical disc disease is indicated when symptoms are refractory to conservative treatments and neurological symptoms are progressive. In terms of pharmacotherapy, there generally is no randomized, placebo-controlled trial available comparing the standard nonsurgical treatments. Therefore, care plans should be designed principally based on accumulated experience, the services available locally, and the respective preferences of patients. Treatment plans are developed to alleviate pain, improve function, and prevent recurrences.

As a complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), herbal medicines have the potential to avoid the adverse effects of medications and surgery.In the basic theory of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), the obstruction of Qi flow and blood circulation in the neck area caused by some pathogenic factors, such as "Feng"(wind), "Han"(cold), "Shi"(dampness), invading the neck, induces cervical degenerative disc diseases which are the cause of cervical radiculopathy. According to the four traditional methods of diagnosis - observation, listening, interrogation, and pulse-taking, on patients, TCM doctors can analyze the certain pathogenic factors which cause neck pain. And then they will prescribe herbal formulae based on the effect and the main indications of Chinese medicine. Natural substances, including herbal medicines, have being used to promote healing and alleviate neck pain in western countries. Previous studies have demonstrated that some active substances in herbal medicine can promote Qi flow and blood circulation to alleviate pain.

A number of studies on the effects of the Chinese herbal medicine on cervical radiculopathy have been proposed, but useful empirical research is insufficiency. For chronic neck pain with or without radicular symptoms, there is low quality evidence that herbal is more effective than placebo for pain relief, which is measured at the end of the treatment. However, the size of the studies was small and the effect was measured in the short-term. Further research is very likely to change both the effect size and our confidence in the results. There is a need for trials with adequate numbers of participants that address long-term efficacy or effectiveness of herbal medicine compared to placebo.

Qishe Pill is composed of processed Radix Astragali, Muscone, Szechuan Lovage Rhizome, Radix Stephaniae Tetrandrae, Ovientvine, Calculus Bovis Artifactus. Using a well-designed clinical trial, we will survey the effectiveness of concurrent use of this remedy in relieving neck pain. Therefore, the present study is to examine effectiveness and safety of Qishe Pill, a compound traditional Chinese herbal medicine, on neck pain in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Results of this study will provide evidence regarding the value of the Qishe Pill as an intervention to alleviate neck pain caused by cervical radiculopathy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

240

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Changchun, China
        • Completed
        • No.1 Hospital, Changchun University of TCM
      • Lanzhou, China
        • Completed
        • Gansu Hospital of TCM
      • Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Completed
        • Huadong Hospital
      • Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Completed
        • Longhua Hospital
      • Suzhou, China
        • Recruiting
        • Suzhou Hospital of TCM
        • Contact:
          • Hong Jiang, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Xiang Qin, Master

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical diagnosis of chronic neck pain since at least 3 months and complaints for a maximum duration of 5 years.
  • average pain intensity of the last 7 days more or equal to 25 points measured by a Neck Disability Index.
  • intellectual and physical ability to participate in the study.
  • informed consent.
  • One positive result of Brachial Plexus Traction Test, Cervical compression test or Cervical distraction test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cervical pain related to malignancy
  • cervical pain due to an accident
  • inflammatory joint disorders
  • previous spine surgery
  • protrusion/prolapse of a spinal disk, spondylolisthesis, with radicular symptomatology
  • actually doing or planning to do other regular physical exercise during the study with possible positive effects on neck pain - such as swimming, yoga, pilates, tai chi, etc.
  • use of pain drugs for other diseases (> 1x/week)
  • pregnancy
  • severe chronic or acute disease interfering with therapy attendance
  • alcohol or substance abuse
  • participation in another clinical trial in the last 6 months before study entry

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Qishe
Pill, 3.75 g, twice per day, four weeks
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control
Qishe Placebo
Pill, 3.75 g, twice per day, four weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain severity(measured with a visual analogue scale, VAS)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 2 weeks
Operationally, the VAS score display as a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, word descriptors anchored at each end. The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current pain. The VAS score is then determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks.
changes from baseline at 2 weeks
pain severity(measured with a visual analogue scale, VAS)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Operationally, the VAS score display as a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, word descriptors anchored at each end. The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current pain. The VAS score is then determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks.
changes from baseline at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SF-36
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 2 weeks
a composite of functional status
changes from baseline at 2 weeks
Neck Disability Index(NDI)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 2 weeks
a composite of functional status
changes from baseline at 2 weeks
Patient satisfaction degree
Time Frame: Changes from baseline at 4 weeks
To evaluate satisfaction
Changes from baseline at 4 weeks
SF-36
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
a composite of functional status
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Neck Disability Index(NDI)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
a composite of functional status
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Neck Disability Index(NDI)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 3 months
a composite of functional status
changes from baseline at 3 months
Neck Disability Index(NDI)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 6 months
a composite of functional status
changes from baseline at 6 months
Safety evaluation
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Safety evaluation
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
The medicine issue
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 2 weeks
changes from baseline at 2 weeks
Compliance assessment
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 2 weeks
To evaluate compliance
changes from baseline at 2 weeks
Compliance assessment
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
To evaluate compliance
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Concomitant medication
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 2 weeks
changes from baseline at 2 weeks
Concomitant medication
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
X-ray(frontal and lateral)
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Kidney function test
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Liver function test
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
ECG
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Occult Blood
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Excrement routine
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Urine routine
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
changes from baseline at 4 weeks
Blood routine
Time Frame: changes from baseline at 4 weeks
changes from baseline at 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 12, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Qishe

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Radiculopathy

Clinical Trials on Qishe Pill

Subscribe