Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pasireotide LAR (Long Acting Release) on the Treatment of Patients With Clinically Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenoma. (Passion I)

April 24, 2019 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

An Open-Label, Single Arm, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pasireotide LAR on the Treatment of Patients With Clinically Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenoma

This study assessed pasireotide LAR efficacy on patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas concerning tumor growth.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • CE
      • Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, 04636-000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • PR
      • Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 80030-110
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • RJ
      • Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 21941-913
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • SC
      • Joinville, SC, Brazil, 89201260
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • SP
      • Botucatu, SP, Brazil, 18618-970
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05403 000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04023-900
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-functioning pituitary adenoma ≥ 1cm, patients without any previous treatment for the tumor
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who required a surgical intervention for relief of any sign or symptom associated with tumor compression
  • Previous pituitary surgery
  • Previous medical treatment for pituitary tumor
  • Patients who had received pituitary irradiation within 10 years prior to randomization
  • Prolactin (PRL) levels > 100 ng/mL. PRL evaluation should have been performed with diluted samples to ensure "hook effect." was avoided
  • Patients who presented prolactinomas, acromegaly or Cushing's disease
  • Patients with compression of the optic chiasm causing acute clinically significant visual field defects

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Pasireotide LAR
All patients will receive pasireotide LAR (long acting release) 60 mg every 28 ± 3 days for 24 weeks
20 and 40 mg of powder in vials and 2 mL of vehicle in ampoules (for reconstitution) administered as a depot intragluteal IM (intramuscular) injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Non-functioning Pituitary Adenomas (NFPA) Who Achieve Tumor Volume Reduction of at Least 20% After 24 Weeks (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 weeks
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility.The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor. A change ≥ 20% in the original volume of the tumor was considered to be clinically significant. Evaluable participants required tumor volume assessment at baseline and at week 24.
Baseline up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor Volume Main Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Tumor Volume in Extension Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Tumor Volume Change From Baseline in Main Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Tumor Volume Change From Baseline in Extension Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Tumor Volume Percent Change From Baseline in Main Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Tumor Volume Percent Change From Baseline in Extension Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Percentage of Patients Achieving Tumour Volume Reduction in Main Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Patients Achieving Tumour Volume Reduction of at Least ≥ 20% in Main Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Patients Achieving Tumour Volume Reduction in Extension Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Percentage of Patients Achieving Tumour Volume Reduction of at Least ≥ 20% in Extension Phase (FAS)
Time Frame: baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Tumor volume was evaluated by MRI. MRIs were performed and processed according to the guidelines of the central evaluator's facility. The pituitary adenomas were measured by a neuro-radiologist, using manual tracing together with the imaging analysis software. The largest diameter at any plan determined the maximum diameter of the tumor.
baseline to week 48, 72, 96
Percentage of Participants Reporting Absence and Presence of Relevant Disease-related Symptoms (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at weeks 4, 12,24,48,72, 96
The absence and presence of disease-related symptoms were reported by patients and recorded by the medical staff. Patients classified the symptoms according to a 5-point scale (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe
Baseline and at weeks 4, 12,24,48,72, 96
Mean GH and IGF-1 Hormone Levels During Main and Extension Phases (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Hormone levels, including those of GH, IGF-1, and prolactin were evaluated by a central lab
Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Mean ACTH and Estradiol Hormone Levels During Main and Extension Phases (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Hormone levels, including those of growth hormone (GH),insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin, cortisol, free thyroxine (free T4), and estradiol (for women) or testosterone (for men), were evaluated by a central lab
Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Mean Cortisol Hormone Levels During Main and Extension Phases (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Hormone levels, including those of GH, IGF-1, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin, cortisol, free T4, and estradiol (for women) or testosterone (for men), were evaluated by a central lab
Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Mean LH and FSH Hormone Levels During Main and Extension Phases (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Hormone levels, including those of GH, IGF-1, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin, cortisol, free T4, and estradiol (for women) or testosterone (for men), were evaluated by a central lab
Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Mean Testosterone and Free T4 Hormone Levels During Main and Extension Phases (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Hormone levels, including those of GH, IGF-1, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin, cortisol, free T4, and estradiol (for women) or testosterone (for men), were evaluated by a central lab
Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Mean TSH Hormone Levels During Main and Extension Phases (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Hormone levels, including those of GH, IGF-1, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin, cortisol, free T4, and estradiol (for women) or testosterone (for men), were evaluated by a central lab
Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96
Mean Alpha Subunit Levels in Main and Extension Phases (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at weeks 12,24,48,72, 96
Baseline and at weeks 12,24,48,72, 96
Percentage of Participants With Reduction From Baseline of Alpha Subunit ≥50% in Main and Extension Phases (FAS)
Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately Week 96
Alpha subunit levels were determined at a central laboratory.
Baseline up to approximately Week 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 26, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 12, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-functioning Pituitary Adenoma

Clinical Trials on Pasireotide LAR

Subscribe