Blacks and Exacerbations on Long Acting Beta Agonists (LABA) vs. Tiotropium (BELT) (BELT)

March 28, 2018 updated by: Elliot Israel, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Blacks and Exacerbations on LABA vs. Tiotropium (BELT)

We are doing this study to learn how genes affect the way that people, specifically Black people, respond to treatment for asthma. Recent studies suggest that people respond differently to some asthma medications (eg Serevent, Foradil). Some people feel better when they use these inhalers, but others may not, and some people get worse. It seems that this difference shows up more often in Blacks than in Whites, which is why we are looking for Black subjects for this study. In all people, this difference seems to depend on their genes or DNA. This study is comparing the use of long acting asthma medications (Serevent, Foradil) to Tiotropium (Spiriva) for the treatment of asthma. Spiriva is used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study will help to see if this medication is also useful for treating asthma and whether it works better for some people than the current asthma medications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease that affects over 22 million people in the United States. Asthma produces 500,000 hospital admissions and accounts for 10.1 million days of lost work in adults annually. Asthma has been designated a priority condition of the Effective Health Care Program.

Blacks bear a disproportionate burden of asthma morbidity and mortality. In its 2005 report on ethnic disparities in health care, AHRQ identified hospital admissions for asthma as the second largest disparity in quality of health care for Blacks vs. Caucasians.

Long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) produce extended increases in airway caliber among patients with asthma via action at the beta2-adrenergic receptor (ADRB2). Adding a LABA to an inhaled corticosteroid controller medication (ICS), can decrease asthma symptoms for many individuals and appears to decrease asthma exacerbations. LABA/ICS has become the most commonly prescribed ICS containing medication.

Drugs acting at ADRB2, including LABAs, have been associated with rare loss of long-term asthma control and increased serious adverse outcomes including death and respiratory failure, even when used with ICS. The risk appears four to five-fold greater in Blacks than non-Black patients with asthma.

Consensus guidelines recommend LABAs be added to ICS in those not completely controlled on ICS alone. These recommendations are based on weighing data on the benefit demonstrated in the general population vs. the rare risk of serious adverse outcomes and balancing the apparent benefits vs. the risks of LABAs (Kramer 2009). However, it appears that LABA/ICS may be significantly less effective in Blacks than Caucasians. Comparison of studies with LABA/ICS in Blacks vs. studies where Blacks were a small minority suggests that Blacks may have much less benefit than other racial groups. Additionally, recent data (Wechsler 2009) suggest that a polymorphism at the 16th position of the ADRB2 gene identifies a group of Blacks (those homozygous for arginine (Arg16Arg)) in whom the response of adding a LABA to an ICS is further diminished. This polymorphism is present in ~20% of US Blacks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1070

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • Edward Waters College Medical Center (Mayo)
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30067
        • Urban Family Practice
      • Newton, Georgia, United States, 39870
        • Albany Area Primary Healthcare, Inc
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Wayne State University
    • Mississippi
      • Canton, Mississippi, United States, 39046
        • G.A. Carmichael F.H.C.
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64130
        • Swope Parkway Health Center
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10462
        • Montefiore Medical Group
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14215
        • UNYNET - Jefferson Family Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Kannapolis, North Carolina, United States, 28081
        • Carolinas Medical Center - NorthEast (Lovelace)
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
      • Shaker Heights, Ohio, United States, 44120
        • Family Medicine Occupational Health Center
    • South Carolina
      • Ridgeland, South Carolina, United States, 29936
        • BJHCHS - Hardeeville Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Black (self-identified, with at least one biological parent identified as Black)
  2. Male and female subjects, ages 18-75
  3. Ability to provide informed consent
  4. Clinical history consistent with asthma for > 1 year.
  5. Ability to perform pulmonary function tests
  6. FEV1 > 40% of predicted
  7. Receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA combination therapy, or ICS moderate dose monotherapy and baseline ACQ>1.25
  8. Non-smoker for past year (total lifetime smoking history < 10 pack-years)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of greater than the equivalent of 1000 mcg inhaled fluticasone daily
  2. Chronic use of oral corticosteroids or Anti IgE for asthma
  3. Lung disease other than asthma or diagnosis of vocal cord dysfunction.
  4. Significant medical illness (other than asthma) that is not stable.
  5. Pregnancy or lactation or an unwillingness to maintain effective birth control.
  6. History of a significant exacerbation of asthma or respiratory tract infection in the prior 4 weeks
  7. History of life-threatening asthma requiring treatment with intubation and mechanical ventilation within 5 years.
  8. Hypo sensitization therapy other than an established maintenance regimen.
  9. Use of inhaled anticholinergic therapy (ipratropium, tiotropium) in prior month
  10. Known contraindication to inhaled tiotropium e.g. narrow angle glaucoma, history of bladder neck obstruction or significant symptoms related to prostatic hypertrophy.
  11. Inability to speak and read English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tiotropium
Tiotropium bromide will be evaluated as a treatment for asthma.
Tiotropium bromide 18 mcg once daily for one year of treatment.
Other Names:
  • Spiriva
Active Comparator: Salmeterol or Formoterol
Long acting beta agonists (Serevent, Foradil) are the standard treatments for moderate asthma. The efficacy of Tiotropium will be compared to this standard.
Salmeterol 50 mcg twice daily for one year of treatment.
Other Names:
  • Serevent
Formoterol 12 mcg twice daily for one year
Other Names:
  • Foradil

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Asthma Exacerbation (Mean Number of Exacerbations/Person-year)
Time Frame: evaluated monthly (on average) via questionnaire for 12 months
We summarize the survival experience using mean number of exacerbations/person-year and compare it using the log-rank test comparing kaplan-meier survival curve.
evaluated monthly (on average) via questionnaire for 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in FEV1
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months
Average change in lung function (FEV1) evaluated by spirometry per participant over 12 months
from baseline to 12 months
Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months

Average Change in Asthma Control Score Per Participant Over 12 Months Using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ).

The ACQ has six questions regarding symptoms, rescue short-acting β-agonist use and one about FEV1 % predicted. A 7-point scale (0 = no impairment, 6 = maximum impairment) is used for each question and the ACQ score is the mean value of these questions - hence between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled).

from baseline to 12 months
Change in Asthma Quality of Life (AQLQ)
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months

Average Change in Asthma Quality of Life Score Per Participant Over 12 Months Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ).

The AQLQ has 32 questions in four domains (symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function, and environmental stimuli) and measures the functional problems that are troublesome to individuals with asthma. Symptoms (11 items), Activity Limitation (12 items, 5 of which are individualized), Emotional Function (5 items), and Environmental Exposure (4 items); 7-point Likert scale (7 = not impaired at all - 1 = severely impaired); scores range 1-7, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

from baseline to 12 months
Change in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months

Average Change in Asthma Symptom Utility Score Per Participant Over 12 Months Using the Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI).

The ASUI is an 11-item preference-based outcome measure used in clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies for asthma and is designed to assess the frequency and severity of cough, wheeze, dyspnea, nighttime awakenings, and side effects, weighted according to patient preferences.

4-point Likert scale to assess frequency (not at all, 1 to 3 days, 4 to 7 days, and 8 to 14 days) and severity (not applicable, mild, moderate and severe); scores range from 0 (worst possible symptoms) to 1 (no symptoms).

from baseline to 12 months
Change in Symptom-Free Day Questionnaire (SFDQ)
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months

Average Change in Symptom-Free Days Per Participant Over 12 Months Using the Symptom-Free Day Questionnaire (SFDQ).

The asthma symptom free day questionnaire (SFDQ) quantifies the number of days with neither daytime nor nighttime asthma symptoms, nor awakenings due to asthma symptoms.

from baseline to 12 months
Change in Rescue Medication Use
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months
Average Change in Rescue Medication Use Per Participant Over 12 Months. Monthly questionnaires will evaluate the amount of rescue medication subjects have used on average, measured in puffs per day.
from baseline to 12 months
Change in Moderate Asthma Deterioration
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months
Average Change in Moderate Asthma Deterioration Per Participant Over 12 Months. The definition of a moderate asthma deterioration should include one or more of the following: deterioration in symptoms, deterioration in lung function, or increased rescue bronchodilator use. These features should last for 2 days or more, but not be severe enough to warrant systemic corticosteroid use and/or hospitalization.
from baseline to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 30, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Tiotropium

Subscribe