- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01307215
TAP Block: Does Volume Make a Difference?
April 23, 2013 updated by: McMaster University
Lumbar Transversus Abdominal Plane (TAP) Block: Does Volume Make a Difference?
Patients who have abdominal surgery will experience pain from the incision.
The lumbar TAP block is a procedure used to reach the nerve endings in the abdominal wall so that there is a reduction in pain after surgery.
Using ultrasound guidance, a solution of ropivacaine will be injected after surgery.
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of changes in the volume of the injection.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Pain from a surgical incision happens in most patients.
During the perioperative period, the use of the TAP block has been shown to reduce pain scores, opioid consumption and sedation scores.
Also, there is a trend towards a reduction of post-operative nausea and vomiting.
The aim of the block is to reach the distal nerve endings of the abdominal wall from T6 to L1 dermatomes using ultrasound guidance with a single shot of ropivacaine at different volumes.
Currently, there is consensus about optimal procedure-specific volumes and local anesthetic concentrations for lumbar TAP blocks.
This is a pilot study and the purpose being is it feasible to do a large scale clinical study to determine the influence of increasing the local anesthetic volume.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
31
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
- St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-70 years old
- total abdominal hysterectomy
- capable of completing informed consent
- no previous chronic opioid use
- no previous abdominal wall surgeries
Exclusion Criteria:
- patient refusal
- contraindication to regional anesthesia: coagulopathy, anticoagulant use, bleeding disorders,
- local or systemic infection
- local anesthetic allergy
- BMI>35
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 20mLs of 0.5% ropivacaine per side
|
20mLs of 0.5%
Other Names:
30mLs of 0.33%
Other Names:
40mLs of 0.25%
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 30mLs of 0.33% ropivacaine per side
|
20mLs of 0.5%
Other Names:
30mLs of 0.33%
Other Names:
40mLs of 0.25%
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 40mLs of 0.25% ropivacaine per side
|
20mLs of 0.5%
Other Names:
30mLs of 0.33%
Other Names:
40mLs of 0.25%
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To assess the feasibility of a large scale clinical study to determine the influence on increasing the local anesthetic volume.
Time Frame: 6 month
|
This will be shown as a number and a percenttage of patients recruited and randomized.
|
6 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Using ice and pinprick, determine the dermatomal block distribution at 2,6,12,24 and 48 hours post block.
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
The assessor will measure the extend of the block distribution at the various time intervals.
|
48 hours
|
|
Pain scores at 2,6,12,24, and 48 hours post-block.
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Using a visual analog scale, patient pain scores will be assessed.
|
48 hours
|
|
Patient-controlled analgesia opioid requirements at 2,6,12,24 and 48 post-block.
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Record drug consumption at the time intervals
|
48 hours
|
|
Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting at 2,6,12,24, and 48 hours.
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
48 hours
|
|
|
Block failure rate.
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Block failure rate is defined as the lack of any sensory block following the TAP block.
|
48 hours
|
|
Patient's overall satisfaction.
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Using a LIKERT score, patient satisfaction will be measured.
|
48 hours
|
|
Discharge time from PACU.
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
The time in which the patient is discharged from the recovery room.
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mauricio Forero, MD, McMaster University/St. Joseph's Healthcare
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2056-60. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181871313.
- Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H, Dahl JB. The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 May;54(5):529-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02215.x. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
- Forero M, Heikkila A, Paul JE, Cheng J, Thabane L. Lumbar transversus abdominis plane block: the role of local anesthetic volume and concentration-a pilot, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Mar 25;1:10. doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0002-6. eCollection 2015.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 28, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
March 2, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
April 24, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 23, 2013
Last Verified
May 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 10-3436
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Post-operative Pain
-
Liaquat National Hospital & Medical CollegeCompletedPain | Post-operative Pain | Post-operative Pain ControlPakistan
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Complications | Chronic Post Operative Pain | Acute Post Operative PainTaiwan
-
Unity Health TorontoAFP Innovation FundRecruitingSpinal Surgery | Post-operative Pain Management | Post-operative CareCanada
-
MercyOne Des Moines Medical CenterTerminatedPost Operative Pain | Post Operative Nausea and VomitingUnited States
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
University Tunis El ManarCompletedPost-operative Pain | Post-operative AnxietyTunisia
-
E-DA HospitalNot yet recruitingCesarean Section | Post Operative Pain, Acute | Post Operative Pain, ChronicTaiwan
-
Mount Sinai Hospital, CanadaWomen's College HospitalRecruitingSurgery | Laparoscopy | Post-operative Pain | Laparoscopic | Post-operative Recovery | PenumoperitoneumCanada
-
University of HaifaRecruiting
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingPost Operative Pain
Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine
-
Northern Jiangsu People's HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Peking University First HospitalCompletedEpidural Analgesia | Labor Pain | Dexmedetomidine | Esketamine | Ropivacaine | SufentanilChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruiting
-
Sahiwal medical college sahiwalCompletedBradycardia | Post Operative Analgesia | Opioid Sparing Anaesthesia | Hypotension, Controlled | Stoma Reversal ProcedurePakistan
-
Fudan UniversityNot yet recruitingBreast Neoplasms | Anesthesia, Local | Surgical Procedures, Operative | Pulmonary Ventilation | Intercostal Nerve Block
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingAnesthesia | Hallux ValgusBelgium
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRecruitingNerve Block | Ropivacaine | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Total Knee AnthroplastyChina
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruitingAdolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) | Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis | Neuromuscular ScoliosisUnited States
-
Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRecruitingAnalgesia | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Preperitoneal InfiltrationChina
-
University Health Network, TorontoUnknownPIB Versus CI Through a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheter for Analgesia Following Major Ankle SurgeryPain, PostoperativeCanada