Dry Needling Versus Strain-counterstrain on the Upper Trapezius (DNJ)

May 13, 2014 updated by: Eva Segura Ortí, Cardenal Herrera University

Dry Needling Versus Strain Counterstrain Technique: Pilot Study Comparing Effects Over the Upper Trapezius Myofascial Trigger Point

This study investigates the effect of two different techniques (dry needling and Strain-counterstrain manual technique) on the upper trapezius myofascial trigger point (MTP). Subjects with active or latent MTP in this location of the muscle will be identified and will be randomly assigned to one out of three groups: dry needling, strain-counterstrain or placebo manual technique. Pain pressure threshold, provoked pain, pain at rest, neck disability and electromyography (EMG) activity of the upper trapezius will be registered before and after six sessions of treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Valencia
      • Moncada, Valencia, Spain, 46113
        • Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Active myofascial trigger point at the upper trapezius

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed fibromyalgia
  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Facial neuralgia
  • Coagulation alteration
  • Cancer
  • Allergy (included needles)
  • History of cervical or shoulder surgery
  • History of deep venous thrombosis
  • History of myopathy
  • History of infiltration at upper trapezius trigger point
  • Anticoagulant medication
  • Aspirin intake during the last 3 days
  • Drug intake (AINES, narcotics, antiepileptics, or any other analgesic medication)
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dry Needling of trigger point
Deep dry needling will be applied on the upper trapezius myofascial trigger point
Deep dry needling until achieving twitch response of the muscle
Experimental: Strain-counterstraing technique
This manual technique will be applied at the upper trapezius.
A manual technique to release tension of painful muscles.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo manual technique
A technique simulating strain-counterstrain, but without any therapeutic manoeuvre will be applied at the upper trapezius site.
A placebo technique, consisting of manual contact of the therapist with the patient without any further therapeutic approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Pressure Threshold
Time Frame: 6 sessions
Amount of pressure (Kg/cm2) applied at the myofascial trigger point site that elicit pain for the patient will be reported. Analogy pressure algometer(Wagner, FPK 20) will be used.
6 sessions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain at rest
Time Frame: 6 sessions
Visual Analogue Scale
6 sessions
Neck Disability
Time Frame: 6 sessions
Neck Disability Index
6 sessions
Electromyographic activity of the upper trapezius
Time Frame: 6 sessions
Surface EMG will be recorded (MP 100 de BIOPAC Systems; Goleta, California, USA). Electrodes will be located to register activity of the Upper trapezius, according to Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles (SENIAM) guidelines. Microvolts of activity at rest will be recorded. Data will be normalized through calculation of maximal voluntary contraction, so that final data will be reported as a percentage.
6 sessions

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eva Segura-Ortí, PhD, Cardenal Herrera University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 14, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEU UCH 203

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Dry needling

Subscribe