Local Anaesthetic Infusion For Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

November 12, 2013 updated by: Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Trust

Local Anaesthetic Infusion For Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

More hysterectomies are performed laparoscopically either as a total laparoscopic hysterectomy or as a laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery include quicker hospital discharge, a shorter convalescence and cost effectiveness when compared to open procedures. Laparoscopic hysterectomies (both total and vaginally assisted) can lead to discomfort which may lead to a delay in discharge from hospital. Continuous infusions of local anaesthetic agents given post operatively to the site of operation have the been subject of trials for several operative procedures. To date however there have not been any properly controlled studies evaluating whether there are benefits of giving a local anaesthetic infusion for 48 hours into the pelvis following a total or vaginally assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The investigators therefore propose to investigate whether giving a local anaesthetic infusion in this fashion decreases the amount of rescue and patient controlled analgesia needed, and length of hospital stay. In order to do this the investigators wish to conduct a randomised placebo controlled double blind trial.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Surrey
      • Chertsey, Surrey, United Kingdom, KT16 0PZ
        • Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All women undergoing a total laparoscopic or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

Women undergoing surgery for cancer, or are known to be allergic to local anaesthetic agents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Levobupivicaine
levobupivicaine 0.5% continous infusion for 48 hours
Placebo Comparator: 0.9% Saline
0.9% saline continous infusion for 48 hours

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
• Need for 'rescue' analgesia
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
• Pain intensity
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours
Side effects from rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours
Amount of patient controlled analgesia needed
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours
Patient satisfaction with pain relief
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeremy T Wright, MD FRCOG, Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2010JTW01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Levobupivicaine

Subscribe