Magna Mitral - 23mm

March 16, 2020 updated by: Edwards Lifesciences

Clinical Evaluation of the Size 23mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Mitral Bioprosthesis, Model 7000TFX

The purpose of this clinical study is to obtain human clinical data that demonstrates that the size 23mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna mitral pericardial valve, model 7000TFX, is a safe and effective replacement heart valve.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-site, descriptive study. A minimum of 15 and up to 20 subjects will be implanted at a minimum of 2 and up to 8 participating investigational sites within the US and internationally.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Krakow, Poland, 31-202
        • The John Paul II Hospital in Krakow
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
        • Florida Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Hospital
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University
    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has mitral valve disease requiring surgical replacement
  2. Patient has provided written informed consent prior to mitral valve surgery
  3. Patient is expected to survive surgery and be discharged
  4. Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations
  5. Patient is 13 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has life expectancy < 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions;
  2. Patient has/had active endocarditis within the last 3 months
  3. Patient requires replacement of a native or previously implanted prosthetic, tricuspid, pulmonic or aortic valve;
  4. Patient was previously enrolled and implanted in the study
  5. Patient has/had prior aortic, tricuspid and/ or pulmonary valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve or mechanical valve that will remain in situ
  6. Patient has a body surface area (BSA) > 1.9m2
  7. Female patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating
  8. Patient has a documented history of substance ( drug or alcohol) abuse
  9. Patient is currently a prison inmate
  10. Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study
  11. Patient is undergoing renal dialysis for chronic renal failure or has hyperparathyroidism
  12. Patient has active myocarditis
  13. Patient has had an acute preoperative neurological deficit, myocardial infarction, or cardiac event and has not returned to baseline or stabilized > 30 days prior to the planned v alve implant surgery
  14. Patient has an abnormality such as an aortic aneurysm (e.g. due to cystic medial necrosis or Marfan's syndrome), aortic dissection, or ventricular aneurysm that might place

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: All subjects receive implant
Subjects serve as own control
Heart valve surgery: CEP Magna Mitral Model 7000 TFX

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Early Adverse Events Divided
Time Frame: Events occuring within 30 days of procedure
Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the number of enrolled subjects times 100.
Events occuring within 30 days of procedure
Percent of Late Adverse Events
Time Frame: Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).
Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days
Time Frame: >30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Subject's freedom from Serious Adverse Events at > 30 days post-implant. Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
>30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurement
Time Frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant
Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject's Average Mean Gradient Measurement
Time Frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the mitral valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve.
Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Subject's Average Peak Gradient Measurement
Time Frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the mitral valve as measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurement
Time Frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve divided by the person's body surface area. Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Subject's Average Performance Index Measurement
Time Frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant
Performance index is defined as the subject's effective orifice area (the cross sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the mitral valve) divided by the subject's native orifice area. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-Implant
Subject's Average Cardiac Output
Time Frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.
Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Subject's Average Cardiac Index
Time Frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Cardiac index is an assessment that divides the cardiac output from the left ventricle in one minute by the person's body surface area (BSA), thus relating heart performance to the size of the individual.
Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Subject's Average Left Ventricular Mass Regression
Time Frame: Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Patients can experience an enlargement of the left ventricle (chamber) of their heart because it works harder with a defective heart valve. Left ventricular mass regression evaluates if the patient experiences a decrease in the size of the left ventricle (chamber) after the repair or replacement of their heart valve.
Pre-procedure and 1 Year post-implant
Subject's Severity of Central Mitral Regurgitation at 1 Year Post-implant.
Time Frame: 1 Year post-implant
Mitral valvular regurgitation occurs when the mitral valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Mitral valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation.
1 Year post-implant
Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Laboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen.
Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell (WBC) Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection.
Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Laboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the plasma (liquid portion of the blood).
Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Subject's Average Plasma Free Hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Laboratory Analysis of Plasma Free Hemoglobin on blood drawn from subjects. This blood test measures the level of free hemoglobin in the plasma (liquid portion of the blood).
Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Laboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells.
Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Subject's Average Platelet Count
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Laboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting.
Baseline, 6 Month, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Number and Percentage of Subjects in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 1 Year Post-Implant.
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 Year post-implant

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life.

Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

Baseline and 1 Year post-implant
Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 6 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life.

Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea.

Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

6 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time
Time Frame: 6 Months and 1 Year post-implant
The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale is indexed and ranges from a minimum of 0.275 and a maximum of 1.000. A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems.
6 Months and 1 Year post-implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2008-07

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Heart Valve Disease

Clinical Trials on Implantation of CEP Magna Mitral Model 7000TFX

Subscribe