Amphia Premature Infant Pain Study (APIP)

January 16, 2019 updated by: R.H.T. van Beek, Amphia Hospital

Amphia Premature Infant Pain Study; Breast Milk vs Sucrose

Last thirty years, many research was performed concerning pain in the newborn. These investigations showed us the negative effects of pain in the neonatal period. Our research concerns the choice of analgesics for the premature newborn during a heel lance. Newborns with a gestational age of 32-37 weeks are randomly assigned over three groups. They can receive breastfeeding, during the heel lance, a bottle with supplemental breast milk or sucrose.

The primary objective of the Amphia Premature Infant Pain study, is to investigate whether there is a difference in PIPP-scores in premature newborns who undergo a heel lance, receiving breast milk or sucrose. Our hypothesis is that the PIPP-score will be lower in newborns receiving breast milk compared to sucrose. And the investigators presume that breast feeding has the same analgesic effect as giving supplemental breast milk.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord Brabant
      • Breda, Noord Brabant, Netherlands, 4819 VE
        • Amphia Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 2 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • born at a gestational age between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks,
  • being nourished with breast milk
  • the necessity for a clinical blood sample.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • perinatal asphyxia,
  • birth trauma,
  • condition of cardio-respiratory instability,
  • condition of serious nutritional problems with clinical evidence of gastro oesophageal reflux disease,
  • drug abuse of the mother
  • and application of sedative medication to mother or child.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: sucrose
In the third group, newborns receive sucrose 1ml 24% two minutes before procedure, followed by non-nutritive sucking. During the procedure the newborn lies in his cot.
In the third group, newborns receive sucrose 1ml 24% two minutes before procedure, followed by non-nutritive sucking. During the procedure the newborn lies in his cot.
Active Comparator: supplemental breast milk
In group two, the newborns receive supplemental breast milk, lying in the arms of a nurse during the heel lance.
In group two, the newborns receive supplemental breast milk, lying in the arms of a nurse during the heel lance.
Active Comparator: Breast feeding
Newborns who are assigned to group one, receive breastfeeding during the blood sample and thereby have skin-skin contact between mother and child.
Newborns who are assigned to group one, receive breastfeeding during the blood sample and thereby have skin-skin contact between mother and child.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain scores assessed by the PIPP score
Time Frame: The PIPP score will be assessed during a heellance. This heellance will be performed after one day of life and before two months.
The primary outcome in this trial is the PIPP-score.The PIPP-score is a multidimensional pain assessment measure developed in 1995 . The PIPP-score is validated for procedural and post-operative pain in premature and term newborns.
The PIPP score will be assessed during a heellance. This heellance will be performed after one day of life and before two months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score assessed by the COMFORTneo score
Time Frame: The COMFORTneo score will be assessed during a heellance. This heellance will be performed after one day of life and before two months.
The COMFORTneo is a secondary outcome.The COMFORTneo is a pain assessment measure modified from the COMFORT behaviour scale. In 2009 the COMFORTneo is validated for prolonged pain. The COMFORTneo is not validated for procedural pain yet .
The COMFORTneo score will be assessed during a heellance. This heellance will be performed after one day of life and before two months.
partial correlation between the two pain assessment tools.
Time Frame: up to 2 years
A secondary outcome is the partial correlation between the PIPP-score and the COMFORTneo score for a heellance in babies born with a postconceptional age between 32 and 37 weeks. When all films are observed, the COMFORTneo scores and PIPP scores are evaluated. We measure a partial correlation coefficient between these scores, to compare these two scores.
up to 2 years
intra-class correlation coefficient
Time Frame: up to 2 years
This secondary outcome measure gives us information about the uniformity of the assessment of the films between the three investigators.
up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: RHT v Beek, phd, Amphia hospital Breda

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL30111.101.09

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Infant

Clinical Trials on sucrose

3
Subscribe