Genetically Engineered Lymphocyte Therapy After Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With High-Risk, Intermediate-Grade, B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

April 22, 2026 updated by: City of Hope Medical Center

Phase I/II Study of Cellular Immunotherapy Using Central Memory-Enriched CD8+ T Cells Lentivirally Transduced to Express A CD19-Specific Chimeric Immunoreceptor Following Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With High-Risk Intermediate Grade B-Lineage Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of genetically engineered lymphocyte therapy and to see how well it works after peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) in treating patients with high-risk, intermediate-grade, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Genetically engineered lymphocyte therapy may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. Giving rituximab together with chemotherapy before a PBSCT stops the growth of cancer cells by stopping them from dividing or killing them. Giving colony-stimulating factors, such as filgrastim (G-CSF), or plerixafor helps stem cells move from the bone marrow to the blood so they can be collected and stored. More chemotherapy or radiation therapy is given to prepare the bone marrow for the stem cell transplant. The stem cells are then returned to the patient to replace the blood-forming cells that were destroyed by the chemotherapy. Giving genetically engineered lymphocyte therapy after PBSCT may be an effective treatment for NHL.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the safety of cellular immunotherapy utilizing ex vivo expanded autologous central memory T cell (TCM)-enriched cluster of differentiation (CD)8+ T cells genetically-modified to express a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) in conjunction with a standard myeloablative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) for research participants with high-risk intermediate grade B-lineage non-Hodgkin lymphomas who have relapsed after primary therapy, or who did not achieve complete remission with primary therapy. (Phase I) II. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) on dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and to describe the full toxicity profile. (Phase I) III. To determine the rate of research participants receiving TCM-enriched CD8+ T cells genetically-modified to express a CD19-specific CAR for which the transferred cells are detected in the circulation 28 days (+/- 3 days) by woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcriptional regulatory element (WPRE) quantitative (Q)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). (Phase II)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the tempo, magnitude, and duration of engraftment of the transferred T cell product as it relates to the number of cells infused. (Phase II) II. To study the impact of this therapeutic intervention on the development of CD19+ B-cell precursors in the bone marrow as a surrogate for the in vivo effector function of transferred CD19-specific T cells. (Phase II) III. To describe the progression-free and overall survival of treated research participants on this protocol. (Phase II)

OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study of genetically engineered lymphocyte therapy followed by a phase II study.

Patients receive standard salvage chemotherapy per standard practice and undergo standard mobilization for stem cell collection with filgrastim and/or plerixafor. Some patients may also receive rituximab intravenously (IV) within 4 weeks of transplant. Patients receive standard myeloablative conditioning followed by autologous PBSCT. Patients then undergo infusion of ex vivo expanded autologous TCM-enriched CD8+ T cells expressing CD19-specific CAR on day 2 or 3 after transplant.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for at least 15 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • City of Hope (COH) pathology review confirms that research participant's diagnostic material is consistent with history of intermediate grade B-cell NHL (e.g., diffuse B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, transformed follicular lymphoma)
  • History of relapse after achieving first remission with primary therapy, or failure to achieve remission with primary therapy
  • Life expectancy > 16 weeks
  • Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) >= 70%
  • Negative serum pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential
  • Research participant has an indication to be considered for autologous stem cell transplantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fails to understand the basic elements of the protocol and/or the risks/benefits of participating in this phase I/II study; evidence of understanding includes passing the Protocol Comprehensive Screening given by the Research Subject Advocate (RSA); a legal guardian may substitute for the research participant
  • Any standard contraindications to myeloablative HSCT per standard of care practices at COH
  • Dependence on corticosteroids
  • Currently enrolled in another investigational therapy protocol
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive based on testing performed within 4 weeks of enrollment
  • History of allogeneic HSCT or prior autologous HSCT
  • Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy
  • Research participant(s) who are to receive radioimmunotherapy (Zevalin-based)-based conditioning regimens
  • Research participant(s) with known active hepatitis B or C infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment (cellular adoptive immunotherapy following PBSCT)
Patients receive standard salvage chemotherapy per standard practice and undergo standard mobilization for stem cell collection with G-CSF and/or plerixafor. Some patients may also receive rituximab IV within 4 weeks of transplant. Patients receive standard myeloablative conditioning followed by autologous PBSCT. Patients then undergo infusion of ex vivo expanded autologous TCM-enriched CD8+ T cells expressing CD19-specific CAR on day 2 or 3 after transplant.
Correlative studies
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Rituxan
  • MabThera
  • ABP 798
  • BI 695500
  • C2B8 Monoclonal Antibody
  • Chimeric Anti-CD20 Antibody
  • CT-P10
  • IDEC-102
  • IDEC-C2B8
  • IDEC-C2B8 Monoclonal Antibody
  • Monoclonal Antibody IDEC-C2B8
  • PF-05280586
  • Rituximab ABBS
  • Rituximab Biosimilar ABP 798
  • Rituximab Biosimilar BI 695500
  • Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10
  • Rituximab Biosimilar GB241
  • Rituximab Biosimilar IBI301
  • Rituximab Biosimilar JHL1101
  • Rituximab Biosimilar PF-05280586
  • Rituximab Biosimilar RTXM83
  • Rituximab Biosimilar SAIT101
  • Rituximab Biosimilar SIBP-02
  • rituximab biosimilar TQB2303
  • rituximab-abbs
  • RTXM83
  • Truxima
Undergo autologous PBSCT
Other Names:
  • Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
  • AHSCT
  • Autologous
  • Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
  • Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
  • Stem Cell Transplantation, Autologous
Given IV
Other Names:
  • G-CSF
  • r-metHuG-CSF
  • Neupogen
  • Filgrastim-aafi
  • Nivestym
  • Recombinant Methionyl Human Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor
  • rG-CSF
  • Tevagrastim
Receive ex vivo expanded autologous TCM-enriched CD8+ T cells expressing CD19-specific CAR
Undergo autologous PBSCT
Other Names:
  • PBPC transplantation
  • Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation
  • Peripheral Stem Cell Support
  • Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation
  • PBSCT
  • Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant
  • PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANT
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Mozobil
  • AMD 3100
  • JM-3100
  • SDZ SID 791

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: Within 28 days of T-cell infusion

Number of DLTs per dose level are reported.

A DLT is defined as:

Any grade 3 or higher toxicity, with the exception of expected adverse events; and designated as definitely or probably related (level of attribution) to the infusion of the TCM cells; and occurring within 28 days of T-cell infusion; Any toxicity requiring the use of steroids to ablate side effects attributable to the infusion of the TCM cells, and occurring within 28 days of T-cell infusion; Any toxicity which is a lower grade, but that increases in grade to a grade 3 or higher as a direct result of the TCM, and occurring within 28 days of T-cell infusion; Any grade 2 or greater autoimmune toxicity, and occurring within 28 days of T-cell infusion.

Within 28 days of T-cell infusion
Woodchuck Hepatitis Virus Post-transcriptional Regulatory Element (WPRE) Detection Above Background
Time Frame: 28 days post T cell infusion
Peak expansion of WPRE is expressed in CAR copy number/mL of blood is summarized with median and range
28 days post T cell infusion
Number of Days of Quantifiable CD19 CAR Post T-cell Infusion
Time Frame: 28 days post T cell infusion
WPRE persistence of quantifiable CD19 CAR summarized with mean and standard deviation
28 days post T cell infusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Failure to Engraft
Time Frame: Within 21 days post T-cell infusion
Count of participants who fail to engraft post transplant.
Within 21 days post T-cell infusion
Progression-free Survival at 1 Year
Time Frame: Up to 1 year

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier methods.

Progression is defined using the revised IWG response criteria, as any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir.

Up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth L Budde, MD,PhD, City of Hope Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 19, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 3, 2013

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 24, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

March 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Subscribe