Telehealth Nursing Intervention for Children With Complex Health Care Needs (CCHCN)

October 30, 2019 updated by: University of Minnesota

Telehealth Nursing Intervention for Children With Complex Health Care Needs

The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a telehealth care coordination and case management nursing intervention for children with complex special health care needs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Children with complex special health care needs are those children who have multiple, complex, chronic health conditions who require health and related services of a type or amount beyond that required by children generally. When these children are hospitalized, they receive services as part of an integrated system that provides centralized record keeping and care orders, clearly identified roles and methods of communication for health professionals involved in their care, an established method to obtain equipment and supplies, and regular monitoring of the child's condition. However, when the same child is cared for at home, services are often fragmented, and rarely accessed and delivered in a coordinated system. The task of coordinating services and sharing information between providers almost always becomes the responsibility of the parent or guardian. Families report that their greatest challenges are the stress of coordinating multiple providers, and the disconnect and lack of communication between services and providers. This study will address these issues, using an advanced practice nurse (APN) program of telehealth care coordination and case management in support of these families. Either the telephone or telephone plus interactive video are used by an advanced practice nurse to provide care coordination and case management. Goals of the program are to (1) reduce the number of crisis or unplanned uses of health care services and increase the number of non-crisis or planned health care service usage, (2) improve the QL (quality of life) for these children and their families, and (3) reduce the deficit between help needed and help received for the families in caring for these children. The study objective will be accomplished using a three armed randomized controlled trial. Children will be randomized into a control group receiving usual care that includes LPN (Licensed practical nurse)-delivered care coordination and RN (registered nurse)-delivered telephone triage, an intervention group receiving APN-delivered telephone care coordination and case management, and another intervention group receiving APN-delivered telephone + video care coordination and case management services. It is hypothesized that as the level of telehealth use in coordination and management increases the utilization of unplanned, or crisis, health care service utilization will decrease, that families will receive more of their needed care, and quality of life for the children and their families will improve

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

163

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Univ Minnesota and St Paul Childrens Hospital and Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children with complex health care needs, in the patient population of the Special Needs Clinic, St Paul Children's Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy children
  • CCHCN children not seen in the Special Needs Clinic at St Paul Children's Hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: control group
Control group arm follows usual care
Experimental: Intervention group arm 1
Intervention group arm 1 receives aprn/telephone care coordination
aprn using either telephone or telephone plus video conferencing will provide triage for CCHCN
Other Names:
  • APRN
Experimental: Intervention group arm 2
Intervention group arm 2 receives aprn/telephone/video care coordination
aprn using either telephone or telephone plus video conferencing will provide triage for CCHCN
Other Names:
  • APRN

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the number of crisis or unplanned uses of health care services by enrolled subject, based on data collected in the Health Care Service Utilization calendar maintained by study subjects, and from the subjects' EMR
Time Frame: 2 year RCT follow-up
This measure will show if the intervention can shift the number of crisis and unplanned health care services utilized to planned service utilization, based on data collected from the subjects' Health Care Service Utilization calendars and their EMR
2 year RCT follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To measure changes in quality of life for CCHCN and their families over the study period, using scores from the PedsQL and PedsQL Family Impact Module instruments.
Time Frame: 2 years RCT follow-up
These measures will determine the effectiveness of the intervention on improving the quality of life for CCHCN subjects and their families, based on scores from the Peds QL and PedsQL Family Module survey instruments
2 years RCT follow-up
To measure the deficit between help needed and help received using the Discrepancy Visual Analog scale
Time Frame: 2 years RCT follow-up
To measure the effectiveness of the intervention on reducing the discrepancy between parents' reported need for help from others and their reported receipt of help from others using the Discrepancy Visual Analog scale
2 years RCT follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stanley Finkelstein, PhD, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Unplanned Use of Health Care Services

Clinical Trials on telehealth plus aprn triage

Subscribe