A Study That Evaluates the Decrease in Irritation When Using Additional Acne Treatment Products

February 14, 2012 updated by: Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

An Investigator-Blind, Phase 4 Study Assessing Mitigation of Facial Irritation When Comparing the Use of Two Acne Treatment Products (Retin-A Micro® 0.1 % Pump and Aczone®) With One Treatment Product (Retin-A Micro® 0.1 % Pump) Using a Split-Face Model

This study is to see if there's any difference in the amount of facial irritation when two acne products are used together on one side of the face, compared to one acne treatment product used alone on the other side of the face. All people participating in this trial will be required to return to the same study center every weekday for two weeks for the investigator to check for irritation on the face and to have the products applied - on weekends they will have to put them on at home. If one side of the face is more irritated than the other side, a picture will be taken as well.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is an investigator-blind, randomized, balanced study comparing two treatment regimens in a split-face model. All subjects will apply Retin-A Micro Gel (tretinoin) 0.1 % Pump, and Aczone Gel (dapsone) 5% daily to one side of the face (with 1 hour between applications, applying Aczone Gel first) and Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1 % Pump to the other side of the face in a randomized scheme for two consecutive weeks. Subjects will return to the study center daily for evaluation and for application of both products (weekend applications will be done at home). At each visit the subject will be evaluated and scored for irritation and cutaneous treatment effects. Subjects presenting with differences in irritation between one side of the face and the other will be photographed and have chromometer readings taken. A single treatment center is expected to enroll at least 24 subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Broomall, Pennsylvania, United States, 19008
        • Skin Study Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 36 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II or III with healthy skin as judged by the investigator
  • Bilateral skin is clear of any confounding irritation, rashes, acne, rosacea, etc., prior to study start
  • Subjects are willing to avoid applying emollients or cosmetics to the face 24 hours before they start, and during the study
  • If subject is of childbearing potential, subject has been using a protocol-approved method of birth control for a certain amount of time, and is willing to continue using it throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are pregnant or nursing, or intend to be during the study
  • Subjects with any condition or medical history, or using any drug or medication, that might negatively affect the subject's safety or the validity of study results, either as listed in the protocol or in the opinion of the investigator
  • Subjects who have facial hair that may obstruct or hinder the evaluation of any reactions
  • Subjects who use any known photosensitizing agents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dapsone plus Tretinoin Gel
Dapsone gel, followed by tretinoin gel one hour later, applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks - all subjects participate in both arms in a split-face model
Dapsone gel, followed by tretinoin gel one hour later, applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks
Other Names:
  • Aczone Gel 5% plus Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1% Pump
Active Comparator: Tretinoin Gel Alone
Tretinoin gel applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks - all subjects participate in both arms in a split-face model
Tretinoin gel applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks
Other Names:
  • Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1% Pump

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Expert Grader Assessment - Erythema
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks
Ordinal erythema scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=severe scaling and fissuring) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Expert Grader Assessment - Dryness
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks
Ordinal dryness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=deep) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Baseline to 2 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject Assessment - Burning/Stinging
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks
Ordinal burning/stinging scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Subject Assessment - Itching
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks
Ordinal itching scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Subject Assessment - Tightness
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks
Ordinal tightness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Facial Tolerance
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks
All interval measurements were combined for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Facial tolerance is the sum of scores from Erythema, Dryness, Burning/Stinging, Itching, and Tightness assessments, reported in Outcome Measures 1-5. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 6250 (highest possible combined score of 25, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Baseline to 2 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: David Lineberry, Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 15, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acne Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on Dapsone plus Tretinoin Gel

Subscribe