HIV and Drug Use in Georgian Women (IMEDI)

August 12, 2016 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
The purpose of this study is to determine how drug abuse treatment interventions can be integrated with established Human Immunodeficiency Virus prevention approaches to optimize their combined effectiveness.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Eastern Europe is an emerging epicenter of injection drug use and Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection, among women. Within Eastern Europe, the Republic of Georgia is one of the last countries where an Human Immunodeficiency Virus epidemic can still be averted. This proposal responds to RFA-DA-10-008 International Research Collaborations on Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and Drug Use by building on the successful collaboration among United States and Eastern European investigators from the Republic of Georgia and Russia. Recent data from Georgia's neighbor, Russia, reported 59% of Injection Drug Using women Human Immunodeficiency Virus seropositive; this is a threat that looms over Georgia. Understanding the risk factors that operate in Russia that drive this epidemic may help forestall such a catastrophe in Georgia. As such, this proposal directly responds to the Eastern European Region question of "How can drug abuse treatment interventions be integrated with established Human Immunodeficiency Virus prevention approaches to optimize their combined effectiveness?" Injection drug using Georgian women show prevalence rates of 2% for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and 25% for hepatitis C. The low prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Georgian women provides an important window of opportunity to intervene and avoid the possibility of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus epidemic. In Georgia, women's expected subordination to men makes women vulnerable to Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Hepatitis C infection. The public health impact of the proposed project is far-reaching. Taken to scale, our Georgian reinforcement-based treatment model holds the promise not only to lessen the possibility of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus epidemic and slow the increase in the Hepatitis C transmission rate in Georgia, but also to strongly influence the development of women-focused drug abuse intervention models for treatment tailoring and dissemination in other nations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tbilisi, Georgia, 0177
        • Addiction Research Center, Union Alternative Georgia office

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Conversant in Georgian
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Has ever injected illicit drugs
  • Sexually active at least once in the past 30 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male
  • Younger than 18 years
  • Not sexually active at least once in past 30 days
  • Not able to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RBT Experimental

Intervention for Injection Drug Using Women:

Incorporates elements of Reinforcement-Based Treatment and Women's Health CoOp to help prevent drug abuse (and promote drug abstinence) and lower risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus, violence, and high-risk sexual behaviors.

Other Names:
  • Women's Health CoOp
Active Comparator: Case-Management: Treatment as Usual

Standard Intervention:

Incorporates standard practice elements like accessing resources, service linkage, monitoring the success of patient-service linkages, and advocating for the patient to help her meet her needs

Other Names:
  • Treatment-as-Usual
  • Standard Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sexual practices
Time Frame: 3 months after randomization
Frequency of unprotected sexual acts in the past 30 days measured by revised risk behavior assessment
3 months after randomization
Injection Practices
Time Frame: 6 months after randomization
Frequency of sharing other injection equipment in the past 30 days measured by revised risk behavior assessment
6 months after randomization
Injection practices
Time Frame: 3 months after randomization
Frequency of sharing other injection equipment in the past 30 days measured by revised risk behavior assessment
3 months after randomization
Sexual Practices
Time Frame: 6 months after randomization
Frequency of unprotected sexual acts in the past 30 days measured by revised risk behavior assessment
6 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sexual practices
Time Frame: 3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization
Unprotected sex at last encounter measured by revised risk behavior assessment
3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization
Condom Use and Sexual Encounter Negotiation
Time Frame: 3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization
To use a condom in past 30 days and to negotiate sexual encounters in past 30 days measured by revised risk behavior assessment
3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization
Injecting practices
Time Frame: 3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization
Frequency of sharing other injection equipment in the past 30 days measured by revised risk behavior assessment
3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization
Drug use
Time Frame: 3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization
Frequency of opioid use in past 30 days revised risk behavior assessment plus urine test Self-Report verified by biological sample Poisson. Also frequency of stimulant use in past 30 days revised risk behavior assessment and urine test. Addiction Severity Index drug composite score.
3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization
Alcohol Use
Time Frame: 3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization

Frequency of alcohol use in past 30 days Revised Risk Behavior Assessment and breath test. Self-Report verified by biological sample Poisson.

Addiction Severity Index alcohol composite score.

3 months after randomization and 6 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Irma Kirtadze, MD, Addiction Research Center, Union Alternative Georgia, Tbilisi
  • Principal Investigator: Hendree Jones, PhD, UNC Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Clinical Trials on RBT

Subscribe