Graft Patency Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (MICS)

November 3, 2013 updated by: Medtronic Cardiovascular
This clinical study has been developed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (MICS); a minimally invasive coronary bypass procedure that is done on a beating heart via a smaller chest incision, thus avoiding the invasiveness of the standard procedure.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y4W7
        • University of Ottawa Heart Institute
    • New York
      • Staten Island, New York, United States, 10305
        • Staten Island University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > or equal to 18 and < or equal to 80 years of age
  • Suitable minimally invasive coronary surgery (MICS) candidate for non-emergent first time, single or multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (on pump or off pump)
  • Left ventricle ejection fraction >30%
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent and comply with study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cerebrovascular disease within 90 days of surgery including history of prior stroke.
  • Previous cardiac surgery procedures such as CABG revisions, surgical ablations or valve replacements
  • Congestive heart failure with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV
  • History of renal insufficiency (i.e. prior serum creatinine of >2mg/dl) and/or requiring dialysis
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (i.e. >2 serum glucose concentrations of >350 mg/dl)
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic hypertension (i.e. systolic pressure >160 mmHg)
  • Peripheral/systemic active infection excluding the patient from cardiac surgery
  • Life expectancy of less than 1 year due to other illness such as cancer or pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease
  • Participation in another investigational protocol that may confound the results of this study
  • Female of child bearing potential and lactating or intends to become pregnant during the study
  • Severe distal disease and small posterior lateral targets

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical Success (Graft Patency) in a MICS Approach
Time Frame: At time of procedure (day 1)
For each subject, the endpoint for technical success (graft patency) in a MICS approach is defined as acceptable flow for graft size for an anastamosis. This will be characterized by the surgeon's assessment/angiography after the graft is complete.
At time of procedure (day 1)
Procedural Success in a MICS Approach
Time Frame: At time of procedure (day 1)
A successful procedure can be defined as a procedures not requiring conversion (sternotomy). This will be characterized by whether the graft procedure can be completed through the minimally invasive thoracotomy without having to convert to a sternotomy in order to complete the grafting.
At time of procedure (day 1)
Patency of the Index Graft at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure

For each subject, the endpoint is the percent of stenosis collected on the subject's 6 month angiography form. This will be characterized for each graft using the FitzGibbon scoring system based on the 64-Slice CT Angiography results.

The FitzGibbon Scoring system is as follows:

A:Excellent graft with unimpaired runoff (< 50% stenosis) B:Stenosis reducing caliber of proximal or distal anastomoses or trunk to <50% of the grafted coronary artery.

O:Occluded (100% stenosed)

6 months post-procedure
Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Early)
Time Frame: During procedure (day 1) and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer (throughout 6 month evaluation)

During procedure and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer. The adverse events will include:

  • Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention
  • Aortic complications
  • Graft vessel revision (GVR)
  • Transient ischemic attacks (TIA)
  • Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke
  • Myocardial infarction (MI)
  • Death
During procedure (day 1) and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer (throughout 6 month evaluation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Late)
Time Frame: After 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation

Characterize the composite major adverse event rate after 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation. The major adverse events will include:

  • Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention
  • Aortic complications
  • Graft vessel revision (GVR)
  • Transient ischemic attacks (TIA)
  • Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke
  • Myocardial infarction (MI)
  • Death
After 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph McGinn, MD, Staten Island University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 13, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 26, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arteriosclerosis of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Clinical Trials on Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Subscribe