Oleogel-S10 in Wound Healing of Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa (BEB-10)

May 27, 2017 updated by: Birken AG

Open, Prospective, Controlled Case Series Documentation to Compare Intra-individually the Efficacy and Tolerance of Sericare® Versus Non-adhesive Wound Dressing Alone in Accelerating the Epithelialization of Skin Lesions of Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa Hereditaria

The purpose of this study was to compare intra-individually the reepithelialization of skin lesion(s) in inherited Epidermolysis bullosa (either 1 wound ≥10 cm2 and ≤200 cm2 in size divided in 2 equal halves or 2 comparable wounds of ≥5 cm2 each) treated with Oleogel-S10 and non-adhesive wound dressing versus non-adhesive wound dressing only.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was designed as an open-label, prospective, controlled, blindly evaluated, monocentric phase II case series documentation in patients with inherited Epidermolysis bullosa (EB). The investigator either identified 1 EB wound ≥10 cm2 and ≤200 cm2 in size and divided it into 2 halves or selected 2 comparable wounds of ≥5 cm2 each. One (half of the) EB wound was treated with Oleogel-S10 and non-adhesive wound dressing. The other wound (half) was covered with a non-adhesive wound dressing only (Mepilex®) as control. Wound dressings were changed about every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'. This was an open-label study. The investigator, the participant, and the sponsor knew the identity of the treatment. Two independent experts were blind to treatment and assessed efficacy based on chronological series of cropped and coded photographs by wound (half) that were taken before start of treatment, during wound dressing changes and at the end of treatment on Day 14/Day 28.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Freiburg, Germany, 79104
        • EB Center at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 95 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 1-95 years
  2. Patient and/or his/her legal representative was informed, read and understood the patient information/informed consent form and gave written informed consent
  3. Patients with inherited EB with at least 1 skin lesion between 10 cm2 and 200 cm2 (alternatively 2 comparable lesions of at least 5 cm2 each)
  4. Patient and/or his/her legal representative was able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions including the following:

    1. Application of Oleogel-S10 on (1 half of) the wound at every wound dressing change
    2. Regular visits during the treatment period (14 days in 'recent wounds' to 28 days in 'chronic wounds')
  5. Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential within 7 days before start of treatment
  6. Women of childbearing potential agreed to use an effective method of contraception (Pearl Index < 1, e.g. hormonal contraception including the combined oral contraceptive pill, the transdermal patch, and the contraceptive vaginal ring, intrauterine devices or sterilization) during treatment and for at least 6 months thereafter
  7. Men of procreative capacity agreed to use an effective method of contraception during treatment and for at least 6 months thereafter

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Systemic treatment with steroids during the last 30 days
  2. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or diabetic ulcers
  3. Diseases or conditions that could, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the assessment of safety, tolerance or efficacy
  4. Skin disorders adversely affecting wound healing or involving the areas eligible for study treatment
  5. Hypersensitivity to the trial medication or surgical dressings to be used
  6. Multiple allergic disorders
  7. Administration of investigational drugs within 3 months before screening
  8. Investigations or changes in management for an existing medical condition
  9. Low probability to complete the study per protocol for whatever reason

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oleogel-S10
The eligible wound (half) was topically treated with Oleogel-S10 and covered with a non-adhesive wound dressing (Mepilex®) on Day 0. Wound dressings were changed about every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'.
1 cm or 125 µL or 115 mg Oleogel-S10 per cm2 wound area (corresponds to thickness of approximately 1 mm or 0.04 inch) every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'.
Other Names:
  • Sericare®
Mepilex® soft silicone faced polyurethane foam dressing was changed about every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'.
Other Names:
  • Cutaneous patch
Other: Non-adhesive wound dressing
Mepilex® soft silicone faced polyurethane foam dressing was used as non-active comparator. The eligible wound (half) was covered with Mepilex® as control on Day 0. Wound dressings were changed about every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'.
Mepilex® soft silicone faced polyurethane foam dressing was changed about every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'.
Other Names:
  • Cutaneous patch

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra-individual Difference in Reepithelialization of Wound (Halves) at Day 14 in 'Recent Wounds' or Day 28 in 'Chronic Wounds'
Time Frame: 14 days for 'recent wounds', 28 days for 'chronic wounds'
The primary end point was the progress of reepithelialization from baseline to either Day 14 ('recent wounds') or Day 28 ('chronic wounds') of the EB wound (half) treated with Oleogel-S10 and non-adhesive wound dressing (Mepilex®) intra-individually compared to the other wound (half) covered with non-adhesive wound dressing only (intra-individual comparison). Two independent experts were blind to treatment and assessed efficacy based on chronological series of cropped and coded photographs by wound (half) that were taken before start of treatment, during wound dressing changes and at the end of treatment on Day 14/Day 28. They evaluated each series and decided whether 1 wound (half) reepithelialized faster than the other ('winner'), or whether there was no difference in reepithelialization.
14 days for 'recent wounds', 28 days for 'chronic wounds'

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Wound Epithelialization at Day 7±1
Time Frame: Day 7±1
The secondary endpoint was the intra-individual difference in median percentage of wound epithelialization at Day 7±1. Sizes of wound areas were measured using a digital wound evaluation program from the EB Center at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Freiburg.
Day 7±1
Percentage of Wound Epithelialization at Day 14±1
Time Frame: Day 14±1
The secondary endpoint was the intra-individual difference in median percentage of wound epithelialization at Day 14±1. Sizes of wound areas were measured using a digital wound evaluation program from the EB Center at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Freiburg.
Day 14±1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Agnes Schwieger-Briel, MD, University Medical Center Freiburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa

Clinical Trials on Oleogel-S10

Subscribe