Effects of Dry Needling Technique in Hip Muscles in Subjects With Grade I-III Hip Osteoarthritis

October 10, 2018 updated by: Luis Ceballos Laita, Universidad de Zaragoza

Dry needling is a new treatment technique, addressed to mechanical pain of the neuromusculoskeletal system. Recent investigations has developed new hypothesis about the etiology of the osteoarthritis and could be in relation to musculoskeletal disorders, but there is no published studies evaluating the results of this technique in hip osteoarthritis patients.

The objective of this trial is to evaluate if dry needling is more effective in symptoms, function, range of motion, strength, muscular length, pain threshold and compared to sham dry needling and control.

For this purpose the investigators conduct a randomized controlled trial double-blind (patient and examiner). The investigators included patients diagnosed of hip osteoarthritis Grade I-III by Scale of Kellgren and Lawrence.

Patients included are randomized into 3 groups one receive Dry needling, other sham dry needling and the other is a control. Groups receive 3 treatment sessions.

The variables are measured at the beginning and end of treatment. And also some variables are measured before and after each session. Patients who participated in sham dry needling or control group, when the intervention finish the investigators will be given the opportunity to receive the actual technique.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50008
        • Luis Ceballos Laita

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed medically with a X-Ray test
  • American College of Rheumatology Criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary osteoarthritis by a traumatism, Paget disease, inflammatory or metabolic disease, congenital diseases etc.
  • Vascular or neurological disease.
  • Musculoskeletal pathologies in lumbar spine, pelvis or lower limbs
  • Grade IV in Kellgren and Laurence Scale
  • Fear of needles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Dry needling
Dry needling technique in each active myofascial trigger point once per week for 3 weeks.
Dry needling is a skilled intervention that uses a thin filiform needle to penetrate the skin and stimulate underlying myofascial trigger points, muscular, and connective tissues for the management of neuromusculoskeletal pain and movement impairments.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham Dry needling
Sham Dry needling technique in each active myofascial trigger point once per week for 3 weeks.
Sham Dry needling use a non-penetrating acupuncture needle
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Control group. No intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Capacity with functional tests
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators measure the functional capacity with functional test: "test Up and Go" (TUG), "20 and 40 meters self-placed" and "30 seconds-chair stand" at baseline
Baseline
Intensity symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators measure the intensity of with a visual analogic scale pre-intervention at baseline
Baseline
Intensity symptoms
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 21 days
The investigators measure the intensity of with a visual analogic scale at the end of the intervention (3 weeks after baseline the investigators measure the intensity of symptoms through study completion, an average 21 days)
through study completion, an average 21 days
Functional Capacity with functional tests
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 21 days
The investigator measure the functional capacity with functional test: "Test Up and Go" (TUG test), "20 and 40 meters self-placed" and "30 seconds-chair and stand" at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 21 days).
through study completion, an average 21 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hip Range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators measure the hip range of motion with an inclinometer at baseline
Baseline
Hip Range of motion
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 21 days
The investigators measure the hip range of motion with an inclinometer at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 21 days)
through study completion, an average 21 days
Muscular strength
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators measure the hip strength with a hand held dynamometer (Lafayette) at baseline
Baseline
Muscular strength
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 21 days
The investigators measure the hip strength with a hand held dynamometer (Lafayette) at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 21 days)
through study completion, an average 21 days
Muscular length
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators measure the muscular length with Passive Knee Extension test, ELY test, and modified Ober test at baseline
Baseline
Muscular length
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 21 days
The investigators measure the muscular length with Passive Knee Extension test, ELY test, and modified Ober test at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 21 days)
through study completion, an average 21 days
Pain threshold
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators measure the pain threshold with a digital algometer in myofascial trigger points of the hip muscles, and also other bone areas to discriminate a central sensitization at baseline
Baseline
Pain threshold
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 21 days
The investigators measure the pain threshold with a digital algometer in myofascial trigger points of the hip muscles, and also other bone areas to discriminate a central sensitization at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 21 days)
through study completion, an average 21 days
Anxiety and depression with a validated questionnaire (HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators measure the anxiety and depression with HADS questionnaire at baseline
Baseline
Anxiety and depression with a validated questionnaire (HADS)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 21 days
The investigators measure the anxiety and depression with HADS questionnaire at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 21 days)
through study completion, an average 21 days
Functional capacity with a validated questionnaire (WOMAC)
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigator measure the functional capacity with WOMAC questionnaire at baseline
Baseline
Functional capacity with a validated questionnaire (WOMAC)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 21 days
The investigator measure the functional capacity with WOMAC questionnaire at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 21 days)
through study completion, an average 21 days
Gait in treadmill
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigator measure gait pattern in treadmill using wearable inertial sensors to track body kinematics during gait
Baseline
Gait in treadmill
Time Frame: through study completion
The investigator measure gait pattern in treadmill using wearable inertial sensors to track body kinematics during gait
through study completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The patient data were confidential and were assigned a number to each patient to maintain confidentiality

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Dry needling

3
Subscribe